Download
1 / 45
450 likes | 749 Vues
Introduction. I. Nouvelle vision du FEMII.
E N D
1. Politiques et processus du FEM au cours du FEM-4 Atelier sous-rgional pour les points focaux du FEM
Afrique de lEst et Afrique australe
Nairobi, 14-16 mai 2007
2. Evolving Policies and Processes
Revised focal area strategies
Streamlined project cycle
New Project preparation Docs
Pipeline management
Direct dialogue with countries
Presentation will try to show participants the role the country will be expected to play in setting priority areas, identification of project concepts and implementationEvolving Policies and Processes
Revised focal area strategies
Streamlined project cycle
New Project preparation Docs
Pipeline management
Direct dialogue with countries
Presentation will try to show participants the role the country will be expected to play in setting priority areas, identification of project concepts and implementation
3. I. Nouvelle vision du FEM
Stratgique
Innovateur
quitable
Accessible
Focalis
4. Le FEM sera stratgique Dfinition de priorits claires pour lenvironnement mondial
Recentrage des stratgies concernant les domaines dintervention
Biodiversit
Changements climatiques (attnuation et adaptation)
Eaux internationales
Destruction de lozone
Dgradation des sols
Polluants organiques persistants (POP)
Exploitation de synergies pour les questions multisectorielles
Gestion forestire durable
Gestion rationnelle des produits chimiques
Le Secrtariat du FEM prsentera ses stratgies rvises en vue de leur examen et de leur approbation au Conseil du FEM lors de sa runion de juin 2007 MB spoke of the new vision for the GEF. This need to implement this vision has resulted in a number of changes in policies and processes at the GEF.
Interim focal area strategies have been distributed to Dialogue participants.MB spoke of the new vision for the GEF. This need to implement this vision has resulted in a number of changes in policies and processes at the GEF.
Interim focal area strategies have been distributed to Dialogue participants.
5. Le FEM sera stratgique (suite) Promotion dune approche programme
De prfrence une approche axe sur le projet
laboration et application dindicateurs deffets et dimpacts
6. Le FEM sera innovateur Financement des efforts la pointe du progrs et dinitiatives innovantes visant tablir des technologies durables
Utilisation du capital mondial en faveur du dveloppement durable
Approche du secteur priv au niveau des pays GEF is trying to identify opportunities to support new technologies especially in the climate change area and also ways to enhance the involvement of the private sector in the GEF.
Reference to Private Sector strategy currently under development and Prize capital. Identify number of private sector participants in the meeting.GEF is trying to identify opportunities to support new technologies especially in the climate change area and also ways to enhance the involvement of the private sector in the GEF.
Reference to Private Sector strategy currently under development and Prize capital. Identify number of private sector participants in the meeting.
7. Le FEM sera quitable Cration de mcanismes spciaux par lesquels les pays vulnrables auront plus facilement accs aux ressources du FEM
- Place spciale accorde aux PEID
Mesures assurant quun montant minimum de ressources soit disponible pour tous les pays par lapplication du DAR
8. Le FEM sera accessible Tenue de dialogues directs et transparents avec les pays pour sassurer de la bonne comprhension des nouvelles politiques et procdures
Amlioration de limage institutionnelle et des communications extrieures du FEM
Amlioration du systme de gestion des donnes et du site Internet GEFSEC is having more direct contact with countries through teleconferences and ongoing dialogue.
GEF is working with all agencies to enhance its corporate image and to streamline its public communications.
New management information system and web site will make information on GEF projects and country portfolios more accessible to all. The web site will also be enhanced to make information more accessible.GEFSEC is having more direct contact with countries through teleconferences and ongoing dialogue.
GEF is working with all agencies to enhance its corporate image and to streamline its public communications.
New management information system and web site will make information on GEF projects and country portfolios more accessible to all. The web site will also be enhanced to make information more accessible.
