1 / 57

Zafer Kanık Supervisor: Assist. Prof. Dr. Serkan Küçükşenel

MECHANISM DESIGN FOR THE OPTIMAL ALLOCATION OF QUOTAS AND THE DETERMINATION OF THE TOTAL ALLOWABLE CATCH FOR EU FISHERIES UNDER AN AGE - STRUCTURED MODEL. Zafer Kanık Supervisor: Assist. Prof. Dr. Serkan Küçükşenel. Outline.

olina
Télécharger la présentation

Zafer Kanık Supervisor: Assist. Prof. Dr. Serkan Küçükşenel

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. MECHANISM DESIGN FOR THE OPTIMAL ALLOCATION OF QUOTAS AND THE DETERMINATION OF THE TOTAL ALLOWABLE CATCH FOR EU FISHERIES UNDER AN AGE-STRUCTURED MODEL Zafer Kanık Supervisor: Assist. Prof. Dr. Serkan Küçükşenel September, 2012| Z. Kanık| 1

  2. Outline • Dynamics of management of fisheries and concerns about fisheries • The Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) and EU Fisheries • Rights - Based Management (RBM) Systems • Total Allowable Catch (TAC) • Relative Stability • Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY) • Aim and Scope of the Thesis • Define the population model • Describe the mechanism for allocation of quotas • Minimize the impact of fishing • Achieve MSY September, 2012| Z. Kanık| 2

  3. Overview • What are the concerns about fisheries? • Overfishing and overcapitalization • -Europe suffers from overfishing at a higher rate than world average.29 of 33 most important commercial fish stocks in Europe were overfished. Hence, management of fisheries gains more importance in the EU. • True determination of TAC and efficiently allocation of quotas under an output rights system. • - TACs are the maximum amount of catch allowed for that year. • Achieving MSY • MSY is the maximum amount of catch while protecting fish capacity by sustaining regeneration in the future. September, 2012| Z. Kanık| 3

  4. The CommonFisheriesPolicy(CFP) and EUFisheries • The CFP, one of the effective fisheries policies globally, has been used for providing sustainability and efficiency of EU fisheries and finding long-run solutions to the EU fishing industry. • In the next CFP reform, MSYand transferable fishing concessions come to the forefront. • The EU promotes measures for minimizing the impact of fishing on marine ecosystems. • Management systems play the key role. September, 2012| Z. Kanık| 4

  5. Rights-Based Management (RBM) Systems • Fisheries management system is a different combination of rules in fishing times, fishing areas, fishing equipment, fishing vessels, species, harvesting volumes, discards and the other factors to carry-out fisheries. • The most preferred options among these systems are RBMs. • RBM Systems • Input Rights Output Rights Limited Entry September, 2012| Z. Kanık| 5

  6. Total Allowable Catch • The determination of the TAC as the inital step. • A well functioning quota system and truly determined TAC enable us to provide sustainability conditions and achieve MSY under an output quota regime. • Setting TACs is used for fixing maximum quantities of fish that can be landed from a specific stock in a given time. • TACs are distributed as percentage of total quotas or as specific numbers of tones of harvesting. September, 2012| Z. Kanık| 6

  7. Relative Stability • In the EU, TACs are determined at the Union level and distributed to the EU countries based on the principle of ‘relative stability’. • The principle of the relative stabilityrefers to historical catches of countries in the EU. • Principle of ‘relative stability’ is one of the controversial issues of fisheries policy in the EU. September, 2012| Z. Kanık| 7

  8. Maximum Sustainable Yield • Different models are used for estimation of MSY • Age-structured fish population model • Biological conditions are taken into consideration • - More complex than simple biomass model • - More realistic way of estimation September, 2012| Z. Kanık| 8

  9. Aim and Scope of the Thesis • The main aim of the thesis is investigating the importance of quota allocation mechanisms and the determination of TAC levels. • Fishing technologies are embedded in the economic model as a key determinant. • We indicated technology-based optimality conditions for quota allocations at different TAC levels, which minimize the impact of fishing on total fish biomass. • Furthermore, in the analyses of MSY, we specified the optimum allocation of quotas at different TAC levels. September, 2012| Z. Kanık| 9

  10. The Population Model • Three cohorts of the fish population • Juveniles, (age < 1) • Young matures, (1 ≤ age < 2) • Old matures, (2 ≤ age) • Beverton-Holttype recruitment function. The numbers of recruits are, September, 2012| Z. Kanık| 10

