1 / 12

Modes of Observations (Research Designs)

Modes of Observations (Research Designs). Experiments Survey Research Field Research Unobtrusive Research Evaluation Research Each of these methods have different strengths and weaknesses And different areas where they are more or less useful.

olympe
Télécharger la présentation

Modes of Observations (Research Designs)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Modes of Observations(Research Designs) • Experiments • Survey Research • Field Research • Unobtrusive Research • Evaluation Research • Each of these methods have different strengths and weaknesses • And different areas where they are more or less useful

  2. Criteria for establishing causation in the social sciences • Establish a relationship • Establish time ordering • Rule out spuriousness • How do experiments do these things?

  3. Critical Components of Experiments • Independent and Dependent Variables • The “cause” is the experimental manipulation • Pre-test and Post-test • Experimental and Control Groups • RANDOM ASSIGNMENT • NOTE: This is different from random sampling • Generalization (random sampling) • Rule out spuriousness (random assignment)

  4. The “Classic” Experimental Design RANDOM ASSIGNMENT SUBJECT POOL TIME

  5. The Subjects • Selection of a subject pool • Effects the extent to which experimenter can generalize • Difficult to do “random sample” (must “recruit” subjects). • BUT  less of an issue for explanatory research • Still, “Mice versus Men” (Or Men vs. Women) • Assignment of subjects to groups • Randomized • Matching

  6. Close, but no cigar…Experimental designs that fall short • The One-Shot case study • The One-Group pretest-posttest design • The Static-Group comparison • NOTE • Sometimes, to capitalize on “natural,” phenomena, research will do these “quasi-experiments” and try to rule out threats to internal validity

  7. Other Important Considerations • Placebo • The “Hawthorne effect” • Double Blind Experiments • Neither subjects (this is typically the case) nor experimenters are aware of who is in the control or experimental group

  8. Threats to Internal Validity • History • Maturation • Testing • Instrumentation • Statistical regression • Selection bias • Experimental mortality • Demoralization

  9. External Validity • External validity = generalizability • “Laboratory experiments” versus “the wilds of society” • Example: the effect of “pre-testing” on subjects • Subjects (both control and experimental) become sensitized to the independent variable • Results may not “work” in real world because people are sensitized in the same way • Solution: “Solomon Four-Group Design” (or better yet, no pre-testing at all). • Experiments in general are “artificial” and are suspect with regard to generalizability

  10. Natural Experiments • Sometimes called “quasi-experiments” • They lack one or more of the hallmarks of the classic experimental design • Death penalty research • Low birth-weight study • Study of nuclear power plants • Prejudice and Roots • Evaluation research often uses quasi-experimental designs

  11. Experiments • Review and Summary • Classic experimental design (not used as posttest only) • Random assignment as key • Advantages of Experimental Design? • Disadvantages?

  12. How does an experimental design… • Establish a relationship • Establish time ordering • Rule out spuriousness

More Related