1 / 1

Analysis Run 4 Au+Au Centrality 20-60% Divide data into twelve 15 o slices

Is the ridge formed by aligned jet propagation and medium flow direction? Joshua Konzer (Purdue University) (For STAR Collaboration). Motivation Dihadron correlation relative to reaction plane (RP) is sensitive to medium effects due to variable path length

osma
Télécharger la présentation

Analysis Run 4 Au+Au Centrality 20-60% Divide data into twelve 15 o slices

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Is the ridge formed by aligned jet propagation and medium flow direction? Joshua Konzer(Purdue University) (For STAR Collaboration) • Motivation • Dihadron correlation relative to reaction plane (RP) is sensitive to medium effects due to variable path length • Previous studies show medium effects on both near- and away-side correlations. • Near-side ridge decreases as trigger particle ranges from in- to out-of-plane. • Motivated by above results, Hwa et.al. conjectured that alignment of jet propagation and medium flow–Correlated Emission Model (CEM)–may be the source of the ridge. • CEM predicts an asymmetry in azimuthal correlation dependent on φs • This work is to test • the CEM prediction. • Analysis • Run 4 Au+Au • Centrality 20-60% • Divide data into • twelve 15o slices • dependent on φs(φtrig - φEP) • ranging from -90o to 90o • Trigger particles: 3-4GeV • Associate particles: 1-1.5GeV Jet-Ridge Separation Ridge: correlation at ∆η>0.7. Jet: (∆η<0.7) – Acceptance*(∆η>0.7) |∆η|<0.7 (black) |∆η|>0.7 (color) Ridge φs = 15 to 30 φs = -15 to -30 STAR Preliminary Npairs/Ntrigger Npairs/Ntrigger Jet STAR Preliminary ∆φ (radians) • v2 Background Subtraction • v2{4}: Excludes most non-flow (anything involving fewer than 4 particles Further reduced by flow fluctuations Our minimum for all pT regions • v2{2}: Includes most non-flow (near-side jet, etc.) Commonly used as a maximum correction • v2{RP}: Similar to v2{2} Our maximum for trigger pT regions • Presented improvement • v2{2D away-side} • Use away side to calculate v2{2} • Removes near-side correlation effect • v2 modulation symmetric about p/2 in 2-particle correlation • Our maximum for associate pT regions v2 Background • J.Konzer and F.Wang, arXiv:0810.3282 ∆φ (radians) |∆η|>0.7 Away-Side 2 Gauss Fit (same σ) s 1/Ntrigger dN/d(∆φ) STAR Preliminary ∆φ (radians) φs 0 to 15 φs 15 to 30 φs 30 to 45 φs 45 to 60 φs 60 to 75 φs 75 to 90 STAR Preliminary Trigger Ridge 1/Ntrigger dN/d(∆φ) Jet STAR Preliminary ∆φ (radians) Conclusions Asymmetry • Dihadron correlations with RP are analyzed, separately for each side of RP. • Ridge and jet are separated by Dh cut. • Away-side is asymmetric. • Ridge is asymmetric! • Asymmetry consistent with CEM. • Asymmetry may indicate ridge is from jet and medium flow alignment. Hwa prediction Raw Signal φs0 to 15; 0 to -15 φs30 to 45;-30 to -45 φs60 to 75;-60 to -75 A Npairs/Ntrigger STAR Preliminary Ridge Jet φs 15 to 30;-15 to -30 φs45 to 60;-45 to -60 φs75 to 90;-75 to -90 STAR Preliminary

More Related