1 / 59

PHENIX Highlights

PHENIX Highlights. Stefan Bathe, QM2011. Measuring the Properties of the QGP. Conditions. Properties. Screening length .  . T i.  / s. d E / d x. CNM effects. Initial State. What I will show you today. v 2 of thermal direct photons Constrains T i and t 0

oprah
Télécharger la présentation

PHENIX Highlights

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. PHENIX Highlights Stefan Bathe, QM2011

  2. Measuring the Properties of the QGP Conditions Properties Screening length  Ti /s dE/dx CNM effects Initial State Stefan Bathe for PHENIX, QM2011

  3. What I will show you today • v2 of thermal direct photons • Constrains Tiand t0 • CNM effects in d+Au • Density dependence of shadowing from J/y • Reconstructed jets • Low-x suppression from forward di-hadron correlations • v3 • Disentangle initial state from h/s • Implications for 2-particle correlations • E loss • Path-length dependence • Results from energy scan Stefan Bathe for PHENIX, QM2011

  4. Measuring the Properties of the QGP Conditions Properties Screening length  ~ 0 Ti /s dE/dx CNM effects Initial State Stefan Bathe for PHENIX, QM2011

  5. Measuring the Properties of the QGP Conditions Properties Screening length  ~ 0 Ti /s dE/dx CNM effects Initial State Stefan Bathe for PHENIX, QM2011

  6. Direct Photon Excess in Au+Au NLO Vogelsang √sNN = 200 GeV yield p+p PRL 104, 132301 (2010) Stefan Bathe for PHENIX, QM2011

  7. Direct Photon Excess in Au+Au • Direct photon excess above p+p spectrum • Exponential (consistent with thermal) • Inverse slope = 220 ± 20 MeV • Ti from hydro • 300 . . . 600 MeV • Depending on thermalization time NLO Vogelsang √sNN = 200 GeV Au+Au min. bias yield p+p PRL 104, 132301 (2010) Stefan Bathe for PHENIX, QM2011

  8. Critical d+Au Check • New: • no exponential excess in d+Au • Poster: Y. Yamaguchi Stefan Bathe for PHENIX, QM2011

  9. Direct photon v2 further constrains Ti • expected v2 : • prompt photons: 0 (time zero) • thermal photons Hydro after t0 early late • small • (flow not built up) • large • (like hadrons) Chatterjee, Srivastava PRC79, 021901 (2009) Stefan Bathe for PHENIX, QM2011

  10. Direct Photon v2 Statistical subtraction inclusive photon v2 - decay photon v2 = direct photon v2 Au+Au@200 GeV minimum bias preliminary • inclusive photon v2 Stefan Bathe for PHENIX, QM2011

  11. Direct Photon v2 • p0v2 similar to inclusive photon v2 • Two possibilities • A: there are no direct photons • B: direct photon v2 similar to inclusive photon v2 • Key: precise measurement of direct photon excess Au+Au@200 GeV minimum bias preliminary • p0v2 • inclusive photon v2 Stefan Bathe for PHENIX, QM2011

  12. Direct Photon v2 Au+Au@200 GeV minimum bias • direct photon v2 large (~15 %) at pT =2.5 GeV • v2  0 where prompt photons dominate Direct photon v2 preliminary Stefan Bathe for PHENIX, QM2011

  13. Theory Comparison: Direct Photon v2 Theory calculation: Holopainen, Räsänen, Eskola arXiv:1104.5371v1 preliminary • Models under-predict direct photon v2 • Measurement further constrains Tiandti • Challenge to theorists • Plenary: S. Esumi (flow), Tue • Parallel: E. Kistenev (direct photons) Thu Stefan Bathe for PHENIX, QM2011

  14. Measuring the Properties of the QGP Conditions Properties Screening length  ~ 0 Ti =300-600 MeV /s dE/dx CNM effects Initial State Stefan Bathe for PHENIX, QM2011

  15. Measuring the Properties of the QGP Conditions Properties Screening length  ~ 0 Ti =300-600 MeV /s dE/dx CNM effects Initial State Stefan Bathe for PHENIX, QM2011

  16. Cold Nuclear Matter Effects • Important for interpretation of HI data • Measure Cold Nuclear Matter (CNM) effects in d+Au collisions • RHIC versatile • Can collide any nuclear species on any other Stefan Bathe for PHENIX, QM2011