9. Le FEM sera focalis
galisation des conditions dintervention entre les entits dexcution
Veiller ce que toutes les entits aient un accs direct aux ressources du FEM
Collaborer avec les entits compte tenu de leurs avantages comparatifs
Simplification du processus dlaboration des projets du FEM
Rvision du cycle des projets
Rduction et meilleure gestion de la filire
Ciblage des ressources vers les pays offrant le meilleur potentiel dobtention davantages pour lenvironnement mondial et de performance nationale
10. II. volution des politiques et des processus Dispositif dallocation des ressources
Cycle des projets
Stratgies concernant les domaines dintervention
Programme de microfinancements
Avantages comparatifs des entits dexcution du FEM
New policies in place to implement vision evolving process require Council approval for some and others require further researchNew policies in place to implement vision evolving process require Council approval for some and others require further research
11. Dispositif dallocation des ressources Nouveau systme visant allouer les ressources limites du FEM tous les pays qui peuvent y prtendre
Allocations fondes sur :
Les avantages pour lenvironnement mondial
Les performances au niveau du pays
The RAF does not apply to other focal areas. Multi focal area projects with a biodiversity or climate change component will need to be finance the biodiversity/climate change portion out of RAF allocations. Participating countries need to share the financing of regional projects.
Global Environmental Priorities are measured by a Global Benefits Index.
For climate change, two factors determine GBI -- baseline emissions and improvements in carbon intensity over time.
For Biodiversity, the scale, diversity, and threats to species and the diversity of ecosystems are the primary determinants of GBI.
Country Level Performance is measured through an assessment of policies and institutions that lead to an enabling environmental for project success as well as the actual success rates in the implementation of environmental projects.
The RAF does not apply to other focal areas. Multi focal area projects with a biodiversity or climate change component will need to be finance the biodiversity/climate change portion out of RAF allocations. Participating countries need to share the financing of regional projects.
Global Environmental Priorities are measured by a Global Benefits Index.
For climate change, two factors determine GBI -- baseline emissions and improvements in carbon intensity over time.
For Biodiversity, the scale, diversity, and threats to species and the diversity of ecosystems are the primary determinants of GBI.
Country Level Performance is measured through an assessment of policies and institutions that lead to an enabling environmental for project success as well as the actual success rates in the implementation of environmental projects.
12. Dispositif dallocation des ressources (suite) Le DAR assure prvisibilit et transparence aux pays
Il sapplique aux domaines dintervention de la biodiversit et des changements climatiques durant le FEM-4
The RAF does not apply to other focal areas. Multi focal area projects with a biodiversity or climate change component will need to be finance the biodiversity/climate change portion out of RAF allocations. Participating countries need to share the financing of regional projects.
Global Environmental Priorities are measured by a Global Benefits Index.
For climate change, two factors determine GBI -- baseline emissions and improvements in carbon intensity over time.
For Biodiversity, the scale, diversity, and threats to species and the diversity of ecosystems are the primary determinants of GBI.
Country Level Performance is measured through an assessment of policies and institutions that lead to an enabling environmental for project success as well as the actual success rates in the implementation of environmental projects.
The RAF does not apply to other focal areas. Multi focal area projects with a biodiversity or climate change component will need to be finance the biodiversity/climate change portion out of RAF allocations. Participating countries need to share the financing of regional projects.
Global Environmental Priorities are measured by a Global Benefits Index.
For climate change, two factors determine GBI -- baseline emissions and improvements in carbon intensity over time.
For Biodiversity, the scale, diversity, and threats to species and the diversity of ecosystems are the primary determinants of GBI.
Country Level Performance is measured through an assessment of policies and institutions that lead to an enabling environmental for project success as well as the actual success rates in the implementation of environmental projects.
13. Allocations en vertu du DAR Les pays se voient octroyer des allocations individuelles dans les domaines de la biodiversit et des changements climatiques
OU
Ils ont accs aux ressources collectives dans les domaines de la biodiversit et des changements climatiques Changes in policies and institutions are the quickest way to increase allocations. Changes in policies and institutions are the quickest way to increase allocations.
