1 / 37

MORPHOLOGICAL CLUSTER CLASSIFICATION AND STAR FORMATION

MORPHOLOGICAL CLUSTER CLASSIFICATION AND STAR FORMATION. Florent Rostagni. OUTLINE. Context Sample Algorithm for detection and classification Star formation X-ray – optical study Perspectives - Conclusion. STANDARD MODEL OBSERVATIONS. D r / r ~ 200. D T/T ~10 -5.

paniz
Télécharger la présentation

MORPHOLOGICAL CLUSTER CLASSIFICATION AND STAR FORMATION

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MORPHOLOGICAL CLUSTER CLASSIFICATION AND STAR FORMATION Florent Rostagni

  2. OUTLINE Context Sample Algorithm for detection and classification Star formation X-ray – opticalstudy Perspectives - Conclusion

  3. STANDARD MODELOBSERVATIONS Dr/r~ 200 DT/T ~10-5 Galaxy distribution CosmicMicrowave Background t Present Big-Bang ~380 000 years GRAVITATION

  4. STANDARD MODELSIMULATIONS > 100 galaxies 1013 M. £ M £ 1015 M. ~ 1 Mpc STRUCTURES: FILAMENTS CLUSTERS

  5. STANDARD MODEL structure formation rate cosmological parameters dynamical state of clusters

  6. STANDARD MODELSTRUCTURE GROWTH 1.5 1 0.5 1.5 1 0.5 z z Cohn & White 2005

  7. ² Cohn et al. 2001

  8. GALAXY CLUSTERS GALAXIES GAS DARK MATTER 1930 optical 5% of the mass 1980 X-ray 15% of the mass 1980 gravitationnallens 80% of the mass

  9. GALAXY CLUSTERS REGULAR CLUSTER IRREGULAR CLUSTER

  10. GALAXY CLUSTERSidealrelaxed cluster Projectedgalaxydisribution King profile 1 Mpc Galaxyorbits gaussianvelocity distribution

  11. MORPHOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION OPTICAL X-RAY Galaxy contents Wavelets Adaptive kernel Centroid shift Power ratio elliptcity • projection effects • point distribution • + whole cluster + no projection effect + continuousfield - cluster core SKY PLANE

  12. SAMPLE Redshift information along the line of sight SDSS 25% of the sky spec. complete up to r=17.5 best surveyatlowzavailable C4 clusters: detectedusing 4 colors

  13. SAMPLEC4 Search for concentration of galaxies in a 4 color space Galaxywith 6-th nearest distance neighbour = C4 cluster center All galaxies withinr15 are assigned to the cluster

  14. SAMPLEC4 • Results: • 90% complete • 95% pur • 98% of X-Ray clusters • 90% of Abell clusters

  15. SAMPLEC4 • Centering: • Definition of the cluster center (6-th nearestneighbour in color space) • Piling up of structures along the line of sight: • Due to only use of colors • Loss of some C4 clusters • Split of C4 clusters in severalunits

  16. SDSS SAMPLE • Whatwe have: • 218 catalogs (fields) of galaxies around 10Mpc of C4 clusters withenoughmeasuredspectra • Whatwe use: • Position • Photometric magnitude in r-band • Spectroscopic (60%) and photometricredshift

  17. CLASSIFICATION Search for galaxy concentrations in phase space 6 coordinates of galaxies (a,d,z) onlyavailable 3D (a,d,z) ? 1D (z) + 2D (a,d) Construction of distribution functionsbased on wavelets + measure of deviations to relaxedones

  18. CLASSIFICATIONalong the line of sight Fields z f(z) wavelets

  19. CLASSIFICATIONalong the line of sight Ngal>50 Fields z f(z) Packets wavelets EMMIX Peaks

  20. CLASSIFICATIONextractingpeakswith EMMIX c2

  21. CLASSIFICATIONalong the line of sight Ngal>50 Fields z f(z) Packets wavelets EMMIX Peaks

  22. CLASSIFICATIONalong the line of sight 156 peaks

  23. CLASSIFICATIONalong the line of sight List of peaks 2 cases distant peaks close peaks POTENTIALLY RELAXED INTERACTION

  24. CLASSIFICATIONassignment of galaxies

  25. CLASSIFICATIONin sky plane Isolated or interactingpeak (a,d) Densitymaps ( 2-10Mpc) Cluster catalog wavelets SExtractor Ngal>Ngalmax / 10 Sub-stucturecatalog 3Mpc densitymaps (0.5-3Mpc) Cluster catalog SExtractor wavelets Ngal>Ngalmax / 10

  26. CLASSIFICATIONin sky plane Sub-stucturecatalog 3 cases weightcriteria: 1:10 1 clump one main clump severalheavyclumps POTENTIALLY RELAXED INTERACTION

  27. CLASSIFICATION POTENTIALLY RELAXED INTERACTION PEAKS CLUMPS POTENTIALLY RELAXED RELAXED INTERACTION INTERACTION INTERACTION INTERACTION

  28. CLASSIFICATIONresults Isolated clusters rate ~ 13% • 218 C4 fields • 110 packets • 156 peaks • 98 isolatedpeaks • 216 clusters • 29 isolated clusters

  29. CLASSIFICATIONon goingwork • Classification: • relaxed • interacting • Improvements: • introduceellipticity in classification • interacting: elaboratesub-categorieswith bimodal ....

  30. X-RAY – OPTICALCOMPARISON Different dynamical time Different morphologies Dynamical state + Fusion stage Collaboration with H. Bourdin Data for 18 C4 clusters with XMM Galaxy: collisionless Gas: collisional

  31. X-RAY – OPTICALCOMPARISON Optical X-Ray

  32. X-RAY – OPTICALCOMPARISON • Temperaturemaps • dynamical state, cold core

  33. STAR FORMATION • Whatis the influence of cluster dynamical state on star formation rate of their host galaxies? • Does cluster merging speed up star formation in galaxies or in contrarydoesit stop star formation? • Is it the case for all galaxies? • If not, where are star forming galaxies and/or star formation stopping galaxies?

  34. STAR FORMATION • Galaxy type determined by spectra: • Unclassified or not used • Star forming • Composite • AGN • Low S/N liner • Fraction of SF galaxies in clumps

  35. CONCLUSION Classification of galaxy clusters ~13 % isolated clusters

  36. PERSPECTIVES Evolution of fusion rate with time • Use of zphot: • Impact of its use on classification, control of errors • Application of classification to CFHT-LS data: • more galaxies • deeper

  37. THANK YOU

More Related