1 / 45

Health and Development

Health and Development. Health and development. An observation: health and wealth are correlated both across countries and across people within societies. Why? Question #1: What is the impact of income on health and nutrition?

orien
Télécharger la présentation

Health and Development

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Health and Development

  2. Health and development • An observation: health and wealth are correlated both across countries and across people within societies. Why? • Question #1: What is the impact of income on health and nutrition? • Question #2: What is the impact of health/nutrition on economic outcomes? • Question #3: Which policies / institutions improve the delivery of public health services in poor countries?

  3. The health-wealth relationship • Disentangling the relationships between health and wealth and uncovering causal relationships in either direction is very tricky • Fundamental endogeneity problem • Measurement issues • Health: inputs (nutrition, expenditure) or output (health status) • Proper measurement of inputs: adjustment for quality, wastage • Wealth: short or long run? Measurement error in income • Functional form: non-linearities are key to the story, but it may not be possible to observe them • Table 1 (Strauss and Thomas): Wide variety in the estimates of the elasticities of calorie demand with respect to household resources (0.01 to 0.82)

  4. Income and expenditure elasticities of calorie demand

  5. Deaton and Subramanian (1996) • Nonparametric approach to examining the impact of wealth on health • Data set: 5,630 households in 563 villages • Recall data on 149 food items, meals taken out and given away, etc. • From those 149 food items, they calculate caloric intake using a conversion table. Also correct for meals taken out and meals given to people. • Interesting aspect of this work: non-parametric estimates y = g(x) + e • How can we estimate g(x)? • Kernel regression • Fan (1992) locally weighted regression

  6. Results • Positive relationship between income and nutrition, precisely estimated even non-parametrically • The elasticity declines with outlay, but not dramatically. Sample of poor people. • Price per calories paid increase with outlay. Richer households pay more per calorie • Rich: 1.50 rupees per 1000 calories • Average: 1.14 rupees per 1000 calories • Poor: 0.88 rupees • Price elasticity of calories seems constant

  7. Calories vs. expenditure (nonparametrics)

  8. Price per calorie vs. expenditure (nonparam.)

  9. Parametric analysis

  10. Main takeaways in Deaton and Subramanian • Nutrition does increase with per capita PCE • Elasticity of calories declines with PCE, from 0.65 to 0.4 • But they do substitute towards more expensive calories • Income elasticity of food expenditure about 0.75, roughly evenly split between increased calories and increased price per calorie • Implausible that malnutrition is the cause of poverty, rather than vice versa: adequate nutrition can be purchased for 4% of daily wage • Nice exploration of data, but endogeneity problem is not solved here

  11. Health and development • An observation: health and wealth are correlated both across countries and across people within societies. Why? • Question #1: What is the impact of income on health and nutrition? • Question #2: What is the impact of health/nutrition on economic outcomes? • Question #3: Which policies / institutions improve the delivery of public health services in poor countries?

  12. Under the Weather: Health, Schooling, and Socioeconomic Consequences of Early-Life Rainfall Sharon Maccini University of Michigan Dean Yang University of Michigan

  13. Motivation • Life in rural areas of developing countries is prone to many kinds of risk • In addition to short-run effects, consequences of certain shocks may be felt many years or even decades later • Important for targeting of public resources that help cushion impact of shocks • Health shocks at the earliest stages of life, by affecting long-run health human capital, may have effects that extend into adulthood

  14. Pigs

  15. This paper … • Examines the long-run impact of exogenous environmental shocks in early life • Rainfall shocks in locality and year of birth, for Indonesian adults • Health as well as socioeconomic outcomes • Compares long-run impact of shocks experienced at different points in early life • Tests for the existence of “critical periods” in child development • Provides suggestive evidence on the pathways through which early-life rainfall affects adult outcomes

  16. Summary of results • For women, 20% higher birthyear rainfall leads to: • Better health: 0.57 centimeters greater height, 3.8 percentage points less likely to report poor/very poor health • More education: 0.22 more completed grades of schooling • Improved socioeconomic status: 0.12 standard deviation higher asset index in household • No corresponding effects for men, possibly due to gender bias in household resource allocation in hard times • Rainfall in the first year of life has greatest effect on adult outcomes • Evidence consistent with the following chain of causation: Early-life rainfall  infant health  schooling  adult SES

  17. Critical-period programming • Exposure to certain stimuli during a sensitive time span may have irreversible effects on living organisms • “Fetal origins hypothesis”: The fetal stage and infancy are critical periods in human physical development • Early-life shocks can have long-lasting effects on health (Barker 1998) • Faced with poor nutrition/health conditions, limited resources prioritized for brain, compromising physical growth and development of other organ systems • Individuals are “programmed” for smaller body size, worse health later in life • Evidence: • Animal studies (see figures) • Epidemiological research in human populations • But causality often questionable

  18. Critical periods in rat nutrition Source: Figures 2.2 and 2.3, Barker (1998)

  19. Critical periods in rat nutrition Source: Figures 2.2 and 2.3, Barker (1998)

  20. Identifying the impact of early-life shocks • Relate later life outcomes to early-life health conditions • e.g., cross-sectional differences in birthplace infant mortality, individual self-reported health status  Open to omitted variable concerns • Examine impact of shocks to health conditions at birth • e.g., within-twin birthweight differences, epidemics  Difficult to generalize results from unusual events  Data often a serious limitation • We examine impact of an important source of environmental variation in developing countries: rainfall • Using high-quality survey data in IFLS

