1 / 47

Population Health in Norway, Sweden and Denmark

Population Health in Norway, Sweden and Denmark. Impressions, thoughts?. Population Health in Norway, Sweden and Denmark. Agenda. READINGS: course is about populations and we tend to think about individuals KEEP YOUR READINGS IN CASE I or TA MISS ONE Critical thinking skills

oleg
Télécharger la présentation

Population Health in Norway, Sweden and Denmark

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Population Health in Norway, Sweden and Denmark

  2. Impressions, thoughts? Population Health in Norway, Sweden and Denmark

  3. Agenda • READINGS: course is about populations and we tend to think about individuals • KEEP YOUR READINGS IN CASE I or TA MISS ONE • Critical thinking skills • Trends in health with comparisons to US • Social and Historical factors in Scandinavia • Importance of early childhood: • Something rotten in the state of Denmark?

  4. United Nations Human Development Report 2007

  5. Female Oeppen Science 2002

  6. Yanagishita & Guralnik 1998

  7. Population Health Nordic CountriesYear Norway Sweden

  8. Sweden United States

  9. Sweden United States

  10. Sweden United States

  11. Sweden United States

  12. Sweden United States

  13. Household Poverty Rates (Household Head Aged 25-64)

  14. Social transfer: family allowances, disability, sickness benefits, formal daycare, unemployment insurance Not including spending on health care or education

  15. SINGLE PARENT

  16. Infant mortality differentials in Stockholm, by birth in and out of wedlock, 1901–1981 (Burstrom 2003).

  17. Low-wage earners, social expenditures and percent lone-parent households

  18. Child Morbidity/Mortality Risksfor being from a single-parent family (Weitoff 2003)

  19. USA Sweden

  20. Norway history and society • Norway’s welfare state established following the brutal German occupation during World War II. a strong sense of camaraderie and national identity was forged. • Labor Party led the country until 1965, decided that government should take responsibility for the public welfare, striving for the highest possible level of equality and a just distribution of wealth. • Norway’s then elected a King Haakon set an example by serving fish balls, a common peasant food, to foreign dignitaries at his castle. Today, King Olav takes the street car • Laws:everyone has right to reasonable house, food, education, health care, child care, a livable pension • Hotel maids wages average $28,500 and CEO's of oil companies average $43,000 to $57,000 Everyone's incomes are public knowledge • Third largest oil exporter behind Saudi Arabia and Russia, but is state owed Statoil • Crime: lowest murder rates in world, despite 720,000 registered firearms, prisons with private rooms, TV and internet access • Trust highest among nations, bicycles not locked • National ethic: thrift, self-effacement, leveling tax code. "if anything ruffles Norwegian sensibilities more than special treatment under the law, it may be the open enjoyment of luxury" (NYT 931225) Consumer goods very expensive

  21. Norway United States

  22. % TRUST Olympics percentage of respondents, by country, to surveys who responded affirmatively to the the question ‘Generally speaking, would you say that most people can be trusted, or that you cannot be too careful in dealing with people?’ The surveys were done in person in 1996 using the native language, and the questions correspond to impressions of the respondents’ own countries. Strikingly, the data vary by an order of magnitude: while only 3% of those surveyed in Brazil and 5% in Peru say their compatriots are trustworthy, 65% of Norwegians and 60% of Swedes believe this to be so. The United States comes in at 36%, down from 50% in 1990; . Zak

  23. High/Low Tax Country Comparisons United States Australia Ireland New Zealand Canada United Kingdom Norway Finland Denmark Sweden

  24. United States Australia Ireland New Zealand Canada United Kingdom Norway Finland Denmark Sweden High/Low Tax Country Comparisons

  25. United States Australia Ireland New Zealand Canada United Kingdom Norway Finland Denmark Sweden High/Low Tax Country Comparisons

  26. United States Australia Ireland New Zealand Canada United Kingdom Norway Finland Denmark Sweden High/Low Tax Country Comparisons

  27. United States Australia Ireland New Zealand Canada United Kingdom Norway Finland Denmark Sweden High/Low Tax Country Comparisons

  28. High/Low Tax Country Comparisons United States Australia Ireland New Zealand Canada United Kingdom Norway Finland Denmark Sweden

  29. United States Australia Ireland New Zealand Canada United Kingdom Norway Finland Denmark Sweden High/Low Tax Country Comparisons

  30. Arithmetic Scores for Youth Aged 16-25, 1994 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Sweden Germany Switzerland Effect Size Netherlands Belgium Canada USA Poland New Zealand Ireland N Ireland G Britain Parents’ Level of Education Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and Statistics Canada. (1995).

  31. International comparisons of intergenerational social mobility Higher columns show that people’s social position is more strongly determined by their parents’ position Source: Blanden J, Gregg P, Machin S. Intergenerational mobility in Europe and N. America. Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics. 2005

  32. Breast Feeding Olympics

  33. United Nations Human Development Report 2007

  34. Something rotten in the state of Denmark

  35. Helweg-Larsen et. al. Women in Denmark-why do they die so young? Risk factors for prematur death Scand, J. Soc Welfare 1998

  36. Helweg-Larsen et. al. Women in Denmark-why do they die so young? Risk factors for prematur death Scand, J. Soc Welfare 1998

  37. Helweg-Larsen et. al. Women in Denmark-why do they die so young? Risk factors for prematur death Scand, J. Soc Welfare 1998

  38. Helweg-Larsen et. al. Women in Denmark-why do they die so young? Risk factors for prematur death Scand, J. Soc Welfare 1998

  39. Helweg-Larsen et. al. Women in Denmark-why do they die so young? Risk factors for prematur death Scand, J. Soc Welfare 1998

  40. Mortality (female-lung cancer 1952-1993) Juel 2000

  41. Life expectancy trends for 20 year old's DENMARK Brønnum-Hansen 2005

  42. Juel 2000

More Related