1 / 19

Y. Pokhitonov , V. Kamachev V.G. Khlopin Radium Institute, Russia D. Kelley

U.S. Department of Energy’s Initiatives for Proliferation Prevention in Russia: Results of Radioactive Liquid Waste Treatment Project, Year 2. Y. Pokhitonov , V. Kamachev V.G. Khlopin Radium Institute, Russia D. Kelley Pacific Nuclear Solutions, USA. Purpose of Project.

ophira
Télécharger la présentation

Y. Pokhitonov , V. Kamachev V.G. Khlopin Radium Institute, Russia D. Kelley

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. U.S. Department of Energy’s Initiatives for Proliferation Prevention in Russia:Results of Radioactive Liquid Waste Treatment Project, Year 2 Y. Pokhitonov, V. Kamachev V.G. Khlopin Radium Institute, Russia D. Kelley Pacific Nuclear Solutions, USA

  2. Purpose of Project • IPP sponsored by DOE to engage Russian weapons scientists in peaceful use of existing and newly developed technologies (17 projects underway) • DOE’s IPP program is a mechanism for U.S. private sector companies to enter Russian market: radwaste treatment • Introduce USA environmental technology to weapons sector and seek joint technologies – first foreign firm • Investigate solutions for Russia & USA liquid radwaste problems resulting from Cold War • DOE compensates scientists to participate in program • Long-term, commercialize project, employ scientists

  3. Project Participants • Russia • Russian State Atomic Energy Corporation (ROSATOM) • VG Khlopin Radium Institute (project manager) • Seversk (SCC ), Zheleznogorsk (MCC), Ozersk (MAYAK), Gatchyna • 90+ participants, 68 weapons scientists • USA • Department of Energy (GIPP) • Argonne National Lab • Pacific Nuclear Solutions (project manager) • International Science & Technology Center (ISTC) • Project administrator, Moscow

  4. Polymer Technology • Variety of polymers for all organic, oil and aqueous streams • Solidification of LLW, ILW & HLW • Packaging: • Standard drums / B-25 box • Encapsulation in cement • Disposal options: • Short term, intermediate term • Final storage • Incineration • Advantages: • No special equipment, low cost to process / treat • High performance, long term stability, no degradation • Waste minimization: oil 2:1 or 3:1 bonding ratio (liquid : polymer) • Safe to use, safe for transport

  5. Solidification Process

  6. Experiments Stability (Differential Thermal Analysis) Irradiation Gas generation Polymer solidification /capacity / evaporation Encapsulation in cement

  7. Differential Thermal Analysis Polymers: N910, N930, N960 Solidified samples with nitric acid and sodium nitrate possess high thermal stability

  8. Irradiation Tests / Results • Extensive irradiation testing conducted, required for ROSATOM certification • Over 25 irradiation tests • All similar outcomes with China, USA tests • All high dose rates • Cobalt 60 gamma irradiator • One example: nitric / organic solution, solidified 30 rad per second 30 days = 77 M Rad + 73 days = 270 M Rad • Brittle, size reduction, no degradation / leaching • Conducted for gas generation tests

  9. Irradiation Tests

  10. Stability and Irradiation Cobalt 60, gamma installation, dose rate 3.9·10⁶ gray N960 polymer, HNO₃, 1M, after irradiation N910 polymer, oil + TBP, after irradiation

  11. Gas Generation Tests • Tests required to determine fire and explosion safety conditions • Tests carried out under static conditions in sealed glass ampoules • N960 polymer + nitric solution: no changes in the solidification and no gas release • N910 polymer + TBP / oil: variable results • Preliminary judgment: polymers are not gas generators

  12. Rate of gas release during irradiation of sample: N910 polymer + 50%-TBP / 50%-oil

  13. Solidified sample after addition of waterSolution: HNO₃ 1,0M No volumetric increase

  14. Polymer Solidification/ Capacity / Evaporation: Conclusions • Polymer technology is irreversible, liquid permanently immobilized in polymer matrix • Advantage: direct application of polymer to waste without conditioning / additives • Little or no volumetric increase in the process • Appreciable volume reduction through evaporation; no measurement of water vapor • Polymers slow the evaporation process • Polymers are versatile, solidify aqueous / organic waste of varying acidities, specific activities, suspensions and sludge types & salts

  15. Encapsulation of Polymer Solidification • Cementation tests at AREVA & Sellafield successfully completed, with 90% organic / 10% aqueous streams • When aqueous is above 10%, new technique for encapsulation is required • Encapsulation research underway: • additives to solidification • additives to cement • tests with inorganic materials encouraging

  16. Conclusions • Experiments conducted thus far provide greater understanding of polymer’s capabilities • Validates the polymer’s application with ILW / HLW waste • First actual project planned for 1st Q, 2011 • ILW aqueous waste with some organic material • Results of work 3 sub-sites will be presented in 2011

More Related