1 / 35

Patient Handling and Movement Programs (PHAMP): Building the Business Case

Patient Handling and Movement Programs (PHAMP): Building the Business Case. Arizona Society for Healthcare Risk Management. Merl Miller, CIE; Certified Industrial Ergonomist Ashton Tiffany, LLC. Prepared by :. Healthcare Has Changed…. But… Not Enough. Prepared by :.

pascha
Télécharger la présentation

Patient Handling and Movement Programs (PHAMP): Building the Business Case

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Patient Handling and Movement Programs (PHAMP): Building the Business Case Arizona Society for Healthcare Risk Management Merl Miller, CIE; Certified Industrial Ergonomist Ashton Tiffany, LLC Prepared by :

  2. Healthcare Has Changed… But… Not Enough Prepared by :

  3. Why Do We Need a Business Case? • Dissatisfaction with current state • Shared recognition of the need for, and logic of, SPHM • Need for SPHM as a combination of threats and opportunities ‘Urgency’ to build momentum for acceptance of SPHM Prepared by :

  4. Categories of Value Prepared by :

  5. QualityCare Patient Satisfaction Staff Satisfaction

  6. Reduce Exposure to Hazards Injury rates Injury frequency Lost workdays Restricted workdays Direct cost of injuries Indirect cost Total cost Prepared by :

  7. Personal Protective Equipment Yet, we routinely accept exposureto musculoskeletal hazards. Prepared by :

  8. Incident Cost Iceberg • INJURY & ILLNESS • DIRECT COSTS • Medical • Compensation costs • INDIRECT COSTS • Overtime • Quality • Patient injury • Hiring/Retraining • Short-term disability • Productivity/Efficiency • Underreporting Prepared by :

  9. Closer View of WRMSDs REACTIVE APPROACH Lagging Indicators CRITICAL (Disability) SEVERE (Surgery) SERIOUS (Incident) MAJOR (Pain) MINOR (Discomfort) UNRECOGNIZED (Tasks) PROACTIVE APPROACH Leading Indicators Ergonomic Risk Factors Prepared by :

  10. Replacement Staff vs. Core Staff • What do we know about core staff? • Who is providing bedside care? • How does it impact quality? • Is this effective or efficient? Prepared by :

  11. Magnet® Recognition Program Culture of Safety: EP30. Describe and demonstrate “The structure(s) and process(es) used by the organization to improve workplace safety for nurses based on standards such as the ANA’s Safe Patient Handling and Movement” Ref: ANCC (2008) The Magnet Model Components and Sources of Evidence. ANCC, Silver Spring, MD, p.19. Prepared by :

  12. Improve Patient Quality Patient experience Length of stay Never events Negative patient outcome: falls, skin and respiratory health Prepared by :

  13. Staffing Prepared by :

  14. Patient Outcome Patient Experience Prepared by :

  15. Immobility • Functional decline • Reasons for patient immobility • Consequences of patient immobility • respiratory (pneumonia) • CV (DVT, hypotension) • GI (constipation) • musculoskeletal • skin (pressure ulcers) • psychosocial Prepared by :

  16. Understanding the Value • Reduced patient falls and associated costs • Reduced patient ulcers and treatment costs • Increased patient satisfaction • Reduced costs from WC and lost/ restricted workdays • Improved worker satisfaction • Improved worker retention and reduced turnover Prepared by :

  17. Systems and Processes • Efficiency • number of staff to do task? • time spent waiting for assistance? • Non–value added tasks • Wasted motion and physical effort • Barriers to efficiency Prepared by :

  18. What is Necessary for Change to Occur? Model to follow—implementation process: • outlines the organizational strategy • provides an understandable approach • organizes tools and resources Focus on process! Prepared by :

  19. Barriers to Efficiency Equipment access: Location Distance Compliance Inventory and par levels: Insufficient resources Budget Accountability Logistics and cleaning: Shrinkage Schedule Turnaround time Prepared by :

  20. What are the Program Elements? • Leadership commitment • Employee involvement and participation • Program management and coordination • Worksite analysis • Risk identification, analysis, and control • Education and training • Medical management • Continuous monitoring and improvement Prepared by :

  21. Employee Engagement Develop a facility SPHM team • facility process leader(s) • administrative sponsor • SPHM specialist or coordinator • SPHM team members • SPHM coaches • ergonomics and injury prevention specialist Prepared by :

  22. Why Do You Need a SPHM Specialist? • Strong and committed leadership • Visible, active, and public commitment/ support • Willingness to take initiative and challenge the status quo • High level of attention to/focus on SPHM • Change leadership as full-time activity Prepared by :

  23. Financial Performance Net operating margin Retention Labor costs (float, pool, and travelers) Workers’ compensation premiums: based on frequency and severity Prepared by :

  24. Loss Data Used to Build a Shared Need • Forces any resistance or apathy to be addressed head-on • Indicates why SPHM is critical • Builds momentum to get SPHM program communicated and launched Prepared by :

  25. Gaining Commitment • Identify direct and indirect cost of WRMSDs • Calculate overtime, premium labor and agency staff • Relate to operations and profit margin • Link with patient safety and satisfaction • Consider the dollars of reimbursement needed to offset workers’ compensation claims? Prepared by :

  26. Return on Investment • Productivity • Efficiency • Performance • Injury risk • Probability of injury • Injury consequence Prepared by :

  27. Operating Margin Impact Prepared by :

  28. Indirect Costs 3–10 X Direct Costs

  29. Operating Margin Impact Prepared by :

  30. Operating Margin Impact How many additional surgical cases must be performed to cover these dollars? Prepared by :

  31. Which Option Makes Sense? Prepared by :

  32. External Organizations with Recognition • The Joint Commission Accreditation • ANCC Magnet Recognition Program® • American Nurses Association • American Industrial Hygiene Association • Association of periOperative Registered Nurses • National Association of Orthopaedic Nurses • American Association for Safe Patient Handling and Movement Prepared by :

  33. Regulations • Safe patient handling—federal bill introduced • States with legislation passed or introduced • TX, IL, MN, MD, NJ, RI, WA, NY, HI, MA, MI, MO, VT • Federal OSHA—general duty clause: “every employer must provide a safe working environment for their employees” Prepared by :

  34. If you have questions or would like a copy of this presentation, please contact:Merl Miller, CIE Ashton Tiffany, LLC 333 E. Osborn Road, Suite 300 Phoenix, Arizona 85012602.222.3840merl.miller@ashtontiffany.comhttp://www.ashtontiffany.com Prepared by :

More Related