1 / 25

The Durban Strategy, NGOs and Human Rights Gerald Steinberg Conference on Ethical Norms in a Political World: NGOs, Huma

The Durban Strategy, NGOs and Human Rights Gerald Steinberg Conference on Ethical Norms in a Political World: NGOs, Human Rights NGO Monitor www.ngo-monitor.org. www.ngo-monitor.org. THE POLITICAL POWER OF NGOs. Non-Governmental Organizations are powerful political actors.

paul2
Télécharger la présentation

The Durban Strategy, NGOs and Human Rights Gerald Steinberg Conference on Ethical Norms in a Political World: NGOs, Huma

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Durban Strategy, NGOs and Human Rights Gerald Steinberg Conference on Ethical Norms in a Political World: NGOs, Human Rights NGO Monitor www.ngo-monitor.org

  2. www.ngo-monitor.org THE POLITICAL POWER OF NGOs • Non-Governmental Organizations are powerful political actors • NGOs define human rights, “war crimes”, violations of international law, etc. • NGOs are not subject to accountability or “checks and balances” • NGOs have no systematic basis for determining the boundary between legitimate criticism and demonization

  3. www.ngo-monitor.org NGO SUPERPOWERS Annual budgets Human Rights Watch                              $ 56 million  Amnesty International (£23.7 million)  $ 43 million   Christian Aid    (£58.5 million)  $ 90 million Oxfam   $368 million  MSF/ Doctors Without (€366 million) $468 million Borders

  4. www.ngo-monitor.org NGO POWER ON DISPLAY: DURBAN – SEPTEMBER 2001

  5. www.ngo-monitor.org DURBAN CONFERENCE NGO DECLARATION • “We declare Israel as a racist, apartheid state in which Israel’s brand of apartheid as a crime against humanity…” • “…we declare and call for an immediate end to the Israeli systematic perpetration of racist crimes including war crimes, acts of genocide and ethnic cleansing…” • "Call upon the international community to impose a policy of complete and total isolation of Israel as an apartheid state…"

  6. www.ngo-monitor.org NGOs Durban Media Jenin UNHCR UN and Diplomats UNGA and ICJ Boycott and Divestment Academia

  7. www.ngo-monitor.org NGOs and the Jenin “Massacre” Myths April 2002 • Derrick Pounder (Amnesty) on the BBC: “the signs pointed to a massacre” • Roth (HRW) and Kahn (Amnesty) spoke about Israeli “war crimes”, erasing the context of terror; • Christian Aid film Peace under Siege dedicated to Palestinian victims of Jenin

  8. NGOs, ACADEMIC BOYCOTTS AND DIVESTMENT CAMPAIGNS • SABEEL Ecumenical Liberation Theology Center, in cooperation with Jeff Halper (ICAHD) • Mennonite Central Committee (CIDA) • al Mezan (SDC, Sweden, Netherlands Representative Office,…) • Miftah (European governments)

  9. www.ngo-monitor.org RESEARCHING NGO AGENDAS HRW IN THE MIDDLE EAST – 2004 Data based on the number and relative weight of documents produced in 2004, compared to other countries in the Middle East, and excluding Iraq-related documents, of which actually pertained to US policy.

  10. www.ngo-monitor.org CAPITAL RESEARCH CENTER STUDY OF AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL AI has adopted “double standards on human rights…and propaganda against America and Israel.”  http://www.capitalresearch.org/pubs/pubs.asp?ID=511

  11. HRW’s use of “Durban” Rhetoric- 2005. • In HRW Middle East publications, Israel was the only country charged with "collective punishment" and "war crimes". • Israel charged with "grave" and /or "serious" human rights "violations" and/or "abuses" 32 times; Egypt 22 ; all other countries fewer than 10.

  12. www.ngo-monitor.org WHO SETS THE AGENDA? REPORTS ON ISRAEL/PA AND SUDAN SEPTEMBER 2000- 2004

  13. www.ngo-monitor.org QUESTIONS:POLITICS, HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE ROLE OF NGOs • What is the status of NGOs in international diplomacy? What is the basis for their role in the UN? • Where is the line between “legitimate criticism” and demonization rhetoric -- “war crimes”, “violation of international law”, “collective punishment”, “excessive” /”disproportionate” force, etc. • How can NGO officials and funders be held accountable?

  14. www.ngo-monitor.org QUESTIONS: NGOs and Ideology • To what degree do NGO officials use universal norms to pursue their own particular objectives? • To what degree do NGO officials promote post-colonial and post-nationalist ideologies, assigning virtue to “victims”, and guilt to others? • To what degree to NGOs provide informed criticism vs. becoming parties to the conflict?

  15. www.ngo-monitor.org Human Rights NGOs and the Media: Is there a Halo Effect? • Do what degree do journalists examine the credibility of NGO reports and claims? • Are NGO claims credible? What are their research capabilities? • To what degree do their political and ideological biases determine NGO reports and allegations?

  16. www.ngo-monitor.org Who Funds Political NGOs? • NGO participation in Durban was funded by the Ford Foundation, other private funds, European governments, Canada, and others • Despite pledges by Ford, funding for most Durban NGOs continues • EU, Canada, Swiss, Japanese, etc funding for NGO under “Partnership for Peace”, Human Rights and Palestinian civil society

  17. EUPFP "PARTNERSHIP FOR PEACE PROGRAMME" AWARDED IN JULY 2005 - Israeli NGOs -- 3.6 Million Euros

  18. EUPFP "PARTNERSHIP FOR PEACE PROGRAMME" AWARDED IN JULY 2005 - Israeli NGOs -- 3.6 Million Euros: CONTINUED

  19. EIDHR (HUMAN RIGHTS) GRANTS -- AUGUST 2005

  20. www.ngo-monitor.org Examining NGO Credibility • Most global NGOs (Amnesty, HRW) have essentially no independent research capability. • They rely on Palestinian “eyewitness testimony” and journalists who use the same sources.

  21. www.ngo-monitor.org NGO Credibility “…Amnesty International has reported that Israeli soldiers deliberately aim at Palestinian children. When asked to document that they couldn't come up with a single case. “Human Rights Watch has made up storiesthat have had no corroboration whatsoever. …..” “I spoke with Donatella Rovera, who is AI's researcher …and asked her to provide the data …Rovera acknowledged that …the report was based on anecdotal information, …from Palestinian NGOs. “It is impossible …for any outside researcher to replicate AI's study and to confirm or disconfirm its conclusions. - Prof. Alan Dershowitz

  22. www.ngo-monitor.org HRW’s Credibility In Gaza • On June 13, HRW’s Mark Garlasco held a press conference in Gaza – claimed evidence pointing to Israeli responsibility for the Friday beach incident • Garlasco was also the author of HRW’s “Razing Rafah” report (11/2004), which was highly political and contained numerous inaccuracies. • How does the press verify Garlasco’s allegations?

  23. www.ngo-monitor.org NGO Anti-Semitism

  24. www.ngo-monitor.org Addressing NGO Political Agendas • Code of Conduct/Ethics for NGOs. • Application of a single universal human rights standard equally to all countries, including Israel • Accountability • Transparency • Education

  25. www.ngo-monitor.org Watching The Watchers: NGO MONITOR

More Related