40 likes | 150 Vues
This document presents a detailed comparison of the Conrod Violin models (2.2L and 2.0L) based on bore measurements and inspection results received from MD. The 2.2L model, sent on June 1st, 2007, shows varying bore measurements with particular findings including BORE values of 3.5mm, 4.0mm, and 4.4mm. The 2.0L model has been assessed but not yet sent for further analysis. Comparisons highlight notable differences in performance metrics and design across both models. This analysis is crucial for informed decision-making in engineering applications.
E N D
BSM model : received from MD at May,15th,2007 • Conrod violin model (2.2L) : sent to MD at June,1st,2007 • Check results #1 BORE : 3.5mm #2 BORE : 4.0mm #4 BORE : 3.8mm(vs. hsg2), 7.3mm(vs. upr hsg) #3 BORE : 4.4mm
BSM model : received from MD at May,15th,2007 • Conrod violin model (2.0L) : has not sent yet to MD • Check results #1 BORE : 5.0mm #2 BORE : 4.7mm #4 BORE : 6.0mm(vs. hsg2), 7.0mm(vs. upr hsg) #3 BORE : 5.1mm
[Reference 1] Comparison between old and new conrod violin Old : from FEV New : from HMC old Approx. 4.3mm new
2.2L : 2.0L : [Reference 2] Comparison between 2.2L and 2.0L new conrod violin 2.2L 0.3mm 2.0L Conrod violin of 2.2L includes that of 2.0L except above area by 0.3mm