1 / 13

Kansas Department of Health and Environment Facility Profiler System

Kansas Department of Health and Environment Facility Profiler System. Introduction to the System. Exchange Network Grant History. One Stop Grant $500,000 (’02) Readiness Grant $297,000 (’03) Implementation Grant $300,000 (’04) Challenge Grant ( HERE ) $750,000 (’05)

olaf
Télécharger la présentation

Kansas Department of Health and Environment Facility Profiler System

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Kansas Department of Health and Environment Facility Profiler System Introduction to the System

  2. Exchange Network Grant History One Stop Grant $500,000 (’02) Readiness Grant $297,000 (’03) Implementation Grant $300,000 (’04) Challenge Grant (HERE) $750,000 (’05) Infrastructure Grant (CME) $223,000 (’06) Implementation II $245,000

  3. Exchange Network Flow Goals State to EPA & EPA to State FRS, NEI, SDWIS, AQS, RCRA, FEA, RMP RCRAInfo, WQX, UIC, ICIS-NPDES (Proposed) State to State KS to {MO,NE,IA} (HERE Project Presentation Tomorrow) Intrastate KDA to KDHE (Ag Chemicals) Regulated Community TRI

  4. 45 32’ N Affiliated Parties Facility name, Industry Classification 122 40’W Geographic Location Environmental Interests Facility Profiler Data Content

  5. Facility Profiler Goals • Establish an agency-wide data sharing environment • Support FOIA requests (e.g., ‘Who’s doing what nearby?’) thus reducing agency burden • Support drivers for integrated environmental data from EPA, the legislature, and the regulated community • Assist with internal bureau coordination (e.g., during permit reviews or enforcement actions) • Participate in the National Exchange Network

  6. Facility Profiler Overview

  7. Additional Benefits • Browser based GIS mapping capabilities on agency desktops • Facility location address cleaning • Derivation of facility location coordinates • Identification of facility duplication in existing systems • Facility name data standardization • Allows users to query and download data • Can provide a ‘portal’ to bureaus’ inquiry systems

  8. Multiple Source Systems

  9. Multiple External Connections Internet Applications KDHEIntranet

  10. Monarch Cement

  11. Wichita Area of Interest

  12. Sharing • Facility Profiler Reuse • Michigan (.Net, SQL Server) • Kansas (.Net, Oracle) • North Dakota (.Net, SQL Server) • Nevada (.Net, Oracle) • Connecticut - variant (.Net, SQL Server) • Missouri (Java, DB2)

  13. Conclusions • Integration doesn’t have to be all or nothing • Integrated data access doesn’t require integrated data management – a warehouse can be a highly effective, lower cost alternative • Integration is not just an agency thing anymore • Data about your state is probably disparate; • The EN allows for comprehensive data integration • States can collaborate effectively • Share data – e.g., HERE • Share investments – e.g., Node, Plugins, Applications (FP)

More Related