  11. The Population Model September, 2012| Z. Kanık| 11

  12. The Population Model September, 2012| Z. Kanık| 12

  13. The Impact of Fishing on Total Biomass Change under an Age-Structured Model • In the first part, • The impact of fishing on total biomass is equal to the difference between the amount of change in total biomass from year t to t+1 under fishing conditions and non-fishing conditions. • Mechanism design for fishing quota allocations at different TACs, which minimizes the impact of fishing on total biomass change from year t to t+1. September, 2012| Z. Kanık| 13

  14. The Impact of Fishing on Total Biomass Change under an Age-Structured Model September, 2012| Z. Kanık| 14

  15. The Impact of Fishing on Total Biomass Change under an Age-Structured Model September, 2012| Z. Kanık| 15

  16. The Impact of Fishing on Total Biomass Change under an Age-Structured Model September, 2012| Z. Kanık| 16

  17. The Impact of Fishing on Total Biomass Change under an Age-Structured Model September, 2012| Z. Kanık| 17

  18. The Impact of Fishing on Total Biomass Change under an Age-Structured Model September, 2012| Z. Kanık| 18

  19. The Impact of Fishing on Total Biomass Change under an Age-Structured Model September, 2012| Z. Kanık| 19

  20. The Impact of Fishing on Total Biomass Change under an Age-Structured Model September, 2012| Z. Kanık| 20

  21. The Impact of Fishing on Total Biomass Change under an Age-Structured Model September, 2012| Z. Kanık| 21

  22. The Impact of Fishing on Total Biomass Change under an Age-Structured Model September, 2012| Z. Kanık| 22

  23. The Impact of Fishing on Total Biomass Change under an Age-Structured Model September, 2012| Z. Kanık| 23

  24. The Impact of Fishing on Total Biomass Change under an Age-Structured Model September, 2012| Z. Kanık| 24

  25. The Impact of Fishing on Total Biomass Change under an Age-Structured Model September, 2012| Z. Kanık| 25

  26. The Impact of Fishing on Total Biomass Change under an Age-Structured Model September, 2012| Z. Kanık| 26

  27. The Impact of Fishing on Total Biomass Change under an Age-Structured Model September, 2012| Z. Kanık| 27

  28. The Impact of Fishing on Total Biomass Change under an Age-Structured Model September, 2012| Z. Kanık| 28

  29. The Impact of Fishing on Total Biomass Change under an Age-Structured Model September, 2012| Z. Kanık| 29

  30. The Impact of Fishing on Total Biomass Change under an Age-Structured Model September, 2012| Z. Kanık| 30

  31. The Impact of Fishing on Total Biomass Change under an Age-Structured Model September, 2012| Z. Kanık| 31

  32. The Impact of Fishing on Total Biomass Change under an Age-Structured Model September, 2012| Z. Kanık| 32

  33. The Impact of Fishing on Total Biomass Change under an Age-Structured Model September, 2012| Z. Kanık| 33

  34. The Impact of Fishing on Total Biomass Change under an Age-Structured Model September, 2012| Z. Kanık| 34

  35. The Impact of Fishing on Total Biomass Change under an Age-Structured Model September, 2012| Z. Kanık| 35

  36. The Impact of Fishing on Total Biomass Change under an Age-Structured Model September, 2012| Z. Kanık| 36

  37. Maximum Sustainable Biomass Yield under an Age-Structured Model September, 2012| Z. Kanık| 37

  38. Maximum Sustainable Biomass Yield under an Age-Structured Model September, 2012| Z. Kanık| 38

  39. Maximum Sustainable Biomass Yield under an Age-Structured Model September, 2012| Z. Kanık| 39

  40. Maximum Sustainable Biomass Yield under an Age-Structured Model September, 2012| Z. Kanık| 40

  41. Maximum Sustainable Biomass Yield under an Age-Structured Model September, 2012| Z. Kanık| 41

  42. Maximum Sustainable Biomass Yield under an Age-Structured Model September, 2012| Z. Kanık| 42

  43. Maximum Sustainable Biomass Yield under an Age-Structured Model September, 2012| Z. Kanık| 43

  44. Maximum Sustainable Biomass Yield under an Age-Structured Model September, 2012| Z. Kanık| 44

  45. Maximum Sustainable Biomass Yield under an Age-Structured Model September, 2012| Z. Kanık| 45

  46. Maximum Sustainable Biomass Yield under an Age-Structured Model September, 2012| Z. Kanık| 46

  47. Maximum Sustainable Biomass Yield under an Age-Structured Model September, 2012| Z. Kanık| 47

  48. Maximum Sustainable Biomass Yield under an Age-Structured Model September, 2012| Z. Kanık| 48

  49. Maximum Sustainable Biomass Yield under an Age-Structured Model September, 2012| Z. Kanık| 49

  50. Maximum Sustainable Biomass Yield under an Age-Structured Model September, 2012| Z. Kanık| 50

More Related