14.
Les allocations initiales couvrent les 4 ans du FEM-4
Seuls 50 % de lallocation peuvent tre utiliss pour des projets approuvs durant les 2 premires annes du FEM-4
Les allocations feront lobjet dajustements au bout de 2 ans, pour tenir compte dventuels changements des performances du pays ou des avantages pour lenvironnement mondial Changes in policies and institutions are the quickest way to increase allocations. Changes in policies and institutions are the quickest way to increase allocations.
15. Allocations collectives Les pays ont accs collectivement lallocation attribue au groupe de pays auquel ils appartiennent
Allocations collectives moyennes pour le FEM-4
Biodiversit : 1,6 million $
Changements climatiques : 1,3 million $
Honduras is in the group for (climate change) under the RAF in GEF4. Countries in the group do not have individual allocations; instead all of the countries in the group can collectively access the resources allocated to the group in the respective focal area.
In biodiversity, 93 countries are in the group with a group allocation of approximately $150 million (exactly $146.8 million). This implies that on average all countries in the group can access $1.6 million.
Similarly, in climate change 115 countries are in the group with a group allocation of approximately $150 million (exactly $148.6 million). This implies that on average all countries in the group can access $1.3 million.
Countries may have access to more than the average amounts, only if some of the other countries in the group do not propose projects that meet the priorities and criteria of the GEF. But in no case can a country exceed the upper limit for countries which is ($3.1 million in climate change / $3.5 million in biodiversity). Clearly, if each country in the group proposed projects right up to these upper limits, we would not have sufficient resources to meet the demand. To be fair to all countries, especially those with weaker capacity while at the same time to provide predictability to countries, we have developed a multi-faced approach to programming the resources for the group.
Given the significant demand on these limited resources, we are limiting the use of these resources to enabling activities and projects in the focal area.[1] Specifically, group allocations cannot be used to channel additional resources to the Small Grants Program or the Cross-cutting Capacity Building Programs. Resources for these programs for countries in the group are available from the core funds of the respective programs. Similarly, resources for climate change adaptation projects are also available from the other windows (SPA, LDCCF, SCCF) and so cannot be funded through the RAF allocations.
Next, projects of up to $1 million in each focal area from a country will be reviewed expeditiously in a national context. Larger projects up to the upper limit or multiple projects accounting for more than $1 million would only be reviewed in a global context against all other projects proposed by all countries in the group and would be limited by the resources available to the group. Given these constraints, it is likely that some of the projects that meet all of the technical criteria for GEF funding may not get funded.
As a result, it is our recommendation that countries begin by proposing a project of up to $1 million in a focal area.
[1] Multifocal area projects could be funded under a cost sharing arrangement across the focal areas covered.Honduras is in the group for (climate change) under the RAF in GEF4. Countries in the group do not have individual allocations; instead all of the countries in the group can collectively access the resources allocated to the group in the respective focal area.
In biodiversity, 93 countries are in the group with a group allocation of approximately $150 million (exactly $146.8 million). This implies that on average all countries in the group can access $1.6 million.
Similarly, in climate change 115 countries are in the group with a group allocation of approximately $150 million (exactly $148.6 million). This implies that on average all countries in the group can access $1.3 million.
Countries may have access to more than the average amounts, only if some of the other countries in the group do not propose projects that meet the priorities and criteria of the GEF. But in no case can a country exceed the upper limit for countries which is ($3.1 million in climate change / $3.5 million in biodiversity). Clearly, if each country in the group proposed projects right up to these upper limits, we would not have sufficient resources to meet the demand. To be fair to all countries, especially those with weaker capacity while at the same time to provide predictability to countries, we have developed a multi-faced approach to programming the resources for the group.
