1 / 10

ROAD SAFETY PEER REVIEW

ROAD SAFETY PEER REVIEW. Stuart Dungworth I.Eng FIHE MCIHT Reg RSA (IHE) URS/Scott Wilson. OBJECTIVES OF PEER REVIEW Provide an Independent Assessment of the INDII – DGH Road Safety Activities.

otto
Télécharger la présentation

ROAD SAFETY PEER REVIEW

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ROAD SAFETY PEER REVIEW Stuart Dungworth I.Eng FIHE MCIHT Reg RSA (IHE) URS/Scott Wilson

  2. OBJECTIVES OF PEER REVIEW • Provide an Independent Assessment of the INDII – DGH Road Safety Activities. • Review the Consultants’ Recommendations for the Future Programme of Technical Assistance Support of the Development of Road Safety in DGH. • Recommend Appropriate Amendments or Additions for the future Programme or its Activities.

  3. TASKS: • Review Background Documents. • Carry out Interviews of Consultants and DGH Staff. • Comment on the Effectiveness and Impact of the Work Carried out in Activities 014, 194 and 195. • Identify Strengths and Weaknesses of the Road Safety Programme and Lessons Learnt. • Review the Current Activities Involving Other Agencies. • Provide Input into the Future Direction of the INDII Support of the Road Safety Programme in Indonesia

  4. Progress to-date: • RSEU set up with a core team of 5 staff supported by 3 consultants. • Workshops held to increase awareness of road safety activities. • RSAs and Crash Reduction Reports prepared and supported by RSEU staff. • Road Safety Manuals prepared to illustrate road safety engineering, road safety at roadworks and roadside hazard management.

  5. Establishment of Road Safety Unit. • Core team has not yet reached critical mass. • Requires further support. • Message slowly filtering through DGH and Regions. • Insufficient data to support firm accident reduction plan. • Action strategy to be developed to give direction to remaining stages of development. • Allocate budget in accordance with strategy. • Increase cross agency co-operation.

  6. Road Safety Audits and Crash Reduction Programme. • Provide sufficient funding to implement the recommendations of RSAs carried out under Activity 194. • Follow through with pre-opening audits at completion of the works. • Provide sufficient funding to implement recommendations within the crash reduction reports. • Increase programme to cover all regions (at least one in each region).

  7. Road Safety Manuals • Manuals can be used as guidelines for future designs. • Risk of them being too detailed and not easy to use. • Manuals need to be adopted at the highest level. • Series needs expanding to include topics such as Road Safety Audits, Traffic Calming and Speed Management.

  8. Other initiatives IRSMS • Ensure that requirements for road safety engineers is collected at the time of the crash. Input is required by DGH.

  9. Future Initiatives ? • Concentrates on other agencies. • Includes vulnerable users needs (i.e. school zones). • Produce new Traffic Signs and Line Marking Manual • Education programmes. • Crash analysis for South Kalimantan corridor. • Demonstration projects.

  10. Thank you

More Related