1 / 23

How Does Research Affect Economic Growth? Dr. Stefan Kooths

mice.uni-muenster.de. How Does Research Affect Economic Growth? Dr. Stefan Kooths Humboldt Institution on Transatlantic Issues Workshop, 25 Mai 2004, Humboldt Universität Berlin Potenzialausschöpfung im Forschungssystem ein Vergleich zwischen Deutschland und den USA. Outline.

paniz
Télécharger la présentation

How Does Research Affect Economic Growth? Dr. Stefan Kooths

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. mice.uni-muenster.de How Does Research Affect Economic Growth? Dr. Stefan Kooths Humboldt Institution on Transatlantic Issues Workshop, 25 Mai 2004, Humboldt Universität Berlin Potenzialausschöpfung im Forschungssystem ein Vergleich zwischen Deutschland und den USA

  2. Outline • Economic Growth:Concepts, Stylized Facts and Theories • Technological Progresswithin the Neoclassical Growth Model • Human Capital • Learning-By-Doing • Learning-By-Schooling • Research and Development • Discussion/Summary Economic Growth Neoclassical Growth Model Human Capital Research and Development Discussion/Summary

  3. change in capacity utilization Cyclical Growth intensive growth per capita production  increasing (labor) productivity Economic Growth Neoclassical Growth Model Human Capital Research and Development Discussion/Summary time

  4. Increase in Productive Capacity per capita production Economic Growth Neoclassical Growth Model Human Capital Research and Development Discussion/Summary trend path time

  5. Equilibrium Growth (Golden Age) per capitaproduction steady-state(constant growth rates of production, capital, knowledge, wage-rate) Economic Growth Neoclassical Growth Model Human Capital Research and Development Discussion/Summary half-life period to adjust to new steady-state path:approx. 20 years time

  6. Evolutionary Growth per capitaproduction Economic Growth Neoclassical Growth Model Human Capital Research and Development Discussion/Summary Kondratieff-cycle? time

  7. institutional framework averagelong-term growth Evolutionary Growth per capitaproduction Economic Growth Neoclassical Growth Model Human Capital Research and Development Discussion/Summary assumption:no hardcore limits to growthdue to scarce (natural) resources (sustainable development debate) time

  8. Stylized Facts • industrialized countries • persistent increase in labor productivity (: 2% p. a.) • constant capital-output ratio • no general convergence, but (regional) clusters • growth engine:R&D combined with imperfect competition (but: no clear correlation between R&D expenditures and growth rate) • learning curve:more important to developing countries than to industrialized countries • microeconomic view: innovation more important a competition advantage of firms than prices/quantities Economic Growth Neoclassical Growth Model Human Capital Research and Development Discussion/Summary

  9. Theories of Economic Growth (Overview) • Classics  secular stagnation thesis(Smith, Ricardo, Malthus, Marx) • Evolutionary Economics  “Creative Destruction”(Schumpeter) • Postkeynesians  instability problems(Harrod, Domar, Kaldor, Robinson) • Neoclassics  exogenous technological progress, human capital (learning-by-doing, learning-by-schooling)(Solow, Arrow, Uzawa, Shell) • New Growth Theory • Endogenous Growth Theory endogenous technological progress(Barro, Grossman, Helpman, Lucas, Romer, Sala-i-Martin) • Semi-Endogenous Growth Theory endog. techn. progress + human capital accum.(Jones, Arnold) Economic Growth Neoclassical Growth Model Human Capital Research and Development Discussion/Summary

  10. L K Basic Neoclassical Growth Model • exogenous population (labor) growth rate n • saving rate: exogenous or derived via dynamic (= intertemporal) optimization (rate of time preference) gY = n and gy = 0 s∙Y= savings = investment = ∆K Economic Growth Neoclassical Growth Model Human Capital Research and Development Discussion/Summary productionY = f(L,K) consumption ∆L = n∙L

  11. Barriers to Capital Accumulation / Effect of Technological Progress per capitaproduction Economic Growth Neoclassical Growth Model Human Capital Research and Development Discussion/Summary y n∙k s∙y k* capital intensity(k = K/L)

  12. K Effect of Technological Progress • exogenous, disembodied, factor augmenting technological progress (alternative: vintage-models) • technological progress does not consume any resources but is “produced by time” (like manna from heaven) gY = n +gA and gy = gA s∙Y=savings = investiment = ∆K Economic Growth Neoclassical Growth Model Human Capital Research and Development Discussion/Summary productionY = A∙f(L,K) technologicalProgress (gA) consumption L ∆L = n∙L

  13. Neoclassical Growth: Main Results • reason for endogenous long-term stagnation: diminishing returns of the reproducible factor (capital stock) • steady-state growth rate independent from savings/investment • per capita growth rate = technological progress growth rate • worldwide diffusion of knowledge guarantees perfect global convergence of steady state growth rates • conditional convergence • poor countries catch up (higher transitional growth) • per capita income depends on saving rate (+), population growth rate (-) and technological progress (+) Economic Growth Neoclassical Growth Model Human Capital Research and Development Discussion/Summary