  17. J/y in d+Au: Shadowing non-linear • EPS09 shadowing with linear dependence on nuclear thickness matches for central collisions • Overpredicts suppression for peripheral collisions • RCP shows this clearly • Thickness (impact parameter) dependence of shadowing is non-linear! arXiv:1010.1246 1010.1246 • Plenary: C. Luiz da Silva (heavy flavor), Fri • Parallel: A. Sen (quarkonia) Tue Theory calculations: Eskola, Paukkunen, Salgado, JHEP04, 065 Vogt, PRC71, 054902 Kharzeev , Tuchin, NPA770, 40 Kharzeev ,Tuchin, NPA735, 248 Stefan Bathe for PHENIX, QM2011

  18. Reconstructed Jets in d+Au Stefan Bathe for PHENIX, QM2011

  19. Reconstructed Jets in d+Au at the p+p uncorrected scale • Jet Rcp in central d+Au modified • - caution: this is not RdA! • consistent with p0Rcp • anti-shadowing? • Parallel: N. Grau (gamma-hadron, jets) Tue • Poster: D. Perepelitsa (jets in dAu)

  20. Forward di-hadroncorrelations Color Glass Condensate? new forward EM calorimeter |h| = 3.0-3.8 Pocket formula: Stefan Bathe for PHENIX, QM2011

  21. Initial state low-x gluon suppression Di-hadron suppression factor peripheral central smaller x Stefan Bathe for PHENIX, QM2011

  22. Initial state low-x gluon suppression • Di-hadrons suppressed at low x • Important for interpretation of HI results Di-hadron suppression factor peripheral central smaller x • Parallel: M. Chiu (small x dAucorrel) Thu • Poster: Z. Citron (small x dAu correlations) Stefan Bathe for PHENIX, QM2011

  23. Measuring the Properties of the QGP Conditions Properties Screening length  ~ 0 • Ti =300-600 MeV /s dE/dx non-linear shadowing low-x suppression anti-shadowing? CNM effects Initial State Stefan Bathe for PHENIX, QM2011

  24. Measuring the Properties of the QGP Conditions Properties Screening length  ~ 0 • Ti =300-600 MeV /s dE/dx non-linear shadowing low-x suppression anti-shadowing? CNM effects Initial State Stefan Bathe for PHENIX, QM2011

  25. Initial State determines flow strength Glauber CGC Radial gluon distribution 2-D density profile Initial state determines v2 strength (largest uncertainty) Smaller eccentricity larger eccentricity Disentangle initial conditions from flow strength Stefan Bathe for PHENIX, QM2011

  26. v3 has fluctuations origin arXiv:1105.3928 arXiv:1105.3928 central: v3 = v2 mid-central: v3 < v2 weak centrality dependence of v3 => fluctuations origin Stefan Bathe for PHENIX, QM2011

  27. v3disentangles initial state and /s v2 described by Glauber and CGC Theory calculation: Alver et al. PRC82,034913   arXiv:1105.3928 • Glauber • Glauber initial state • /s = 1/4p • KLN • CGC initial state • /s = 2/4p Two models Stefan Bathe for PHENIX, QM2011

  28. v3disentangles initial state and /s v2 described by Glauber and CGC • v3 described only by Glauber Theory calculation: Alver et al. PRC82,034913   arXiv:1105.3928 arXiv:1105.3928 Theory calculation: Alver et al. PRC82,034913   Lappi, Venugopalan, PRC74, 054905 Drescher, Nara, PRC76, 041903 • Glauber • Glauber initial state • /s = 1/4p • MC-KLN • CGC initial state • /s = 2/4p Two models Stefan Bathe for PHENIX, QM2011

  29. v3disentangles initial state and /s v2 described by Glauber and CGC • v3 described only by Glauber Theory calculation: Alver et al. PRC82,034913   arXiv:1105.3928 arXiv:1105.3928 Theory calculation: Alver et al. PRC82,034913   Lappi, Venugopalan, PRC74, 054905 Drescher, Nara, PRC76, 041903 favored • Glauber • Glauber initial state • /s = 1/4p • MC-KLN • CGC initial state • /s = 2/4p Two models Stefan Bathe for PHENIX, QM2011 • Plenary: S. Esumi, Tue • Parallel: R. Lacey (v3, jet shape) Mon

  30. v3 explains double-hump correction • v2 correction only • double-hump Stefan Bathe for PHENIX, QM2011

  31. v3 explains double-hump correction correction • v2 correction only • double-hump • v2, v3, v4 correction • double-hump disappeared • Peak still broadened • Plenary: S. Esumi, Tue • Parallel: R. Lacey (v3, jet shape) Mon Stefan Bathe for PHENIX, QM2011