Given the significant demand on these limited resources, we are limiting the use of these resources to enabling activities and projects in the focal area.[1] Specifically, group allocations cannot be used to channel additional resources to the Small Grants Program or the Cross-cutting Capacity Building Programs. Resources for these programs for countries in the group are available from the core funds of the respective programs. Similarly, resources for climate change adaptation projects are also available from the other windows (SPA, LDCCF, SCCF) and so cannot be funded through the RAF allocations.
Next, projects of up to $1 million in each focal area from a country will be reviewed expeditiously in a national context. Larger projects up to the upper limit or multiple projects accounting for more than $1 million would only be reviewed in a global context against all other projects proposed by all countries in the group and would be limited by the resources available to the group. Given these constraints, it is likely that some of the projects that meet all of the technical criteria for GEF funding may not get funded.
As a result, it is our recommendation that countries begin by proposing a project of up to $1 million in a focal area.
16. Allocations collectives(suite) Pour assurer lquit et la prvisibilit pour tous les pays du groupe, les dispositions suivantes sont prvues :
Une proposition de projet plafonne 1 million de dollars sera examine au titre des procdures acclres dans le contexte national
Les propositions supplmentaires seront examines en comparaison avec les projets de tous les pays du groupe
Les ressources collectives du groupe ne peuvent pas tre alloues au Programme de microfinancements ni aux activits multisectorielles de renforcement des capacits Honduras is in the group for (climate change) under the RAF in GEF4. Countries in the group do not have individual allocations; instead all of the countries in the group can collectively access the resources allocated to the group in the respective focal area.
In biodiversity, 93 countries are in the group with a group allocation of approximately $150 million (exactly $146.8 million). This implies that on average all countries in the group can access $1.6 million.
Similarly, in climate change 115 countries are in the group with a group allocation of approximately $150 million (exactly $148.6 million). This implies that on average all countries in the group can access $1.3 million.
Countries may have access to more than the average amounts, only if some of the other countries in the group do not propose projects that meet the priorities and criteria of the GEF. But in no case can a country exceed the upper limit for countries which is ($3.1 million in climate change / $3.5 million in biodiversity). Clearly, if each country in the group proposed projects right up to these upper limits, we would not have sufficient resources to meet the demand. To be fair to all countries, especially those with weaker capacity while at the same time to provide predictability to countries, we have developed a multi-faced approach to programming the resources for the group.
Given the significant demand on these limited resources, we are limiting the use of these resources to enabling activities and projects in the focal area.[1] Specifically, group allocations cannot be used to channel additional resources to the Small Grants Program or the Cross-cutting Capacity Building Programs. Resources for these programs for countries in the group are available from the core funds of the respective programs. Similarly, resources for climate change adaptation projects are also available from the other windows (SPA, LDCCF, SCCF) and so cannot be funded through the RAF allocations.
Next, projects of up to $1 million in each focal area from a country will be reviewed expeditiously in a national context. Larger projects up to the upper limit or multiple projects accounting for more than $1 million would only be reviewed in a global context against all other projects proposed by all countries in the group and would be limited by the resources available to the group. Given these constraints, it is likely that some of the projects that meet all of the technical criteria for GEF funding may not get funded.
As a result, it is our recommendation that countries begin by proposing a project of up to $1 million in a focal area.
[1] Multifocal area projects could be funded under a cost sharing arrangement across the focal areas covered.Honduras is in the group for (climate change) under the RAF in GEF4. Countries in the group do not have individual allocations; instead all of the countries in the group can collectively access the resources allocated to the group in the respective focal area.
In biodiversity, 93 countries are in the group with a group allocation of approximately $150 million (exactly $146.8 million). This implies that on average all countries in the group can access $1.6 million.
Similarly, in climate change 115 countries are in the group with a group allocation of approximately $150 million (exactly $148.6 million). This implies that on average all countries in the group can access $1.3 million.
