1 / 57

DESIGN-BUILD

DESIGN-BUILD. Design-Build. Authorization Project Selection Criteria Recent Changes. DESIGN-BUILD AUTHORIZATION. Authorization. Design Build (D-B) Contracting Authorization – FLORIDA STATUTES D-B Major Projects Authorization – 337.11(7) F.S. Buildings Major Bridge

nydia
Télécharger la présentation

DESIGN-BUILD

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. DESIGN-BUILD

  2. Design-Build • Authorization • Project Selection • Criteria • Recent Changes

  3. DESIGN-BUILD AUTHORIZATION

  4. Authorization • Design Build (D-B) Contracting Authorization – • FLORIDA STATUTES • D-B Major Projects Authorization – 337.11(7) F.S. • Buildings • Major Bridge • Limited Access Facilities • Rail Corridor • Estimated cost exceeds $10M

  5. Authorization • Design Build (D-B) Contracting Authorization • FLORIDA STATUTES • Minor D-B Projects Authorization –337.025 F.S. • Innovative Contracting Statute – Annual Cap of $120M • Minor Bridge • Resurfacing (no widening/shoulder work) • Projects not covered by 337.11(7) F.S. • Estimated Cost less than $10M

  6. DESIGN-BUILD PROJECT SELECTION

  7. Project Selection • Design Build (D-B) contracting should be considered on the following types of projects: • Demand an expedited schedule and can be completed earlier • Require minimal Right of Way acquisition and utility relocation • Well defined scope • Allow for innovation in the design and/or construction effort • Low risk of unforeseen conditions • Low possibility of significant changes

  8. Project Selection • Examples of projects which may be good D-B contracting candidates: • Major Bridges • Minor Bridges • ITS (computer signalized traffic) • Intersection improvement (with known utilities) • Buildings-office building, rest areas, welcome stations, etc.

  9. Project Selection • Examples of projects which may be good D-B contracting candidates (continued): • Interstate widening • Rural Widening • Fencing • Landscaping • Lighting • Signing • Signalization • Guardrail

  10. Project Selection • Examples of projects which may not be good • D-B contracting candidates are: • Major bridge rehab/repair with significant unknowns • Rehab of movable bridges • Urban construction/reconstruction with major utilities, major subsoil, R/W or other major unknowns

  11. DESIGN-BUILD CRITERIA

  12. Developing Design-Build Criteria • Adjusted Score or Low Bid? • Adjusted Score • Want (or need) to have input by evaluating the D-B firm and Technical Proposal (prior to bid time) • Innovation or potential alternatives exist • Scope is more versatile

  13. Developing Design-Build Criteria • Low Bid • Straight forward projects • (guardrail, noise walls, milling and resurfacing, etc.) • Scope is well defined

  14. Developing Design-Build Criteria • All aspects of the project for which there is a Department preference must be set. • Do we want it? • Do we not want it? • Includes multiple disciplines: Structures, Drainage, Traffic Operations, Permitting, Utilities, Roadway, Striping, Pavement Design, Estimates, FHWA, etc.

  15. Developing Design-Build Criteria • Information typically gathered before the • advertisement: (Department Concept) • Typical Section • Survey • Geotechnical • Utilities • Pavement Design

  16. Writing the Criteria • Department and Consultant Authors • Expectations should be clear • Be specific where appropriate • Don’t ask for things we don’t want/need

  17. Pre-qualification Requirements • Unless specifically stated otherwise in the Advertisement, standard pre-qualification requirements apply for the designer and contractor

  18. Request for Proposals • Much of the language is standard from SCO website • Grading Criteria • Decide what is important • Innovation • Maintenance of Traffic • Aesthetics • Environmental • Schedule • Assign Points Accordingly

  19. Advertisement • List only the pre-qualifications necessary for the major items of work. • List consultant work groups that are required. • List the criteria that will be used for evaluating the letters of interest. • FDOT Ads can be found at the following link: http://www2.dot.state.fl.us/procurement/ads/advdbld.htm

  20. Letters of Interest • Design/Build Experience • Joint Project Experience • Similar Project Experience • Past Performance (both team members) • Key Personnel and their experience • Any applicable commitments (DBE, Time, Warranties, etc.)

  21. Issue Escalation & Resolution • RFP sets a hierarchy for design issues and construction issues to be resolved through a defined chain of command • D-B Firm will be required to set a similar escalation process for both design and construction

  22. Issue Escalation & Resolution Design Project Manager Construction Project Mgr District Design Engineer District Const. Engineer Director of Development Director of Operations District Secretary District Secretary

  23. STIPENDS Only on ASDB Projects

  24. Stipends • The Department intends to compensate the unsuccessful short-listed Firms for submitting a proposal • The unsuccessful short-listed Firms may receive compensation (lump sum) for their efforts in preparing a proposal if the proposal is determined to be responsive • The intent to compensate and the amount of compensation will be noted in the RFP • This decision will be at the discretion of the contracting District or Central Office.

  25. Stipends • Federal funds MAY be used. • A Stipend is not intended to compensate the Firms for the total cost of preparing the proposal package. • In return, the Department reserves the right to use any of the concepts or ideas within the technical proposals, as the Department deems appropriate.

