680 likes | 806 Vues
This report by the Public Affairs Research Council of Alabama, dated January 17, 2008, evaluates the performance of Alabama's 12 largest school systems with 10,000 or more students, located in five metropolitan areas including Birmingham, Mobile, Montgomery, Huntsville, and Tuscaloosa. It examines how effectively these systems allocate spending to achieve educational results and discusses success metrics measured by the Alabama Reading and Math Test (ARMT) for grades 3-8. The analysis also considers performance discrepancies among various socioeconomic groups, including poverty status and racial demographics.
E N D
Performance Comparisons for Alabama’s Largest School Systems Public Affairs Research Council of Alabama January 17, 2008
The 12 Largest School Systems in Alabama. 10,000 students or more Urban and suburban in character Located in 5 metropolitan areas Birmingham (4) Mobile (2) Montgomery (2) Huntsville (2) Tuscaloosa (2)
Does the system focus spending to produce results? Public Affairs Research Council of Alabama
How we define spending. We include all “core” academic expenditures: Instruction-related: Instruction – teachers, classroom supplies, etc. Instructional Support – principal’s office, library, instructional technology, counselor, nurse, etc. Facilities and Administration: Facility Operation & Maintenance – custodial & maintenance services, utilities, security, etc. Administration – board, central office, etc. We exclude Food Service and Transportation
Does the system succeed with all kinds of students? Public Affairs Research Council of Alabama
How we measure success. Performance on the Alabama Reading and Math Test (ARMT) in Grades 3-8 Measured by % of students performing at Level IV Level I – does not meet grade-level academic standards Level II – partially meets grade-level academic standards Level III – meets grade-level academic standards Level IV – exceeds grade-level academic standards Compared with the statewide average For key socioeconomic subgroups in the student body Poverty vs. Non-Poverty students (defined by free/reduced lunch percentage) White vs. Black students