Countries may have access to more than the average amounts, only if some of the other countries in the group do not propose projects that meet the priorities and criteria of the GEF. But in no case can a country exceed the upper limit for countries which is ($3.1 million in climate change / $3.5 million in biodiversity). Clearly, if each country in the group proposed projects right up to these upper limits, we would not have sufficient resources to meet the demand. To be fair to all countries, especially those with weaker capacity while at the same time to provide predictability to countries, we have developed a multi-faced approach to programming the resources for the group.
Given the significant demand on these limited resources, we are limiting the use of these resources to enabling activities and projects in the focal area.[1] Specifically, group allocations cannot be used to channel additional resources to the Small Grants Program or the Cross-cutting Capacity Building Programs. Resources for these programs for countries in the group are available from the core funds of the respective programs. Similarly, resources for climate change adaptation projects are also available from the other windows (SPA, LDCCF, SCCF) and so cannot be funded through the RAF allocations.
Next, projects of up to $1 million in each focal area from a country will be reviewed expeditiously in a national context. Larger projects up to the upper limit or multiple projects accounting for more than $1 million would only be reviewed in a global context against all other projects proposed by all countries in the group and would be limited by the resources available to the group. Given these constraints, it is likely that some of the projects that meet all of the technical criteria for GEF funding may not get funded.
As a result, it is our recommendation that countries begin by proposing a project of up to $1 million in a focal area.
17. Programmation des ressources dans le cadre du DAR Le Secrtariat du FEM engage un dialogue direct avec les pays
Les pays dcident des priorits et des projets nationaux en vue dobtenir les concours du FEM compte tenu des orientations du FEM
Les pays examinent les ides de projets/projets prioritaires avec les entits dexcution du FEM appropries pour les dvelopper
Les redevances des entits du FEM doivent tre imputes sur lallocation au titre du DAR et incluses dans les montants des subventions figurant dans la lettre dapprobation du pays
Programming expected to focus on projects that can demonstrate global impacts. The last bullet point is the segway to talk about individual projects and the project cycle.
Development of programmatic approaches to enhance impacts of projects
Refer back to strategic vision
Programming expected to focus on projects that can demonstrate global impacts. The last bullet point is the segway to talk about individual projects and the project cycle.
Development of programmatic approaches to enhance impacts of projects
Refer back to strategic vision
18. Gestion de la filire des projets en prparation Objectif du FEM : quilibrer la disponibilit et la demande de ressources de manire prvisible et transparente
Les projets sont inscrits dans la filire compte tenu
De leur conformit la stratgie concernant le domaine dintervention du FEM
De leur priorit nationale, daprs lapprobation du pays
Du ralisme du calendrier de prparation
Des rsultats et des impacts mondiaux escompts qui doivent tre mesurables
19. Gestion de la filire des projets en prparation (suite)
court terme : filire 2007
laboration et approbation des projets prioritaires identifis pour 2007
Projets examiner en vue de leur inscription dans la filire aprs juin 2008
20. Stratgies des domaines dintervention Les stratgies des DI prsentes au Conseil en dcembre 2006 sont considres comme provisoires ou comme des versions de travail
Sur la base des orientations du Conseil, le DG rvisera les stratgies en veillant ce quun processus consultatif ait t tabli :
5 Groupes consultatifs techniques (GTT) un pour chaque domaine dintervention, les POP et lozone tant combins
Un Groupe consultatif de coordination des stratgies (GCC)
But de la rvision des stratgies des DI : les focaliser et harmoniser/ intgrer les approches des diffrents DI
Les stratgies rvises seront prsentes au Conseil en juin 2007 en vue de leur examen et de leur approbation.