  26. Examples: A $4M rehabilitation project would have a recommended stipend of $4,000,000 (0.0050) = $ 20,000. A $30M complex urban project would have a recommended stipend of $30,000,000 (0.0020) = $ 60,000. A $175M new bridge project would have a recommended stipend of $175,000,000 (0.0010) = $175,000. Stipends GUIDELINES FOR ESTIMATING STIPEND AMOUNTS FOR DESIGN BUILD PROJECTS

  27. Alternative Technical Concepts • ATC Process allows: • Innovation • Flexibility • Time/Cost Savings • Best Value for public

  28. Alternative Technical Concepts • Used at District discretion on adjusted score D-B projects when probability of innovation or alternatives exist • ATC Meetings must comply with Sunshine Law

  29. Alternative Technical Concepts • ATC Meetings: • 2 (Max) per D-B Firm • Meeting schedule accounted for as part of Project Schedule identified in the RFP • Occur prior to RFP established due date for ATC formalized submittal

  30. Alternative Technical Concepts ATC Submittal must include: • Description (concept drawings, product details, traffic operational analysis, as appropriate) • Usage (where/how will it be used on project) • Deviations from RFP • Explanation of Deviation • Request for Approval

  31. Alternative Technical Concepts ATC Submittal must include: • Analysis justifying deviations from RFP if applicable • Impacts (during and after construction) • Vehicular • Environmental • Community • Safety • Lifecycle • Maintenance/operation

  32. Alternative Technical Concepts ATC Submittal must include: • Risks (added for Dept. or 3rd Party) • Quality – how is the ATC equal or better in quality or performance • Anticipated Life enhanced or compromised by ATC

  33. Alternative Technical Concepts • Department reviews the ATC and advises: • Concept is acceptable • Concept is unacceptable • Concept requires additional information Department responds within 2 weeks of ATC meeting or submittal of formal ATC. Correspondence maintained in project file

  34. Alternative Technical Concepts • If an approved ATC deviates from RFP, the department will: • Update RFP Criteria • Issue Addendum • Approved Design Exceptions/Design Variances require an update to the RFP • FHWA must approve such changes

  35. Alternative Technical Concepts • Department reserves right to disclose to all D-B firms any issues identified in ATC meetings or ATC submittals except those determined to reveal confidential or proprietary information

  36. Alternative Technical Concepts • Incorporation of ATC into Proposal: • D-B firm can opt to include approved ATC’s as part of proposal • Bid should reflect any approved/incorporated ATC’s • If not selected, D-B agrees to disclose work products associated w/ATC after receipt of Stipend or Contract Award, whichever occurs first

  37. Professional Liability Insurance • Per D-B Specifications • D-B Contract AmountMinimum Coverage • Up to $30M $1,000,000 • $30M - $75M $2,000,000 • > $ 75M $5,000,000

  38. Conflict of Interest Policy • Any Consultant or its affiliate developing the Request for Proposals for a project will not be eligible to compete for that project.

  39. Conflict of Interest Policy • DESIGN BUILD • The contractor or design professional cannot team, as a Prime, with other firms to submit more than one bid per project. • The secondary member (i.e. designer or contractor) of the design-build team cannot change, after award, without the written approval of the District Secretary.

  40. Conflict of Interest Policy • DESIGN BUILD (continued) • A consultant firm, its affiliate, or sub-consultant, that is under contract with the Department to provide Construction Engineering and Inspection (CEI) services on the Design-Build contract cannot be part of a Design-Build Team proposing on that contract as a prime or sub-consultant.

  41. DESIGN-BUILDRECENT CHANGES

  42. ADVERTISEMENT DESIGN BUILD GUIDELINES

  43. ADVERTISEMENT DESIGN BUILD PROCEDURE

  44. ADVERTISEMENT BOILERPATE ADVERTISEMENT http://www.dot.state.fl.us/construction/DesignBuild/DBDocuments/D-B_Boilerplate_AD_Locked.docx One-Stop Shopping for all things Design-Build http://www.dot.state.fl.us/construction/DesignBuild/AllSites/DesignBuildSites.shtm

  45. LETTERS OF INTEREST DESIGN-BUILD GUIDELINES

  46. LONG-LIST EVALUATION GUIDELINES DESIGN-BUILD GUIDELINES Sections 3.10.1.1 -3.10.1.11 http://www.dot.state.fl.us/construction/DesignBuild/DBRules/DesignBuildGuidelines.pdf Based on Industry feedback, these sections have been expanded to include more objective criteria.

  47. LONG-LIST EVALUATION GUIDELINES Design Build Guidelines LOI Evaluation Criteria Experience/Performance Considered for: • Most recent 5 year period • Out-of State projects • In-State other Local Government projects • FDOT use Department Database information if available (CIM, CPPR, etc.)

  48. LONG-LIST EVALUATION GUIDELINES Examples: Past Performance Grades Contractor • CPPR Designer • Professional Services Grades • Average D/W grade – Advertised Work Type • Average S/W grade – Advertised Work Type • Average D/W grade – All work Types • Average S/W grade – All work Types

  49. LONG-LIST EVALUATION GUIDELINES Examples (cont.): Design-Build Experience • Emphasis placed on: • D-B experience on S/W basis (FDOT) • In-State D-B experience (other local governments) • Out of State D-B experience

  50. LONG-LIST EVALUATION GUIDELINES Examples (cont.): Safety Record • Emphasis placed on: • OSHA Violations • Experience Modification Rating (EMR) • Industry Standard Satisfactory EMR = 1.0

More Related