1 / 16

Streaming Video Traffic: Characterization and Network Impact

Streaming Video Traffic: Characterization and Network Impact. Kobus van der Merwe Shubho Sen Chuck Kalmanek {kobus,sen,crk}@research.att.com. Streaming Media Study: Why ?. Lot of streaming on the Internet Quality is getting pretty good Streaming is not well understood User behavior

oke
Télécharger la présentation

Streaming Video Traffic: Characterization and Network Impact

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Streaming Video Traffic: Characterization and Network Impact Kobus van der Merwe Shubho Sen Chuck Kalmanek {kobus,sen,crk}@research.att.com

  2. Streaming Media Study: Why ? • Lot of streaming on the Internet • Quality is getting pretty good • Streaming is not well understood • User behavior • Factors that impact quality • Network impact + distribution • Reasons: • Proprietary protocols • WM, Real • Very commercial • logs files are sensitive and hard to get

  3. On Demand Dates: 12/2001-03/2002 # Requests: 3.5 million # Unique IPs : 0.5 million # Unique ASs : 6600 WM and Real BW:~56 Kbps and ~300 Kbps Live Dates: 02/2002 – 03/2002 # Requests: 1 million # Unique IPs: 0.28 million # Unique ASs: 4000 WM only BW: ~100 Kbps encoded The Data On Demand: prerecorded clips from current affairs & information site Live: commerce oriented continuous live stream Traffic volume : several terabytes Routing data: daily BGP table dumps from Tier-1 ISP

  4. On Demand: Traffic Composition By Bandwidth (56 Kbps/300 Kbps) : High BW dominates: 65% requests, 95% bytes Low BW: 35% of sessions account for just 5% of data By transport: HTTP : 37% requests, 27% bytes TCP : 29% requests, 45% bytes UDP : 34 % requests, 28% bytes Proprietary Streaming dominates: 63 % requests, 73 % bytes Total TCP dominates: 66 % requests, 72 % bytes - probably because of firewalls By protocol (WM/Real): Windows Media dominates: 77% requests, 76% bytes

  5. On Demand: per-AS breakdown by protocol ASs contributing 80% requests or 80% traffic Traffic volume # Requests Most ASs generate more MMS than RealMedia Traffic

  6. On Demand: per-AS breakdown by stream bandwidth # Requests Traffic volume Most ASs generate more High Bandwidth traffic

  7. Live: Traffic Composition By transport: HTTP : 55% requests, 47% bytes TCP : 17% requests, 38% bytes UDP : 28 % requests, 17% bytes Proprietary Streaming (TCP + UDP) : 45 % requests, 55 % bytes Total TCP dominates: 72 % requests, 85 % bytes - probably because of firewalls Proprietary Streaming, HTTP have similar shares

  8. On Demand: Network Traffic Distribution # Requests Volume Significant variability in traffic contributions: 10% ASes account for 82% requests, 85% data

  9. Content Distribution Impact • Goal: Evaluate different content distribution approaches • Centralized + IP peering • Centralized + content peering • Centralized + replica placement • Assume traffic distributed from (originating from) Tier-1 ISP • Look at coverage achieved by different approaches • Traffic distribution using AS hop-count from Tier-1 ISP as a metric • Assumption: for streams originating in Tier-1 ISP small AS-hop count will increase probability of acceptable quality

  10. Content Distribution Impact • Selected ASes: “consistent contributors” out of 6600 • Caveats: • Hop count not good metric of anything • Limited data set • Data set might be self selecting

  11. On Demand :Traffic Time Series Significant variability within/across days Peak = 31 * Mean

  12. On Demand :Rapid Increase in Load Load increases 57 times in 10 minutes !

  13. Live: Traffic Time Series Significant variability within/across days Peak = 9* Mean

  14. Object Popularities Volume 320 clips # Sessions 320 clips Few heavy-hitters account for bulk of traffic Dec 13: top 5 clips account for 85% of traffic

  15. On Demand: Session Characteristics High Bw mms Low Bw mms Most sessions download a fraction of the object. A larger proportion of high bw clip is downloaded

  16. Summary • Windows Media dominates • High encoding rates dominate • TCP transport dominate • Highly skewed request + volume distributions • Tier-1 ISPs cover %% < 2 AS hops • Significant coverage with small # selective arrangements • High variability in daily traffic patterns • Ramp up in tens of minutes • Highly skewed object popularity • High bit-rate clips watched longer

More Related