200 likes | 328 Vues
This study investigates the dynamics of communication within online collaborative design studios. It explores the differences between face-to-face (F2F) and Internet-mediated communication (IMC), analyzing their impact on student behavior, motivation, and performance. By focusing on participation metrics and employing action research methodologies, we aim to enhance design education practices. The framework established includes content structuring, data sharing, critique processes, and evaluation. This research contributes valuable insights into improving online learning environments for design students, emphasizing effective communication and collaboration.
E N D
Situation & Planning Wenzhi Chen 2004.07.14
Content • Situation • Research planning & discussion
Situation • Paper writing • The participation and communication of online collaborative design project • Data analysis • Participation: log times, period, posts, reading … • Grade • Reference reading • Writing • Thinking
Research planning • Research focus • Action research experiment • Thinking of topics • The content in design studio • The communication in design studio
The role of Internet in design studio • Communication channel & media • Design resources • Data & information share & exchange • Design display & exhibition
The framework of ODLE COURSE Objective Material Activity Delivery LEANER Motivation Participation Performance INSTRUCTOR Pedagogy Strategy Evaluation Online Design Learning Environment Organization Process Subject Access INTERNET Limitation Capability Cost Object
Content in design studio Knowledge / Technique Delivery Receive Case Demo Practice Instructor Media Learner Discussion & Critique
Content in design studio Content Inside design studio Instructor Lecture notes Textbook Demo Sample . Video Magazine Learner Drawing Report Model . . Photos Magazine Outside design studio
Content in design studio • Dynamic design content • A systematic structure • A framework of the data record, critique, evaluation, shared, and exchange • Knowledge management • How?
Communication in design studio • Compare the difference between face-to-face (F2F) and Internet mediate communication (IMC) • Find the problem of the FTF & IMC
Student Student Student Tutor Communication in design studio Peer discussion Critique
Communication in design studio Problem Student Student / Tutor
Communication in design studio Problem Internet Student Student / Tutor
Communication in design studio • Factors • Action • Behavior • Cognition • Creative • Performance • Motivation
Communication in design studio • Methods • Experiment • Protocol analysis (content analysis / coding scheme) • Interview • Subjects • Student • Tutor
Communication in design studio • Experiment design • Independent variables: communication methods (F2F/IMC) • Task: collaborative concept design (S-S), critique (S-T) • Dependant variables: actions, behavior, cognition, creative, performance, motivation
Communication in design studio • CD (F2F) C (F2F) • CD (F2F) C (IMC) • CD (IMC) C (F2F) • CD (IMC) C (IMC)
Communication in design studio Preparation Document Demo Introduction Warm-up practice Experiment F2F / IMC S-S / S-T Development the concept design, then critic by tutor to select the final concept. Video record All the process Concept design Critique Design decision Evaluation Interview & survey Design Evaluation