1 / 17

Overview

Economic regulation of the Victorian water industry Essential Services Commission Workshop Performance reporting framework 7 June 2004. Overview. Process to date Role of performance monitoring Guiding principles Working Group process Draft performance indicators Summary of key issues

pavel
Télécharger la présentation

Overview

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Economic regulation of the Victorian water industryEssential Services Commission WorkshopPerformance reporting framework7 June 2004

  2. Overview • Process to date • Role of performance monitoring • Guiding principles • Working Group process • Draft performance indicators • Summary of key issues • Reporting and auditing • Next steps

  3. Consultation process to date • February 2004 – Consultation Paper No.1 • March 2004 – Public Workshop • April to May –Working Group • May 2004 – Consultation Paper No. 2 • June 2004 – Public Workshop

  4. Role of performance monitoring • Inform customers • Make comparisons between businesses • Identify baseline performance and measure improvement over time • Inform regulatory standards (or targets) and assess compliance with such standards • Inform the decision making processes of regulatory agencies, water businesses and government

  5. Guiding Principles • Performance indicators need to be • Relevant • Meaningful, relate to key issues for both businesses and customers • Defined and collected on a consistent basis • Considered in light of costs associated with collecting information and data • Verifiable • Consistent with other indicators where possible

  6. Working Group Process • Working Group representatives included • Melbourne Water, metropolitan water retailers, regional water businesses • Government agencies and departments (EPA, DHS, DSE) • Customer groups (CUAC, St Vincent de Paul) • Working Group • Met five times • Cooperative • Generally, high level of agreement

  7. Indicator coverage • Baseline explanatory data • Water and sewerage network reliability and efficiency • Customer responsiveness and service • Affordability • Environmental and conservation initiatives (eg, reuse and recycling) • Water quality

  8. Baseline explanatory data • Customer numbers • System length • Water delivered and sewage treated • Population • Number of water and sewage treatment plants

  9. Network reliability and efficiency • Frequency, duration, responsiveness to, and rectification of water supply interruptions • Levels of leakage and losses from water supply systems • adoption of IWA leakage index • Sewer blockages and spills, time to contain spills • Greater emphasis on disaggregation of customers experiencing multiple interruptions/blockages • businesses providing this information to WSAA and VicWater

  10. Customer responsiveness and service • Customer complaints • Call centre answering times • New measures to monitor the turn around times of • development applications • information statements

  11. Affordability • Use of restrictions and legal actions for non payment • Availability of instalment plans • New measures on • the level of applications and approvals for hardship grants • duration of restriction • average debt levels, when restrictions and legal actions were undertaken

  12. Environmental and Quality • Environmental • sewage treatment plant compliance • water reuse and biosolids recycling • trade waste critical parameter acceptance • CO2 emissions • Drinking water quality • Population receiving water meeting standards • E. coli • Turbidity

  13. Key Issues • Compared to previously reported information, the proposed indicator set shows • increased emphasis on environmental, reuse and recycling, affordability measures, and development activities • greater disaggregating of information on network reliability and complaints • a reduction in a number of performance indicators • greater coordination with various government and regulatory agencies

  14. Key issues • Minimising reporting cost • considerable effort to improve reporting arrangement and consistency of information between government agencies • project to establish joint information template • believe most businesses already collect the majority of the information • necessary for managing the business not just regulatory purposes

  15. Key issues • Affordability • customer representatives and DHS suggested disaggregation of data between concession & non-concession households • consumption • affordability • Future review • preference for stable indicator set • need to take account of changing events, such as release of White Paper

  16. Reporting and Auditing • Reporting arrangements to be similar to those applied to the metropolitan water retailers • information reported in accordance with performance indicators and definitions • quarterly and annual submission of data standardised templates • regulatory audits to verify the accuracy and reliability of reported information • analysis of reported data in annual performance report • before release opportunity for businesses to comment on draft report

  17. Next Steps • Indicative Timelines • Working Group meeting (24 June 2004) • Finalise performance indicators (July 2004) • First audits (Aug – Oct 2005) • First Statewide performance report (late 2005) • reporting in Melbourne continues as before

More Related