1 / 13

The Review Process

The Review Process. What happens to your proposal Two Review Criteria. Returned Without Review/Withdrawn. NSF Proposal & Award Process & Timeline. NSF Announces Opportunity. Award. Via DGA. N S F. MERIT REVIEW. Institution submits via FastLane or Grants.gov. Prog. Off. Anal.

olivia-owen
Télécharger la présentation

The Review Process

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Review Process • What happens to your proposal • Two Review Criteria

  2. Returned Without Review/Withdrawn NSF Proposal & Award Process & Timeline NSF Announces Opportunity Award Via DGA N S F MERIT REVIEW Institution submits via FastLane or Grants.gov Prog. Off. Anal. & Recom. Mail Div PO Staff DD Concur Panel Both Organization Research & Education Communities Decline Proposal Receipt at NSF DD Concur Award 90 Days 6 Months 30 Days Proposal Receipt to Division Director Concurrence of Program Officer Recommendation Proposal Preparation Time DGA Review & Processing of Award

  3. Merit Review Criteria • Criterion 1:What is the intellectual merit of the proposed activity? • Creativity and originality of ideas • Qualifications of investigators • Access to resources • Established expertise or expert collaborations • Criterion 2: What are the broader impacts of the proposed activity? • Potential to advance field (transformative) • Participation of underrepresented groups • Benefits to society

  4. NSF Panel Review(most research divisions) • Advisory panel ~ 6-20 people • Proposals receive at least 3 reviews • Each reviewer describes his/her views of the proposal to the rest of the panel • The panel as a whole then discusses proposal • The proposal is placed in funding recommendation category (e.g. Fund, Fund if Possible, Do not fund)

  5. Preparing Competitive Proposal • Helpful tips • What to do if declined • How funding decisions are made

  6. Tip #1. Do your homework • Read the Program announcement/solicitation • Understand goals, eligibility, requirements • Research or teaching? • Become familiar with program • Serve as a reviewer (ad hoc or on a panel) • Examine prior NSF awards in similar areas • Read successful proposals • Talk with people: • Program Officers • Current or former “rotators”

  7. Tip #2. Write well • Start early (write and rewrite) • Get critiques from: • Mentors/colleagues • Previous members of review panels • Be aware of the scope: • “Too ambitious” vs. “Too narrow” • Be honest and up-front: • Address issues instead of trying to hide them • Acknowledge possible experimental problems and have alternatives

  8. Tip #2. Write well . . . • Convince reviewers that your proposal is THE one to support. • Comments you want to hear…. • “I wish I could be as productive and as creative as this PI” • “If you can fund only one proposal in this area, this is it!” • “Wow!”

  9. Tip #2. Write well . . .Comments you do not want to see…. • “Reading this proposal was a sheer torture.” • “This one puts me to sleep every night!” • “My freshman students know better.” • “This PI wants to mow an old lawn, without a problem, originality, or track record of winning races.” • ”No way!”

  10. Tip #3. Anticipate reviewer comments • Do not assume reviewer knows what you are thinking • Simplify and streamline • Make sure you get your overall idea across! • Pay attention to details: • Run “spell check” and proof-read • Prepare clear photos, graphs, etc. • Use allowed font size • Be aware of reviewer fatigue

  11. If you have to resubmit. . . • Stay calm! • Take ten… breaths, hours, days • Examine the criticisms carefully • Contact your program director • Email, call, or visit • Find out how to improve proposal • Include a ‘Response to Reviewer Comments’ section in the resubmission

  12. How Funding Decisions are Made Program Director makes recommendations to the Division Director based on: • Advice of the panel • Budgetary constraints • Other programmatic considerations – • geographic distribution • type of institution • PI demographics • potential high payoff

  13. Some insights • What determines funding chances? • Reviews • Panel discussion • NSF and Program Priorities • Contact your program director • Cultures, practices, and funding priorities vary across NSF • e-mail, call, or visit • Volunteer to review proposals

More Related