SlideServe
Menu
Préférences
© SlideServe · v2026

Quest for Perfection

pascal avatar
15 diapositives · 306 Views · Aug 28, 2014

Quest for Perfection. Florida Comprehensive Assessment Tests and End-of-Course Assessments. FCAT 2.0 Reading Grades 3 – 10 FCAT 2.0 Mathematics Grades 3 – 8 FCAT 2.0 Science Grades 5 & 8 FCAT Writing Grades 4, 8 &10 Algebra 1 & Geometry Biology Under development: U.S. History, Civics.

Quest for Perfection - slide 1
01 / 15Quest for Perfection
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Quest for Perfection
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation
  1. Quest for Perfection

  2. Florida Comprehensive Assessment Tests and End-of-Course Assessments • FCAT 2.0 Reading Grades 3 – 10 • FCAT 2.0 Mathematics Grades 3 – 8 • FCAT 2.0 Science Grades 5 & 8 • FCAT Writing Grades 4, 8 &10 • Algebra 1 & Geometry • Biology • Under development: U.S. History, Civics

  3. Pervasive Quality Assurance • Built into every process from planning and designing, to executing • Process and outcome documentation • Process and outcome audits • Transparency • Continuous refinement and redesign • Discipline and vigilance; trust but verify

  4. Pervasive Quality Assurance • Design and Development • Test Construction • Document Quality • Test Security and Administration • Scoring • Calibration/Equating • Reporting Validity

  5. Design and Development • Test Development Center • Contracted center, staffed by educators • Ensures educator involvement & content quality • Standing and Rotating Committees (e.g., Content Advisory, STEM Experts, College-ready Standards, …) • Annual Report to District Superintendents • District educators who served in past year • District educators who are in database (statewide ~4200) • Request for nominations

  6. Test and Item Content Quality HS Meet statistical criteria? Content Advisory Committees Item Review Committees Items are field tested Review and select field-test items HS Test and Item Specs Yes Appropriate? Standards Assessed Clarifications Item Types Examples Yes Key Educator Involvement HS Handscoring

  7. Test Construction • Annual training conducted for Department and contractor staff • Test Construction Specifications • Revised and enhanced annually • Incorporates checklists • Checklists follow documents during test construction • Relentless focus on item quality, overall coherence of test content, statistical quality • Example: location of reading passages compared to prior location is strictly controlled

  8. Document Quality • Test Development Center • Editors • Accommodations specialist • Editorial and content checklists • Variety of staff take each test • Intense and synchronized process

  9. Test Administration • Annual “Test Administration Debrief” meeting • Review of all products against specifications, including shipment samples • Webinars for preparation and training on CBT • Tests are administered and monitored by certified educators. • Multiple equated core forms of CBT are randomly assigned within classrooms.

  10. Test Security Extensive and enhanced test security requirements • Test Security Statute, s. 1008.24, F.S. • Prohibited Activities Agreement • Seating charts, test group codes • Test materials chain of custody form • Student pledge • Data forensics on all grades and tests • Some student results automatically invalidated but have an appeals process. • Investigations, including Department of Law Enforcement and FDOE Inspector General

  11. Scoring and Data Quality • Specifications and checklists • Extensive planning and dry runs with mock data • Contractor site monitoring by FDOE • Document processing and equating audits • Triangulation with FDOE and multiple contractors • Additional assistance from FSU for data checking

  12. Handscoring Quality Assurance Extensive quality assurance processes are utilized for FCAT Writing handscoring • FDOE and educators review, revise, and approve all training and qualifying materials. • FDOE staff provide on-site monitoring for training, qualifying, and first full week of scoring • One week of “pseudoscoring” • External audit and public reporting

  13. Reporting Results • Statute (s.1008.22(c)14, F.S.) dictates testing and reporting timeframes. • Cross-agency planning team meets weekly for several months prior to reporting. • Hire seasonal data checkers to verify files/paper reports. • Choreographed file transfers (contractor, FDOE, web team, data warehouse), version control, analyses, and briefings

  14. Pervasive Quality Assurance • Built into every process from planning and designing, to executing • Process and outcome documentation • Process and outcome audits • Transparency • Continuous refinement and redesign • Discipline and vigilance; trust but verify

  15. More information Websites: fcat.fldoe.org/default.asp www.floridapathtosuccess.org/ Technical: fcat.fldoe.org/fcatpub5.asp : @EducationFL Florida Department of Education FL Department of Education