SlideServe
Menu
Préférences
© SlideServe · v2026

Information Services, Topology and Discovery Working Group IS- WG

peigi avatar
17 diapositives · 280 Views · Jul 18, 2014

Join us at the IS-WG Spring Member Meeting on April 28th, 2009, to discuss the purpose, current status, use cases, IP summarization, and trust models of information services. Explore network topology, services discovery, and trust within the information services plane.

Information Services, Topology and Discovery Working Group IS- WG - slide 1
01 / 17Information Services, Topology and Discovery Working Group IS- WG
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Information Services, Topology and Discovery Working Group IS- WG
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation
  1. Information Services, Topology and Discovery Working GroupIS-WG Spring Member Meeting April 28th, 2009

  2. Agenda • WG Purpose • Current Status and Deployment • Use-case review • IP Summarization • Trust models

  3. WG Purpose • Various network services use a common "Information Services plane" that allows users to discover network topology and the location and capabilities of network services within that topology. As global federation of network services occurs, the standardization and flexibility of the network-centric Information Services becomes even more critical • Currently, the same infrastructure is used by • DCN • perfSONAR • Phoebus data movement service • In order to help catalyze and focus the development of these common information services, the Internet2 Network Advisory Committee (NTAC) has commissioned the creation of this working group • The group will work to • further define the role and functionality of Information Services • drive design and development • Interface with standards and community organizations (IETF, OGF, GLIF)

  4. Current Status • As part of perfSONAR, we have defined a common IS for network services • What are the requirements? • Represent services with network context • We have a topology schema that helps address this

  5. Deployment • http://dc211.internet2.edu/cgi-bin/perfAdmin/directory.cgi • http://dc211.internet2.edu/cgi-bin/perfAdmin/tree.cgi

  6. Use cases • Control Plane • Host discovery • Service discovery • Pathfinding • Performance Measurement • Archived data discovery • Measurement point discovery • Network topology abstractions • “What is close?” • This includes proximity to the querier, proximity to a path, proximity to another resource

  7. Use cases • Control Plane • Host discovery • Service discovery • Pathfinding • Performance Measurement • Archived data discovery • Measurement point discovery • Network topology abstractions • “What is close?” • This includes proximity to the querier, proximity to a path, proximity to another resource

  8. IP Summarization

  9. IP Summarization

  10. IP Summarization Status • Ongoing work on the algorithm • Tension between “close” summarization and broad summarizations • Can we augment the IS model with CIDR-style queries • Longest match • All matches • Exact maches

  11. Discussion: Trust • Topology elements and services are registered at the edges • What is the trust model? • What is necessary?

  12. Trust Issues • Hypothesis: Information is more valuable if it is signed by whomever registers it • “Who says?” • We might add “Authority” to Authentication, Authorization • If topology is signed, how can it be validated? • Is a chain of agents sufficient?

  13. Authority topo