1 / 31

Rapid Replacement of Short Span Local Government Bridges Using the Rocla M-Lock Bridging System

Rapid Replacement of Short Span Local Government Bridges Using the Rocla M-Lock Bridging System. Ken Wheeler Senior Principal, Manager Bridges Cardno The Australian Small Bridges Conference 2005. Introduction. Overview of short span bridge replacements

omer
Télécharger la présentation

Rapid Replacement of Short Span Local Government Bridges Using the Rocla M-Lock Bridging System

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Rapid Replacement of Short Span Local Government Bridges Using the Rocla M-Lock Bridging System Ken Wheeler Senior Principal, Manager Bridges Cardno The Australian Small Bridges Conference 2005

  2. Introduction • Overviewof short span bridge replacements • AS5100 and state road authority design requirements • Development of M-Lock bridging system for local roads & highways • Applications of M-Lock bridging system to rural and urban bridgesites around Australia Page 2

  3. Overview • Australia has a large number of timber, steel and concrete bridges requiring on-going maintenance and rehabilitation. • Number of timber bridges: • New South Wales: 4850 • Queensland: 3500 • Western Australia: 3000 • Victoria: 625 • Tasmania: 100 • Approximately 88% of timber bridges are owned by local councils Page 3

  4. Overview • Most of these bridges were designed for a 20 tonne truck, are understrength and need to be replaced in the near future - maintenance and safety issue for owners. • Recent survey within NSW by Cardno • Maintenance cost of timber bridges: $19m • Maintenance cost of steel bridges: $7m • Maintenance cost of concrete bridges: $11m • Planned replacement of bridges: 58 per year • Planned refurbishment of bridges: 100 per year Page 4

  5. Overview • Survey identified following criteria for assessing bridge systems for use in bridge construction: - Life cycle cost - Maintenance required - Design life - Initial cost • Initial cost is a critical factor given the limited maintenance funds available Page 5

  6. Overview • Bridge community is conservative by nature because of high level of responsibility for public assets. • New bridge technologies carefully introduced – wide acceptance only given after proven satisfactory performance. • Issues considered for bridge replacements include: - strength and robustness - speed of installation – minimal traffic disruption - minimal on-site activities, especially placement of concrete in remote areas • skill levels required for construction personnel Page 6

  7. Overview • Modular bridge systems developed for short span bridge replacements include: - Humedeck - M-Lock - Doolan deck • Waldren • FRP composite • Span lengths generally up to 12m Page 7

  8. Design Requirements • AS5100 introduced in May 2004 • Nominates SM1600 as design live load – corresponds to a 72 tonne vehicle over a 10m span bridge – provision for potential future increases in legal load limits • New bridge barrier performance levels • Forces resulting from water flow, particularly buoyancy effects Page 8

  9. Design Requirements • RTA, NSW Bridge Policy requirements for modular bridges: • CBE 99/1 (February 1999): • defined as precast structural components connected together to form a bridge deck with no in-situ concrete topping slab • restrictions on joint placements related to AADT Page 9

  10. Design Requirements • CBE 99/5 (July 1999): • Clarified requirements for multi-beam bridges • Longitudinal joint restriction – limited to traffic volumes <1000 AADT or 300 AADT for heavy vehicles (30 year projections) • Transverse joint restriction - limited to traffic volumes <2000 AADT or 500 AADT for heavy vehicles (30 year projections) Page 10

  11. Development of M-Lock Bridging System • Based on Rocla product first introduced in USA in 1952 • Redesigned and detailed to comply with 1992 AUSTROADS Bridge Design Code requirements • Updated to comply with AS5100-2004 Bridge Design Code • Designed for T44/HLP320 and SM1600 live loadings Page 11

  12. Development of M-Lock Bridging System • Precast reinforced concrete components: • Piles – driven and socketted • Pier and abutment headstocks • Deck units • Traffic barriers • Span lengths: 7m, 8m, 9m, 10m,11m, 12m spans • Skews of 15 and 30 degrees • Longitudinal grouted shear keys between deck units Page 12

  13. Development of M-Lock Bridging System • Local Roads System: • AADT < 1000 vehicles • Transversely bolted deck units plus upturned ends of headstocks • Generally 2% two way crossfall • No in-situ topping or wearing surface • In use since 1995 – approx 110 bridges constructed within Australia Page 13

  14. Development of M-Lock Bridging System • Highways System • AADT > 1000 vehicles: unrestricted approval granted by RTA, NSW in 2001 and subsequently accepted by VicRoads, Qld Main Roads, WA Main Roads and SA Dept Transport • Deck units transversely stressed • Asphaltic concrete wearing surface • First bridge constructed in 2002 at Bella Vista, Sydney Page 14

  15. Development of M-Lock Bridging System • Recent developments: • Barrier types – castellated, Thrie, precast reinforced concrete, metal post & rail, combined pedestrian/traffic • Precast cantilevered footway panels • Façade panels • Incorporation of services penetrations • Incorporation of grates (DIPNR requirements) • 15m span length Page 15

  16. Applications of M-Lock Bridging System Bridge Over Ohio Creek, Walcha, NSW (1995) Page 16

  17. Applications of M-Lock Bridging System Bridge Over Bokhara River, Goodooga, NSW (1999) Page 17

  18. Applications of M-Lock Bridging System Bridge Over Culgoa River, Goodooga, NSW (1999) Page 18

  19. Applications of M-Lock Bridging System Bridge Over Drainage Channel, Blair Athol, NSW (2000) Page 19

  20. Applications of M-Lock Bridging System Bridge Over Davies Creek, Bathurst, NSW (2001) Page 20

  21. Applications of M-Lock Bridging System Bridge Over O’Connell River, Bloomsbury, Qld (2002) Page 21

  22. Applications of M-Lock Bridging System Chancellor Park, Sippy Downs, Qld (2002) Page 22

  23. Applications of M-Lock Bridging System Bridge Over Elizabeth Macarthur Creek, Bella Vista, NSW (2002) Page 23

  24. Applications of M-Lock Bridging System Bridge Over Cosgroves Creek, Luddenham, NSW (2004) Page 24

  25. Applications of M-Lock Bridging System Bridge Over Darling Anabranch, Wentworth, NSW (2003) Page 25

  26. Applications of M-Lock Bridging System Green Views Estate, West Hoxton, NSW (2005) Page 26

  27. Applications of M-Lock Bridging System Bridge Over Belubula River, Carcoar, NSW (2004) Page 27

  28. Applications of M-Lock Bridging System Bridge Over Gascoyne River, Bibbawarra, WA (2005) Page 28

  29. Applications of M-Lock Bridging System Bridge Over Shoalhaven River, Braidwood, NSW (2005) Page 29

  30. Applications of M-Lock Bridging System Bridge Over Kenny Creek, Camden, NSW (2005) Page 30

  31. Conclusion M-Lock Bridging System: • Versatile for wide range of applications • Minimal on-site activities • Economical • Easy to construct Page 31

More Related