21. Stratgies des domaines dintervention (suite) Les stratgies provisoires ont fourni la base de linscription dans la filire pour 2007; les stratgies rvises fourniront la base dans linscription dans la filire pour les annes 2008 2010
Les points focaux peuvent suivre les progrs en cours en consultant le site Internet du Secrtariat du FEM :
http://thegef.org/Operational_Policies/Operational_Strategy/GEFFocalAreaStrategies.html
Les points focaux peuvent sils le souhaitent faire connatre leurs ractions sur les travaux en cours par lentremise du membre du Conseil reprsentant leur groupe de pays
22. Cycle des projets propos Objectifs du nouveau cycle des projets propos :
Meilleure programmation stratgique des ressources du FEM en amont;
Rduction du temps de prparation dune moyenne de 66 mois 22 mois;
Simplification du processus gnral et transparence du processus dcisionnel.
23. Cycle des projets propos Le passage dune phase la suivante soprera par deux points dexamen distincts :
Examen de lide de projet et inscription au programme de travail : emploi - dune fiche didentification de projet (FIP) pour lexamen de lide de projet et son approbation par le DG - dun document de programme de travail dcrivant la cohrence gnrale de la programmation des projets dans la filire et portant tout particulirement sur les questions politiques et stratgiques qui seront prsentes par le DG au Conseil;
Approbation du DG : Soumission des projets entirement prpars au DG pour approbation avant leur approbation par les entits dexcution.
24. Cycle des projets propos Les entits dexcution du FEM interviennent lors de trois grandes phases :
Prparation des projets
Approbation des projets et supervision de leur mise en uvre
Clture et valuation des projets
25. Gestion de la filire du FEM Tous les projets dont la FIP a t approuve sont inscrits dans la filire;
Les propositions de projets inscrits dans la filire font lobjet dun traitement selon des jalons temporels fixs;
Les projets pour lesquels les jalons ne sont pas respects peuvent tre annuls conformment aux politiques approuves par le Conseil.
26. Critres dexamen des projets Critres pour la FIP et linscription au programme de travail :
Admissibilit du pays;
Approbation du point focal oprationnel du FEM;
Conformit aux objectifs stratgiques/programmes du FEM;
Avantage comparatif de lentit du FEM soumettant la FIP;
Adquation du montant de la subvention du FEM au regard des ressources disponibles dans le domaine dintervention, des objectifs stratgiques, du programme stratgique et des allocations au titre du DAR;
Cot estimatif du projet;
Jalons pour le traitement du projet.
27. Critres dexamen des projets Critres pour lapprobation du DG :
Tableau des cots dfinitifs pour les composantes du projet, la gestion du projet, les consultants et le cofinancement;
Dispositions de la politique de suivi-valuation du FEM;
Explication de tout changement relatif aux avantages escompts pour lenvironnement mondial, la cohrence avec la stratgie du DI, au montant de la subvention du FEM et au cofinancement aprs approbation de la FIP;
Rapport sur lavancement de la prparation du projet entreprise grce la subvention de prparation.
28. Approbation requise lors de la soumission de la FIP en vue de son approbation par le DG
Les projets relevant des domaines de la biodiversit et des changements climatiques doivent se conformer aux rgles dapprobation du DAR (toutes les ressources demandes devant tre prleves sur les allocations du pays ou les allocations collectives).
29. Fiche didentification de projet (FIP) La soumission des FIP en vue de leur approbation par le DG se fait sur une base mensuelle.
La FIP contient les informations essentielles sur lide du projet et les estimations optimales sur le cot du projet.
30. Subvention de prparation de projet (SPP) Disponible seulement :
Pour les FIP approuves
Aprs rception de la lettre dapprobation du point focal
Montant fond sur les cots estims de prparation du projet et dduit du cot total du projet
Les SPP sont approuves selon un calendrier ouvert
31. Approbation du pays (par le PFO national) Approbation requise :
Lors de la soumission de la FIP pour approbation par le DG et inscription au programme de travail.
Les FIP pour les projets de biodiversit et de changements climatiques doivent tre conformes aux accords conclus avec le pays lors des dialogues directs avec le Secrtariat du FEM. Funding could be first requested from the GEF through application of Project Preparation Grant (PPG). This is done by the agencies on behalf of the government.
