100 likes | 243 Vues
This study examines the role of student feedback in the PeerWise system and its correlation with exam performance. Analyzing data from courses like Physics 1A (2012-13), we assess how the number and quality of comments influence exam scores. Findings indicate that each high-quality comment is linked to a 0.35% increase in exam scores, with a minimum of six comments correlating to a 2% increase. Overall, meaningful engagement in PeerWise showed a significant positive association with academic success, despite minimal instructor intervention.
E N D
The benefits of giving feedback: investigating patterns of student exchanges over the PeerWisesystemAlisonKay and Judy Hardy
Which activity is most strongly associated with exam performance? DV: Exam score IV: Number of answers or comments made
Example: Physics 1A 2012-13 Is writing quality comments associated with higher exam performance when controlling for other factors? Dependent Variable:Exam score Independent Variables: No. comments coded > 4 Pre-test mark (FCI) Scottish Major Gender
Building the model The model predicts that each new high quality comment, is associated with a 0.35% increase in exam score. The minimum 6 comments associated with a 2% increase . The mean of 14 comments associated with a 5% increase.
Conclusions Total engagement with PeerWise far exceeded minimum requirements Across all disciplines, writing meaningful comments has a significant, positive association with exam performance when controlling for other known influential factors Especially interesting given that PeerWise requires minimal instructor intervention; that PeerWise is only worth ~4% of the total course mark; and that providing feedback is only one aspect of the PeerWise assessment