1 / 27

Using Anomalies to Forecast High Impact Events

Using Anomalies to Forecast High Impact Events. David L. Beachler NOAA/National Weather Service Forecast Office Chicago IL 14-16 Mar 2012 Great Lakes Operational Meteorology Workshop Chicago IL. An anomalous outline…. Salient Points: Anomalies EPS Cases:

odette
Télécharger la présentation

Using Anomalies to Forecast High Impact Events

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Using Anomalies to Forecast High Impact Events • David L. Beachler • NOAA/National Weather Service Forecast Office Chicago IL • 14-16 Mar 2012 Great Lakes Operational Meteorology Workshop Chicago IL

  2. An anomalous outline… • Salient Points: • Anomalies • EPS • Cases: • Eastern United States Winter Storm: 1-2Feb2011 • Western Great Lakes Flood (Ridge Roller): 21-23July2010

  3. Why such an outlier? • Outliers in a data set can pose significant problems • Visually examine data…aids in identifying outliers • Envelope of possibilities • Clustering • NWP outliers at times are difficult • Operational Solutions at times offer chaos • EPS at times offers focus & generally less chaos • Once identified then what? • Forecasters leverage the significance • Tempted to eliminate…to simplify the forecast • Outliers have their place • Forecasters hone their skills along the fringes • Live on the edge through NWP forecasts • Aid in fine-tuning EPS • Eliminate the noise

  4. EPS: Big Picture • EPS provides the forest amongst the trees! • PATTERN RECOGNITION • Quick assessment of basic parameters • U-wind :FGEN/Trowal/Potential temp gradient • East-West • Positive between 180-360 ̊ • Negative between 360-180 ̊ • V-wind :Moisture transport • North-South • Positive between 90-270 ̊ • Negative between 270-90 ̊ • PWAT • MFLUX

  5. Strengthening Easterly Jet Anomalous U-wind

  6. Strengthening Easterly Jet Anomalous U-wind

  7. GEFS: 24-hr QPF

  8. SREF: Snowfall Threats

  9. Impacts… • Heavy Snow from OK to MI • Chicago 21.2” (72hr total) • South of Low Ice • Southern Plains/New England • ~0.5” Ice Indiana • Anomalous LLVL Easterly Jet • Inertial Gravity Wave (IGW)? • Likely resulted in Thunder/Blizzard conds from MO/IL • 15Dec1987 Observed IGW similar to 31Jan-2Feb2011

  10. Western Great Lakes Flood: 21-23July2010 • Dominant Subtropical Ridge • Galarneau & Bosart 2006 coined “ridge rollers” • Flooding aligned with Anomalous PWAT/Ridge • 23-24July2010: Heavy Rainfall (flooding) IA > 15” • Failure of Lake Delhi Dam (Eastern IA)

  11. Composite: 17-26July2010

  12. Plume Forecast • Offer point based analysis • Probabilistic approach to DSS • Visualize clustering and outliers with mean

  13. Service Assessment: Record Floods Middle Tennessee & Western Kentucky 1-4 May 2010 • At the time of this report, a paper under peer review entitled “The Devastating Mid-Mississippi Valley Floods of 1-2 May 2010”, by Richard H. Grumm, National Weather Service, noted the following:“The event of 1-2 May 2010 had …key ingredients for a significant heavy rainfall event (Doswell 1996), and for historic events (Bodner 2011); This case is a classic case on the value ofanomalies in identifying a potentially significant heavy rainfall event... [which] clearly defined a threat of a Maddox Synoptic event type with a strong southerly jet and a surge of high PW [precipitable water] air into the region.” • As the NWS focuses increasingly on Decision Support Services, offices and operational staff at all levels should place more attention on anomalies and pattern recognition in advance of potentially significant events.

  14. Closing… • All events demonstrate some anomaly • Noise amongst EPS suggests lower confidence • Forecasters live on the edge and can improve through operational envelope of solutions • Minimal spread provides better vision into the future • Ability to provide high-confidence forecast for DSS

  15. References • Web resources: http://cms.met.psu.edu/sref/ • SREF/GEFS options and Ensemble Threats Page • Forsythe, J.M., S.Q. Kidder, S.J. Kusselson, A.S. Jones, T.H. Vonder Haar, 2009: Increasing the land coverage of blended multisensory total precipitable water products for weather analysis. 16th Conference on Satellite Meteorology and Oceanography, Phoenix, Arizona. http://ams.confex.com/ams/89annual/techprogram/paper 149348.htm • Grumm, R.H. and R. Hart. 2001: Standardized Anomalies Applied to Significant Cold Season Weather Events: Preliminary Findings. Wea. and Fore., 16,736–754. • Hart, R. E., and R. H. Grumm, 2001: Using normalized climatological anomalies to rank synoptic scale events objectively. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 2426–2442. • Junker, N. W., R. H. Grumm, R. Hart, L. F. Bosart, K. M. Bell, and F. J. Pereira, 2008: Use of standardized anomaly fields to anticipate extreme rainfall in the mountains of northern California. Wea. Forecasting,23, 336–356. • Kusselson, S.J., S.Q. Kidder, J.M. Forsythe, A.J Jones, L. Zhao, 2009: An update on the operational implementation of blended total precipitable water products. 23rd Conference on Hydrology, Phoenix, AZ. http://ams.confex.com/ams/89annual/techprogram/paper_142967.htm • http://www.nws.noaa.gov/os/assessments/pdfs/Tenn_Flooding.pdf NWS Service Assessment Tennessee Flood • THEUSE OF ENSEMBLE AND ANOMALY DATA TO ANTICIPATE EXTREME FLOOD EVENTS IN THE NORTHEASTERN U.S. • Neil A. Stuart(1), Richard H. Grumm(2), John Cannon(3), and Walt Drag(4)

More Related