OFP endorsement is required the first time a project requests funding from GEFSEC. First time funding could be at preparation stage, in which case, a PPG will be applied. OFP will need to endorse the project when this PPG is requested.
For some projects, the country may not need PPG to fund its preparation. Rather, they may use their own money or use co-financing money to fund the project preparation activities. In this case, the first time that the project will request GEF funding will be at work program inclusion. If this is the case, OFPs endorsement will be needed when the project is submitted to GEFSEC for work program inclusion.
Second bullet point in slide #23 is not a separate endorsement. If a country endorsed a project under RAF, when the project later applies for a PPG, it does not need a second endorsement as the endorsement that the country provided under RAF will be sufficed as endorsement when requesting funding for project preparation or GEF work program inclusion, unless of course a country explicitly requested for a second endorsement. But this will not be a GEF requirement, but a country requirement. I would therefore revise this slides bullet point #2 to:
Projects in the biodiversity and climate change focal areas should follow the endorsement procedures under RAF.
Funding could be first requested from the GEF through application of Project Preparation Grant (PPG). This is done by the agencies on behalf of the government.
OFP endorsement is required the first time a project requests funding from GEFSEC. First time funding could be at preparation stage, in which case, a PPG will be applied. OFP will need to endorse the project when this PPG is requested.
For some projects, the country may not need PPG to fund its preparation. Rather, they may use their own money or use co-financing money to fund the project preparation activities. In this case, the first time that the project will request GEF funding will be at work program inclusion. If this is the case, OFPs endorsement will be needed when the project is submitted to GEFSEC for work program inclusion.
Second bullet point in slide #23 is not a separate endorsement. If a country endorsed a project under RAF, when the project later applies for a PPG, it does not need a second endorsement as the endorsement that the country provided under RAF will be sufficed as endorsement when requesting funding for project preparation or GEF work program inclusion, unless of course a country explicitly requested for a second endorsement. But this will not be a GEF requirement, but a country requirement. I would therefore revise this slides bullet point #2 to:
Projects in the biodiversity and climate change focal areas should follow the endorsement procedures under RAF.
32. Nouvelles directives pour le PMF Assurer ladquation de la demande de financements et des ressources disponibles auprs du Programme de microfinancements (PMF) du FEM
Nouvelles directives labores par le Comit directeur du PMF
Expansion du PMF 21 autres pays
Politique de reclassement des pays pouvant prtendre aux concours du PMF
Dtermination des montants que les pays peuvent allouer au PMF
Graduation Policy
SGP guidelines
Any country which has benefitted from SGP for over 8 years will be required to present a plan to graduate from GEF funding on completion of the gEF-4 cycle. (Beginning 2007) Graduation Policy
SGP guidelines
Any country which has benefitted from SGP for over 8 years will be required to present a plan to graduate from GEF funding on completion of the gEF-4 cycle. (Beginning 2007)
33. III. Rle des pays Les pays devraient repenser leur approche du FEM
laborer une stratgie du FEM globale et cohrente en consultation avec les principales parties prenantes
Intgrer les priorits du FEM dans les cadres nationaux relatifs lenvironnement et au dveloppement durable
Dterminer les priorits nationales concernant le concours du FEM
34. Rle des pays (suite)
Dialoguer avec le Secrtariat du FEM pour dbattre des ides de projets proposes et de lapproche envisage
Approuver les ides de projet avec un processus de consultation en bonne et due forme
Entreprendre le dveloppement et la mise en uvre des projets en partenariat avec les Agents dexcution appropris
35. IV. Adaptation aux changements climatiques Fonds dappui de ladaptation seuls des fonds limits sont encore disponibles sur les 230 M $ annoncs pour ladaptation)
Caractristiques des fonds
Fonds spcial de priorit stratgique pour ladaptation (SPA)
Fonds pour les pays les moins avancs (CCNUCC)
Fonds spcial pour les changements climatiques (CCNUCC)
Fonds dadaptation en cours de ngociation (Protocole de Kyoto)
36. Caractristiques diffrentes des fonds CAISSE DU FEM
Surcots
Avantages mondiaux
DAR
Cofinancement
NOUVEAUX FONDS
Cots additionnels
chelle mobile (facultatif)
Pas de DAR
Pas davantages mondiaux
Autre approche du cofinancement
37. Application titre pilote dune approche oprationnelle de ladaptation (PSA) Il sera montr comment la planification en vue de ladaptation et lvaluation peuvent avoir des applications pratiques pour formuler des projets qui apporteront de rels avantages.