  32. Measuring the Properties of the QGP Conditions Properties Screening length  ~ 0 ? • Ti =300-600 MeV /s1/4p dE/dx non-linear shadowing low-x suppression anti-shadowing? CNM effects Initial State Glauber ? ? Stefan Bathe for PHENIX, QM2011

  33. Measuring the Properties of the QGP Conditions Properties Screening length  ~ 0 • Ti =300-600 MeV /s1/4p dE/dx non-linear shadowing low-x suppression anti-shadowing? CNM effects Initial State Glauber ? Stefan Bathe for PHENIX, QM2011

  34. Path-length dependence of E loss v2 not explained by pQCD (even with fluctuations & saturation) pQCD PRL 105, 142301 pQCD AdS/CFT Theory calculations: Wicks et al., NPA784, 426 Marquet, Renk, PLB685, 270 Drees, Feng, Jia, PRC71, 034909 Jia, Wei, arXiv:1005.0645 RAA explained by both models

  35. Path-length dependence of E loss V2 explained by cubic path length dependence (AdS/CFT) v2 not explained by pQCD (even with fluctuations & saturation) AdS/CFT pQCD PRL 105, 142301 pQCD AdS/CFT Theory calculations: Wicks et al., NPA784, 426 Marquet, Renk, PLB685, 270 Drees, Feng, Jia, PRC71, 034909 Jia, Wei, arXiv:1005.0645 RAA explained by both models

  36. Path-length dependence of E loss v2explained by cubic path length dependence (like AdS/CFT) v2 not explained by pQCD (even with fluctuations & saturation) AdS/CFT pQCD PRL 105, 142301 pQCD AdS/CFT Theory calculations: Wicks et al., NPA784, 426 Marquet, Renk, PLB685, 270 Drees, Feng, Jia, PRC71, 034909 Jia, Wei, arXiv:1005.0645 RAA explained by both models

  37. Path-length dependence of E loss v2explained by cubic path length dependence (like AdS/CFT) v2 not explained by pQCD (even with fluctuations & saturation) AdS/CFT pQCD v2 data favors dE/dx ~ l3(like AdS/CFT) PRL 105, 142301 pQCD AdS/CFT Theory calculations: Wicks et al., NPA784, 426 Marquet, Renk, PLB685, 270 Drees, Feng, Jia, PRC71, 034909 Jia, Wei, arXiv:1005.0645 • Plenary: M. Purschke (R_AA) Wen • Parallel: N. Grau (gamma-hadron, jets) Tue • Parallel: D. Sharma (light vector mesons) Mon • Poster: M. Tannenbaum (E loss RHIC vs. LHC) RAA explained by both models

  38. g-h: fragmentation function in Au+Au • p+p consistent with e++e- • Au+Au consistent with E loss model Tasso: Braunschweig et al. , Z. Phys. 320 C47, 187 MLA: Borghini, Wiedemann, hep-ph/0506218 hadrons g • Parallel: N. Grau (gamma-hadron, jets) Tue • Poster: M. Tannenbaum (E loss RHIC vs. LHC) Stefan Bathe for PHENIX, QM2011

  39. Measuring the Properties of the QGP Conditions Properties Screening length  ~ 0 ? • Ti =300-600 MeV /s1/4p dE/dx l3 non-linear shadowing low-x suppression anti-shadowing? CNM effects Initial State Glauber ? Stefan Bathe for PHENIX, QM2011

  40. Measuring the Properties of the QGP Conditions Properties Screening length  ~ 0 ? • Ti =300-600 MeV /s1/4p dE/dx  l3 non-linear shadowing low-x suppression anti-shadowing? CNM effects Initial State Glauber ? Stefan Bathe for PHENIX, QM2011

  41. v2, v3, v4independence of sNN(for 39, 62, 200 GeV) v2, v3, v4independence of sNNfor 39, 62.4, 200 GeV Just like at 200 GeV, disentangle initial state and /s Stefan Bathe for PHENIX, QM2011

  42. v2 saturation with sNN v2 saturation 39 GeV Preliminary, STAR, PHENIX and E895 data ALICE pT = 1.7 GeV pT = 0.7 GeV • Plenary: S. Esumi, Tue • Parallel: R. Lacey (v3, jet shape) Mon • Parallel: X. Gong (energy scan: bulk) Fri • Poster: S. Mizuno (PID v3) [PHENIX] Phys.Rev.Lett.94:232302,2005 Need updated plot from Arkadij 103 104 Stefan Bathe for PHENIX, QM2011

