1 / 19

ATLAS

ATLAS. Articulated Transfer Linked Audit System. ATLAS Presentation Overview. Introduction Planning Campus Participation & Funding Campus ATLAS Plan Elements Software and Hardware Installation Training Communication Teams Survey Analysis MOU’s Future Meetings. ATLAS Introduction.

osborn
Télécharger la présentation

ATLAS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ATLAS Articulated Transfer Linked Audit System

  2. ATLAS Presentation Overview • Introduction • Planning Campus Participation & Funding • Campus ATLAS Plan Elements • Software and Hardware Installation • Training • Communication • Teams • Survey Analysis • MOU’s • Future Meetings

  3. ATLAS Introduction • Assists students & counselors consider transferring credits between: • Schools • Academic Programs • Gateway to campus’ • Automated transfer articulation processes • Automated degree audit processes • Campus sites that assist planning transfers • Web based with lots of optional features • Each campus charts own timing and path

  4. Planning Campus Participation • Campus ATLAS Plan • Prepared by campus ATLAS team • Current Status • Planned End-of-Phase 1 Status • Timeline with milestones • Audit and articulation accuracy is more important than initial implementation • Interdependence of all campuses in the system

  5. Campus ATLAS Plan Elements -Areas to cover in Timeline • Automate Articulation Rules using your SIS • Automate Degree Audit Rules using your SIS • CAS Startup • Implement each CAS Feature selected for your campus • Other campus-specific, ATLAS-related • On-Campus promotion(s)

  6. Example Campus Plan – Articulation & Degree Audits

  7. Example Campus Plan – CAS

  8. Campus ATLAS Plan Elements -CAS Implementation • For each selected CAS Feature • In test mode • Appropriate disclaimers • Adjust configuration and web aspects • Install interface (if applicable) • Add feature to training & user manuals • Train & Test • Cutover to production • Get the word out at your campus

  9. CAS Server • Determine logistics for server(s) • Negotiate licensing agreements with vendors • Software/Hardware Installation (Centrally Coordinated) • Install CAS • Test • Ready for campus use – projected date: 5/31/06

  10. Implementation Considerations • DARS/CAPP • Which interfaces? • Web • Currency of information • Disclaimers • Common access, statewide front-page for all users • Campus CAS introductory page • Consistent course numbers • All Receiving campuses use same as Sending campus

  11. Funding - Statewide • Chancellor’s office funding covers: • CAS License (OUS only) • Planning Guide Interface License (OUS only) • Import Transcript Interface License (OUS & CC) • CAPP Interface/contingency • Project Coordination & some training & promotion

  12. Funding - For Campuses • Chancellor’s office also provides: • Vendor installation-related fees • Both interfaces for OUS Campuses • Import Transcript interface for 2 or 3 CC Campuses • Assistance automating articulation & degree audits (OUS Campuses only) Notes: • Funding is contingent upon campus plans • June 30, 2007 Funding deadline(promotion expected in fall 2007)

  13. Funding - Recurring Costs • Chancellor’s office funding supports initial development and implementation, only • Campuses will have to immediately support recurring costs for: • Articulation agreement maintenance • Automated transfer articulations maintenance • Automated degree audit maintenance • ATLAS related IT labor, software & hardware

  14. Training • Determine Training Needs • To use CAPP (or DARS) • To Configure CAS • 1 or 2 people per campus (web-based) • To use CAS (later in the process) • Advisors • Students • Possible Approaches • Train trainer & travel to campuses • Web based • Attend outside classes

  15. Communication • Communication with Vendors • Our IT and Functional spokespersons • Project Communications • What are your preferences? What works? • Publicity (to occur later): • Local or statewide (or both)? • Who are the audiences? • Which methods? • What exists now that could be used? • What else must be developed? • Who is responsible and who pays?

  16. Team Structures • Campuses should determine local teams, likely to include: • Administration • Degree audit/certification • Transfer articulation • Advising • IT support • Student(s)? • Campuses select one ATLAS delegate for Steering Committee (along with another for IDTS) • Working groups (up to 6 campus reps per group) • Articulation • IT • Others needed?

  17. Survey Analysis & Discussion • Review the synthesized results • What patterns do you notice in the responses to each question? • What clarifications are needed to determine the “real answers” to unclear or incomplete responses? • What issues need further discussion? • What additional questions emerge from the survey responses? • Implications (drawn from group discussion):

  18. MOU Discussion • To stay friends by developing common expectations, especially about exchanging money • Primary transactions to make clear: • Distribution of CO funds • Financial point person • Payment for recurring software fees • Payment for centrally provided, on-going services • Other? • Timeframe for meeting with each campus

  19. Future Meetings and Q&A • Steering Committee Meetings • March 29th in Portland • April 26th in Eugene • May 24th in Portland • Last week of July • Last week of October • Last week of January • Articulation Working Group • When? • IT Working Group • When?

More Related