Sur lallocation de 50 millions $, seuls 18 millions $ restent disponibles pour des projets extrmement comptitifs => aprs valuation de la phase pilote, le programme sera appel voluer
Directives de politique Aide du FEM pour appuyer les activits dadaptation
Directives oprationnelles relatives la Priorit stratgique adaptationaux changements climatiques (PSA)
38. Nouveaux fonds sur les changements climatiques : axs sur le dveloppement
Fonds pour les PMA
Mise en uvre des PANA (besoins urgents et immdiats)
Fonds spcial pour les changements climatiques
a) Premire priorit : adaptation
Domaines : Eau, gestion des terres, agriculture, sant, dveloppement de linfrastructure, cosystmes fragiles, gestion intgre des zones ctires, gestion des risques de catastrophe et prvention
=> Complmentarit des fonds
39. Situation des nouveaux fonds Fonds pour les PMA
Dotation actuelle, annonces incluses : 115 millions $
Le Fonds pour le PMA a appuy llaboration de PANA dans 44 PMA et il appuiera leur mise en uvre
Fonds spcial pour les CC
Dotation actuelle, annonces incluses : 60 millions $
34 millions $ dj programms pour des projets sur le terrain
=> Quelque 90 millions $ mobiliss au cours des 12 derniers mois
40. V. Avantages comparatifs des entits du FEM Agents dexcution (PNUD, PNUE, Banque mondiale)
Rle gnral nonc dans lInstrument du FEM
Organismes dexcution (BAfD, BAsB, BERD, BID, FAO, FIDA et ONUDI)
Ont accs aux ressources du FEM et se sont vu attribuer des rles plus troitement dfinis compte tenu des besoins spcifiques du FEM
41. galisation des conditions dintervention volution vers des conditions dintervention plus galitaires pour les entits dexcution du FEM
Les Organismes dexcution ont accs directement aux financements du FEM compte tenu de leurs avantages comparatifs.
Les avantages comparatifs sont valus par le Secrtariat du FEM, en consultation avec le pays, au cours de lexamen de lide du projet.
42. Critres dorientation Renforcement de la capacit du FEM intervenir dans des domaines nouveaux et mergents et tenir compte des priorits des pays et des exigences des conventions;
Diversification de lexprience o le FEM peut puiser pour formuler des interventions novatrices
Mobilisation de ressources supplmentaires
Accroissement de la capacit du FEM mobiliser des ressources financires et techniques et des cofinancements pour ses projets.
43. valuation des avantages comparatifs Les avantages comparatifs sont valus sur la base
Du rle institutionnel et des fonctions fondamentales telles quelles sont nonces dans
Le mandat officiel;
La dclaration de mission;
Les politiques approuves par lorgane directeur;
De la capacit, de lexpertise et de lexprience effectives de lentit telles quelles ressortent
Du plan dactivits de lentit;
Du portefeuille de projets achevs et en cours;
De la prsence dans le pays
44. Processus Description prliminaire de lavantage comparatif de chaque entit avec apports de lentit elle-mme
Description du rle de chaque entit dexcution du FEM dans chacun des domaines dintervention du Fonds
Remarques des entits pour le 20 avril et document disponible en ligne au 11 mai
45. Merci