  14. K A=K Human Capital: Learning-by-Doing / AK Model Learning-by-doing∆A = ∆K • labor augmenting technological progress with capital stock as a proxy for accumulated experience (know-how) • growth engine: production becomes proportional to capital stock (no more diminishing returns to scale!) • steady-state growth rate influenced by: saving rate (rate of time preference), country size, technology • know-how as a public good (externality) inefficient steady-state growth rate suggests public subsidies for investments s∙Y=savings = investment = ∆K Economic Growth Neoclassical Growth Model Human Capital Research and Development Discussion/Summary productionY = f(K∙L,K) consumption L ∆L = n∙L

  15. K Human Capital Accumulation (Learning-by-Schooling/Learning-or-Doing) • labor-embodied know-how (infinitive time horizon or depreciation) • growth engine: no diminishing returns to scale in human capital formation (∆H ~ H) • steady-state growth rate influenced by: saving rate, productivity of the education sector • efficient steady-state growth rate (optimal allocation of resources via market processes) s∙Y=savings = investment = ∆K Economic Growth Neoclassical Growth Model Human Capital Research and Development Discussion/Summary productionY = f(u∙H,K) consumption u∙H H ∆H ~ (1-u)∙H

  16. Producing Technological Progress via Research & Development • reasearch done by rational, profit-maximizing agents • (old) idea: growth is sustained by increased specialization of labor • incentives to innovate (monopoly profits) stem from imperfect competition in the intermediate sector (patent protection) • growth engine: spillovers and specialized capital • steady-state growth rate influenced by: • productivity in the R&D-sector • stock of human capital • saving rate • productivity in the final goods sector (negative!) • inefficient steady-state growth rate (too low) due to spillover-externalities Economic Growth Neoclassical Growth Model Human Capital Research and Development Discussion/Summary

  17. A ∑Ki ∑xi H Producing Technological Progress via Research & Development (Cont.) s∙Y=savings = investment = ∆K Economic Growth Neoclassical Growth Model Human Capital Research and Development Discussion/Summary intermediate production x1 = f(K1) ... final productionY = f(u∙H,∑xi) xi = f(Ki) consumption ... xn = f(Kn) ∆A spillover R&D-production∆A ~ (1-u)∙H∙A (1-u)∙H u∙H

  18. Further Aspects of R&D-driven Endogenous Growth • international effects • no growth effects from trade • knowledge diffusion (R&D-spillovers) increases growth rate • North-South-models: imitation in the South enhances growth in the innovating North (if no frictions in structural change) • negative growth effect of learning-by-doing • basic research is not invariably good (hump shape effect due to opportunity costs in the R&D-sector) • case of decreasing returns to scale in R&D • negative externalities in R&D (rent-seeking) • research activity might be too high Economic Growth Neoclassical Growth Model Human Capital Research and Development Discussion/Summary

  19. Neo-Schumpeterian Approach to Endogenous Growth • vertical model of product development (allows for obsolescence of old intermediate inputs  creative destruction) • R&D production involves labor and capital • explains increasing R&D-expenditures with constant growth rates • unbalanced growth paths (driven by expectations on future research), possible no-growth trap • excessive research possible due to business-stealing effect • equilibrium growth rate can be greater or less than social optimum Economic Growth Neoclassical Growth Model Human Capital Research and Development Discussion/Summary

  20. Semi-Endogenous Growth • combination of R&D and human capital accumulation • decreasing returns to scale in R&D (otherwise exploding growth) • growth rate still endogenous, but exogenous to political influence • R&D-subsidies • taxes • basic research • economic integration(for innovators) • policy advice: concentrate more on the level than on the growth effects Economic Growth Neoclassical Growth Model Human Capital Research and Development Discussion/Summary no effect on steady-state growth rate

  21. Discussion • no clear picture (lack of robust results due to complex interaction of various influence factors) • lack of institutions and transaction costs ( NIE) • no qualitative supply-side restrictions • problem of exhaustible resources resolved by knowledge (factor augmenting technological change) • knife-edge problem (saddle path “stability”, linear-homogenous production functions): path between stagnation and exploding growth • endogenous growth theory: rather conditions for steady-state than explaining the future Economic Growth Neoclassical Growth Model Human Capital Research and Development Discussion/Summary

  22. Summary • long-run analysis (steady-state): distinguishes between rate effects that last and those that are transient • capital accumulation alone does not provide for persistent productivity growth • learning-by-doing: not plausible enough for permanent growth • basic research: input for R&D, not for final good productions, hump-shape-effect • human capital accumulation: does not allow for technological progress • R&D-models suggest room for political interventions • the R&D-picture changes in the world of semi-endogenous growth • omitted here: evolutionary theories (institutional framework for the invention-innovation-diffusion process) Economic Growth Neoclassical Growth Model Human Capital Research and Development Discussion/Summary

  23. Literature • Aghion, P. / Howitt, P.: Endogenous Growth Theory, MIT Press, Cambridge (MA) 1998. • Arnold, L.: Wachstumstheorie; Vahlen-Verlag, München 1997. • Barro, R. J. / Sala-i-Martin, X.: Economic Growth; 2nd Ed., McGraw Hill, New York et al. 2003. • Grossman, G. M. / Helpman, E.: Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy; Reprint Edition, MIT Press, Cambridge (MA) 1993. • Frenkel, M. / Hemmer, H.-R.: Grundlagen der Wachstumstheorie; Vahlen-Verlag, München 1999. Economic Growth Neoclassical Growth Model Human Capital Research and Development Discussion/Summary

More Related