1 / 6

Evidence Against The Big Bang Theory

Evidence Against The Big Bang Theory. Ms Desirae. Creationism. Creationism- the belief that the universe and living organisms were created from specific acts of divine creation, rather than by undirected processes such as evolution. Evidence #1.

parson
Télécharger la présentation

Evidence Against The Big Bang Theory

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Evidence Against The Big Bang Theory MsDesirae

  2. Creationism • Creationism- the belief that the universe and living organisms were created from specific acts of divine creation, rather than by undirected processes such as evolution.

  3. Evidence #1 • The First Law of Thermodynamics states that the total quantity of matter and energy in the universe is constant. The Second Law of Thermodynamics states that matter and energy always tend to change from complex and ordered states to disordered states. • This implies that the universe could not have existed forever or it would have already run down • Also implies that the universe could have not created itself

  4. Evidence #2 • Life appears abruptly and in complex forms in the fossil record, and gaps appear systematically in the fossil record between various living kinds. (Cambrian Explosion) • The Second Law of Thermodynamics states that entropy tends to increase unless added energy is directed by a conversion mechanism. Simple molecules and complex protein, DNA, and RNA molecules could not have evolved spontaneously into a living cell. • The laboratory experiments have not even remotely approached the synthesis of life from nonlife, and the limited results have depended on laboratory conditions that are artificially imposed and extremely improbable.

  5. Evidence #3 • The creation of the Universe, Earth and living kinds may have been relatively recent • Radiometric dating methods depend on three assumptions: • (1) that no decay product (lead or argon) was present initially or that the initial quantities can be accurately estimated • (2) that the decay system was closed through the years (so that radioactive material or product did not move in or out of the rock) • (3) that the decay rate was constant over time. • Each of these assumptions may be questionable • (1) some nonradiogenic lead or argon was perhaps present initially • (2) the radioactive isotope (uranium or potassium isotopes) can perhaps migrate out of, and the decay product (lead or argon) can migrate into, many rocks over the years • (3) the decay rate can perhaps change by neutrino bombardment and other causes.

  6. Source • http://www.icr.org

More Related