1 / 8

Incorporating Pricing Strategies into the NEPA Project Development Process

Incorporating Pricing Strategies into the NEPA Project Development Process. Patrick DeCorla-Souza Federal Highway Administration TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference May, 2007. Reducing Demand with “ Substitutes ”. Alternative modes

nwhite
Télécharger la présentation

Incorporating Pricing Strategies into the NEPA Project Development Process

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Incorporating Pricing Strategies into the NEPA Project Development Process Patrick DeCorla-Souza Federal Highway Administration TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference May, 2007

  2. Reducing Demand with “Substitutes” • Alternative modes • Transit - fare reductions, service improvements • Ridesharing – HOV time and cost advantages • Convenience – pre-trip and on-trip traveler information • Alternative destinations • Telecommuting • Alternative times • Flextime, staggered work hours

  3. Reducing Demand with Congestion Pricing • Combine “push” with “pull” strategies • Toll SOV in peak periods • Free service for HOV, park-and-ride, etc. • Reduced transit fare, frequent service, etc. • Examples: • Bridge pricing - Bay area and NYC: HOV toll discounts • Cordon pricing –Stockholm and London • Expressway pricing - Singapore • Parking pricing – Southern California

  4. Need Both “Pull” and “Push” for Success in Reducing Demand • “Pull” strategies are necessary but not sufficient: • Reduction in delays due to such shifts will cause “replacement” of reduced traffic by those who had previously been deterred by congestion • To ensure that congestion does not return – total user-borne cost for driving must stay the same • Delay “cost” must be replaced by money cost – a congestion toll

  5. Congestion Pricing Potential • Traffic reduction: • 15% in London • 20% in Stockholm • 71% of eligible motorists shifted time of travel at least once a week to get toll discounts in Ft. Myers, Florida • In Singapore, expressway traffic flows freely in the peak periods 95% of the time

  6. 5:00 a.m. 6:00 a.m. 9:00 a.m. 7:00 a.m. 8:00 a.m. I-66, Northern VA - March 5, 2007

  7. Preventing Flow Breakdown with Congestion Pricing • Toll “price” to manage demand for use of freeway: • Does not waste a resource (time) as in ramp metering • Toll cost is not a “wasted” resource – revenue can be used to reduce taxes, pay for alternative modes, or generate additional benefits • Main issues: • Motorist may decide to divert to alternative routes • But if lost throughput is regained, this will not increase congestion -- total vehicle throughput and speed will actually increase (e.g., I-66 example)

  8. Contact Info • Patrick DeCorla-Souza, Program Manager, Urban Partnerships, FHWA • Tel: 202-366-4076 • E-mail: Patrick.deCorla-Souza@dot.gov • Web page: www.fightgridlocknow.gov

More Related