1 / 15

Can Anesthesia Induction Rooms Improve Operating Room Efficiency?

Can Anesthesia Induction Rooms Improve Operating Room Efficiency? Theodore Ganley, MD Seema Sonnad, PhD Amol Narang, ¼ MD ACL Reconstruction Associated with immediate post-operative pain Post-operative analgesia Intra-articular (IA) administration of medications

paul2
Télécharger la présentation

Can Anesthesia Induction Rooms Improve Operating Room Efficiency?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Can Anesthesia Induction Rooms Improve Operating Room Efficiency? Theodore Ganley, MD Seema Sonnad, PhD Amol Narang, ¼ MD

  2. ACL Reconstruction • Associated with immediate post-operative pain • Post-operative analgesia • Intra-articular (IA) administration of medications • Femoral Sciatic Nerve Block (FSNB)

  3. IA vs. FSNB • FSNB better clinically • Lower post-op opioids • Better post-op analgesia Ganley, Theodore. Intra-articular Bupivacaine-Clonidine-Morphine versus Femoral Sciatic Nerve Block in Pediatric Patients Undergoing ACL Reconstruction. Anesthesiology & Analgesia. 2005;101:1304-10.

  4. p < .001 IA vs. FSNB • Increased anesthesia administration time Ganley, Theodore. Intra-articular Bupivacaine-Clonidine-Morphine versus Femoral Sciatic Nerve Block in Pediatric Patients Undergoing ACL Reconstruction. Anesthesiology & Analgesia. 2005;101:1304-10.

  5. Anesthesia Induction Room • Reduce costly OR time • Increase time spent on other services • Additional cases scheduled • Decreased overtime costs • Intangible benefits

  6. Literature • Dexter et al. (1999) • 80% reduction in non-operative time to schedule additional 45 minute case • Torkii et al. (2005) • 45.6% decrease in non-operative time • Additional case scheduled per 7 hours

  7. Study Design • Retrospective and prospective observational study • Patients undergoing knee arthroscopy • Study duration • Retrospective: 7/2007 – 12/2007 • Prospective: 7/2008 – 12/2008

  8. Study Design • Primary endpoint: mean and standard deviation of non-operative time spent in the OR • Time intervals in the OR process: • AS ↔ AR ↔ PS ↔ SS ↔ ES ↔ POR • AS ↔ AR ↔ AOR ↔ PS ↔ SS ↔ ES ↔ POR Torkii, Paulus. Use of Anesthesia Induction Rooms Can Increase the Number of Urgent Orthopedic Cases Completed within 7 Hours. Anesthesiology. 2005; 103:401-5.

  9. Study Design • Confounding variables • Height, Weight, ASA Physical Status, Block Type, Personnel Type, Time of Year, Time of Day • Learning curve analysis

  10. Early Results • Pre-Induction Room Post-Induction Room N = 111 N = 12

  11. Early Results

  12. Other Goals • Secondary endpoints • OR utilization • Cases performed per unit time • Overtime hours • Scheduled OR times versus actual OR times • Scheduling algorithm

  13. Other Goals • Translating per operation time savings into per day time savings • Translating time savings into cost savings • Cost of OR time • Overtime costs

  14. Thanks! • Mentors: Dr. Sonnad and Dr. Ganley • Joanne Levy • Kelly, Tina, and Lisa • SMUR Scholars

  15. Special thanks to the following organizations for their generous support: • The University of Pennsylvania Provost’s Diversity Fund • The Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion (CHERP) • Pennsylvania Department of HealthOffice of Health Equity

More Related