  21. Contemporaneous impact of rainfall • Higher rainfall raises agricultural productivity in Indonesia • Secondary sources verify that droughts are associated with food insecurity historically • Levine and Yang (2006): positive rainfall shocks associated with increases in rice output across Indonesian districts in 1990s • Higher agricultural output should lead to higher household income • Better ability to purchase nutrition, health inputs and otherwise nurturing environments for infants

  22. Regression equation • For outcome Yijst for individual i born in district j in season s of year t: Yijst = qRjt + mjs + pst + gjsTREND + eijst • Rainfall shock Rjt is at district-year level • Birthdistrict-season fixed effects (mjs) account for time-invariant differences across people born in the same district in the same season • Birthyear-season (cohort) fixed effects (pst) account for Indonesia-wide shocks • District-season-specific linear time trends absorb long-running linear trends in outcomes that vary across districts • Mainly helps absorb residual variation

  23. Measurement error • Rainfall is measured at the closest weather station to the birth district in the birth year • But is only imperfectly correlated with actual rainfall in the individual’s birth locality • Leads to attenuated coefficient estimates • Solution: instrument early-life rainfall with similar variables whose errors are likely to be orthogonal • Instruments: early-life rainfall in 2nd- through 5th-closest weather stations to birth district in birth year

  24. Data • Indonesia Family Life Survey (IFLS) • Adults observed in wave 3 (2000): ~4,600 women, ~4,300 men born outside of major cities between 1953-1974 • Anthropometrics, other health outcomes, socioeconomic outcomes • Global Historical Climatology Network (GHCN) Precipitation and Temperature Data (Version 3) • National Climatic Data Center, NOAA • Contains monthly rainfall records at 200+ rainfall stations in Indonesia • Each IFLS birth district matched with closest rainfall station • Rainfall variable: log rainfall - log mean district rainfall (from 1953-1999)

  25. Early-life rainfall and adult health

  26. Early-life rainfall and other outcomes

  27. Nonparametric estimates

  28. Nonparametric estimates

  29. Effect of rainfall before and after birthyear

  30. Potential selection concerns • Potential negative bias • High rainfall  differential survival of weakest infants • Potential positive bias: • High-SES parents may time births to occur during good rainfall years • Unlikely that parents can forecast rainfall so far in advance • Also: controlling for past rainfall doesn’t change results • Tests for selection: • Is early-life rainfall associated with size of cohorts observed in our data? • Is early-life rainfall associated with parental education?

  31. Rainfall and inclusion in sample

  32. Rainfall and parental characteristics

  33. Pathways to adult SES

  34. In closing • For women, higher early-life rainfall leads to better health, higher educational attainment, and improved socioeconomic status • No corresponding effects for men • Likely pathway to adult SES is via schooling • Link to consumption smoothing literature • Does not mean that consumption smoothing mechanisms were not operative • But does suggest that they were only partially effective, and this partial failure had long-run effects • Implications for policy • Identifies a group—female infants—whose later-life fortunes are strongly tied to early-life conditions • Justification for interventions that shield infants from the health consequences of temporary environmental and economic shocks • E.g., weather insurance, social insurance schemes, public health investments, food security policies

  35. Health and development • An observation: health and wealth are correlated both across countries and across people within societies. Why? • Question #1: What is the impact of income on health and nutrition? • Question #2: What is the impact of health/nutrition on economic outcomes? • Question #3: Which policies / institutions improve the delivery of public health services in poor countries?

  36. Health inputs and health • Question: why might there be scope for public intervention in the health sector? In other words, why don’t households provide the necessary health investments themselves privately? • Within-household agency problems or imperfect parental altruism towards children • Positive treatment externalities • Poor (or incorrect) knowledge of new health technologies among individuals • Credit constraints prevent good health investments

  37. Kremer and Miguel (2004) • Worm infections (e.g., hookworm, whipworm, roundworm, schistosomiasis) are among the world’s most common infections • Paper studies school-based deworming treatment • In sample of rural Kenyan school children, over 90% were infected at baseline. Between one third and one half had “serious” infections • Worms pass larvae out through human fecal matter, infecting others • Treatment generates a positive externality by reducing this transmission to others

  38. Study set-up • 75 primary schools, over 30,000 children (aged 6-18) • Deworming treatment (drugs, health education) phased in randomly across three treatment groups • Groups are similar along observables • Listed school alphabetically (by zone), and counted off 1-2-3, 1-2-3, etc. • Thus the placement of schools into groups was not done by a random number generator, but is completely arbitrary and orthogonal to omitted variables • Group 1: treatment 1998 and 1999 • Group 2: no treatment 1998, treatment 1999 • Group 3: no treatment in 1998 or 1999

  39. Table 1

  40. Table V: Simple T vs. C comparison(no account for externalities)

  41. Estimating externalities • One of the goals of the paper is to compare the naive treatment effect estimator, “Treatment minus comparison”, E( Yij | T1i =1) – E( Yij | T1i =0), to estimators that take into account “contamination” of the experiment from externalities • This contamination may produce gains in the comparison group • Externalities would lead to doubly under-estimating treatment effects • Miss impacts in the comparison group • Understate impacts in the treatment group • A real concern in existing studies that randomize within schools and often found no significant impact

  42. Regression equation

  43. Table VII: Externality estimates

  44. Table IX

  45. Table X: No effect on test scores

More Related