  43. sNN dependence of energy loss preliminary PRL101, 232301 • Plenary: M. Purschke (R_AA) Wen • Parallel: N. Novitsky (energy scan) Fri • Poster: O. Chvala (RAA in 39 and 62 GeV) • RAAsuppressed also at 39 GeV • RAA at 62 GeV approaches 200 GeV level at high pT Stefan Bathe for PHENIX, QM2011

  44. Measuring the Properties of the QGP Conditions Properties Screening length  ~ 0 ? • Ti =300-600 MeV /s1/4p dE/dx  l3 non-linear shadowing low-x suppression anti-shadowing? CNM effects Initial State Glauber ? Stefan Bathe for PHENIX, QM2011

  45. Near-Term Future: Silicon Vertex Detector • VTX successfully commissioned in 2011 p+p run • VTX taking data in Au+Au now! • RAA of c, b separately • v2 of c, b separately • Jet tomography (di-hadron, g-h, c-h, c-c) Status Data: p+p@500 GeV, 2011 beam profile s ~ 100mm Physics - Stefan Bathe for PHENIX, QM2011

  46. Near-Term Future: Silicon Vertex Detector • VTX successfully commissioned in 2011 p+p run • VTX taking data in Au+Au now! • RAA of c, b separately • v2 of c, b separately • Jet tomography (di-hadron, g-h, c-h, c-c) Status Data: Au+Au@200 GeV, 2011 beam profile s ~ 100mm • Parallel: A. Sickles (Decadal Plan) Thu • Poster: M. Chiu (Fast TOF, 10 ps) • Poster: M. Kurosawa (VTX (pixel)) • Poster: T.Hachiya (VTX (pixel)) • Poster: R. Akimoto (VTX (pixel)) Physics - Stefan Bathe for PHENIX, QM2011

  47. What I could not cover in this talk • Ti • Plenary: S. Esumi, Tue • Parallel: E. Kistenev (direct photons) Thu • Poster: Y. Yamaguchi (direct photons dAu) • v3, jet shape, h/s • Plenary: S. Esumi, Tue • Parallel: R. Lacey (v3, jet shape) Mon • Parallel: X. Gong (energy scan: bulk) Fri • Poster: S. Mizuno (PID v3) • Chiral Symmetry • Parallel: M. Makek (Results from HBD) Thu • Heavy Flavor • Plenary: C. Luizda Silva, Fri • Parallel: A. Sen (quarkonia) Tue • Parallel: M. Durham (open heavy flavor) Fri • Poster: S. Whitaker (Upsilon RAA) • Poster: A. Takahara (J/psi photoproduction) • Poster: H. Thewman (high pTsingle e in p+p) • Energy Loss • Plenary: M. Purschke (R_AA) Wen • Parallel: N. Grau (gamma-hadron, jets) Tue • Parallel: N. Novitsky (energy scan) Fri • Parallel: D. Sharma (light vector mesons) Mon • Poster: M. Tannenbaum (E loss RHIC vs. LHC) • Poster: O. Chvala (RAA in 39 and 62 GeV) • Parallel: D. Sharma (light vector mesons) Mon • Cold nuclear matter • Parallel: M. Chiu (small x dAucorrel) Thu • Parallel: J. Kamin (dAudileptons) Fri • Poster: Z. Citron (small x dAu correlations) • Poster: D. Perepelitsa (jets in dAu) • Future • Parallel: A. Sickles (Decadal Plan) Thu • Poster: M. Chiu (Fast TOF, 10 ps) • Poster:M. Kurosawa (VTX (pixel)) • Poster: T.Hachiya (VTX (pixel)) • Poster: R. Akimoto (VTX (pixel))

  48. Conclusions • v2 of thermal direct photons large • Further constrains Tiand t0 • CNM effects in d+Au • Non-linear density dependence of shadowing from J/y • Reconstructed jet Rcp modified • Low-x suppression from forward di-hadron correlations • v3 • Disentangle initial state from h/s • Double-hump disappears in 2-particle correlations • Energy loss • Cubic path-length dependence • Energy Scan • v2saturation 39 GeV • RAA suppressed alsoat 39 GeV Thank you! Stefan Bathe for PHENIX, QM2011

  49. Backup Stefan Bathe for PHENIX, QM2011

  50. Jet-p0 comparison d+Au • p0Rcpcalculated from published RdA • Consistent in overlapping pT range Stefan Bathe for PHENIX, QM2011

More Related