1 / 24

DoD’s Common Test Interface (CTI)

DoD’s Common Test Interface (CTI). David Droste DRS Test and Energy Management Mike Stora System Interconnect Technologies. Background. CIWG Report was Published 9/30/96 CIWG was a Government-Funded IPT

osgood
Télécharger la présentation

DoD’s Common Test Interface (CTI)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. DoD’s Common Test Interface (CTI) David Droste DRS Test and Energy Management Mike Stora System Interconnect Technologies

  2. Background • CIWG Report was Published 9/30/96 • CIWG was a Government-Funded IPT • Identified ATS Mass Termination Interface as a “Critical” Interface in Need of a Solution • Indication an Open-Architecture, Multi-Vendor, Standards Based Interface was Needed • See SCC-20/HIWG Web Site: http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/scc20/hiwg/ • IEEE Standards Coordinating Committee 20 and TC5 of the IEEE IMS Co-Sponsored the Receiver-Fixture Interface (RFI) Effort • Has Become a Family of Standards Efforts

  3. USAF NAVY Challenge AF ATS CASS • Interoperability • Low Cost COTS Availability • Performance Repeatability • Minimum Maint/Support • Standardized Packaging • Spiral Development • Commercial and Military Applicability 1990’s 1980’s - TETS IFTE ARMY USMC General Purpose, Large, Dedicated ATE DoD Challenge to Define: Common Test Interface

  4. IEEE-Std-1505 RFI – Step One • Defines Framework • Achieves Compatibility/Interoperability Between Manufacturers • Defines All Requirements/Qualifications/Dimensions/Electrical Parameters • Supports Scalability • Bench-Top to Multi-bay Test System Applicability • Defines Segmented vs Non-Segmented • Defines a Multitude of Connector Module Types Applicable to the RFI System

  5. IEEE-Std-1505 RFI Scalable Architecture

  6. IEEE-Std-1505 RFI Segmentation Continuous (Non-Segmented) Framework Section Segmented Framework Section

  7. Connector Modules RFI Specification - Sections (Clauses) 7-12 Give Connector Module Details • Clause 7 – 200 pin, Single Slot Signal Module • Clause 8 – Power Module Size 8 & 16 Contacts • Mixed 8/16 – 45ea. 23Amp & 4ea. 45Amp • Size 16 • 59 Contact Single Slot • 152 Contact Two Slot • Clause 9 – Coax Module (3 or 5 GHz) Size 16 Contacts • 59 Contact Single Slot • 152 Contact Two Slot • Clause 10 – Mixed Power Connector Module • 28 each 10A Contact • 16 each 20A Contact • Clause 11 –Universal 24 each Size 8 Contacts • 40GHz Coax • 45Amp Contacts • Pneumatic Contacts • Fiber Optic Contacts • Clause 12 – High-Speed Signal • 300 Contact Single Slot

  8. IEEE-Std-1505 RFIExample Connector Modules Signal Power (Single Slot) Mixed Power Multi-slot Coax

  9. IEEE-Std-1505 RFI • Status • Standard Released/Published April 2007 • May Be Purchased From IEEE Xplore http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/standards.jsp • User Base Already Includes Demonstration and Deployed Systems IEEE-Std-1505 Compliant Interfaces DRS Large Depot Applic - SCATE DRS Benchtop Subset ATE

  10. Additional 1505 RFI - System Applications DRS DCCT BSTF V6 (NGATS)

  11. IEEE-P1505.1 CTI Information Shown Subject to Change Until Standard is Balloted

  12. IEEE-P1505.1 CTI • Need • Transportability/Rehost Capability of Test Program Sets • Requires a Standard Pin Map of Signals/Capability • Specific Implementation of: • Connector Modules Types per Slot • Segmentation • Scalability • Physical Mating Compatibility • Keying

  13. IEEE-P1505.1 CTI - Overview • Transportability of TPSs Between ATE Systems • “New” ATE That are Legacy Upgrades • Desires for New ATE to be Able to Test Legacy Weapons Systems PLUS the New Systems • Factory to Field Test Compatibility • Required Study of Existing “Legacy” ATE Systems • CASS • TETS • IFTE • Etc., Etc., Etc. • Total of 3860 Signals are Mapped in Latest Version

  14. CTI Segmentation/Scalability

  15. P1505.1 CTI Functional Type Map

  16. P1505.1 CTI Pin Map Overview

  17. P1505.1 CTI Connector Blocks • CTI Does not Utilize all the Connector Types Defined in the IEEE-Std-1505 RFI Standard • Signal pins for 3 Amp service up to 750 MHz • Coax Pins for 3 or 5 GHz performance (In either 59 single-wide and 152 Pin, double-wide Module Blocks) • Power Pins 23 Amp service or Pins (In either 59 single-wide or 152 Pin, double-wide Module Blocks)

  18. P1505.1 Levels of Compliance • Standard Allows Levels of Compliance • Mechanical – Each Slot has a Compliant (Correct) Connector Module • Full – For Populated Slots, Signals Match the Pin Map • Categories are Defined for Scalability and Compliance • Category 1 = Slots 6 thru 9 • Category 2 = Slots 1 thru 9 • Category 3 = Slots 6 thru 24 • Category 4 = Slots 1 thru 24 • Category 5 = Slots 1 thru 29 (All/Full Compliance)

  19. P1505.1 Compliant Keying • Categories That are Fully Compliant MUST Implement the Keying Shown Below • Non-Compliant Systems MUST Implement a DIFFERENT Keying

  20. P1505.1 Status • Some Systems Have Implemented Draft Standard • Very Near Initiating Ballot • Latest Information From SCC-20 HIWG Meeting Held 9/15 & 9/16 is: . . . . .

  21. IEEE-P1505.2 Two-Tier CTI

  22. IEEE-P1505.2 Two-Tier Interface • Not all Identified Requirements Included in P1505.1 • Multi-Tier Support • B-1B • F-15 • C-17 • IAIS • LMStar • Around 1000 Unassigned Pins From 1505.1 Effort • More Research Known to be Required Two Tier Electro-Mechanical RFI

  23. Two-Tier P1505.2 Demonstrates Vertical as Well as Horizontal Scalability Horizontal Scalability Vertical Scalability

  24. Summary • Hardware Interfaces Working Group Is Creating A Series Of Standards To Provide The Following Benefits • Standards-based, Open-architecture Interface Providing Multi-vendor Availability For Lowest-cost To The User • Improved TPS Rehost/Transportability Though A Defined Pin-map And Segmentation Scheme • Scalability For A Range Of ATE/ATS Capability And Sizes • Standards Group is Continuing Effort to Provide Benefits to the System Integrator and the User • Everyone is Invited to Join the Group by Attending Meetings and Completing a “Bluesheet” at: http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/scc20/bluesheet.html • Learn More at the SCC-20 Web Site: http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/scc20/

More Related