1 / 19

Integrated Regional Water Management Grant Program

This guide covers the step-by-step process for applying to the Integrated Regional Water Management Grant Program, including eligibility review, technical review, consensus review, and selection panel procedures. It also provides details on the application schedule, submission requirements, and important points of contact.

penny
Télécharger la présentation

Integrated Regional Water Management Grant Program

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Integrated Regional Water Management Grant Program Applicant Workshops Implementation Grant, Step 2 March 20 – March 29, 2006 Riverside, Sacramento, and Santa Nella

  2. Agenda • Introduction • Process Overview • PSP Overview • Specific Topic Table Rotations

  3. Introductions/Purpose

  4. Purpose • Provide General Overview of Process • Provide Individual Technical Assistance

  5. Process Overview

  6. Implementation Grant, Step 2 Summary • $150 Million funding for this round. • 16 applications invited back for Step 2. • $25 Million per award for this round. • Step 2 is treated as a separate solicitation • No carry over of ranking • In FAAST – not a call back

  7. Review Process • Eligibility Review • Technical Review • Independent reviews by at least 3 reviewers • Initial scores established • Consensus Review • Consensus among technical reviewers • Single review, scores and supporting comments

  8. Review Process • Senior review • Consistent application of criteria and scoring • Resolve any non-consensus • Selection Panel • Consistency amongst reviews • Consistency against criteria • Preliminary funding recommendations to • DWR Director • The State Water Board

  9. Review Process • Management Approval • Release of preliminary funding recommendations to public • Public Meeting • Receive comment • Management Decision • Consider comments • Final awards determined

  10. Schedule • June 8, 2006 – Applications due • June 2006 to Aug 2006 – Proposal reviews • Sept 2006 • Release Preliminary Funding Recommendations • Meeting • Comment Period • October 2006 • Consider public comments • Final Funding List • November 2006 – Awards announced

  11. Aids to Completing the Application • Guidelines and PSP • This Workshop • Point of Contacts for the State: • General - in PSP (PSP questions, FAAST, UWMP) • Specific – one person for each application • Fill-able Tables - online

  12. PSP Overview

  13. What to Submit Complete application consists of: • Online application with attachments • includes IRWM Plan or FED • 3 hard copies of the application • 3 hard copies of the most recent plans & specifications • CD of all applicable references

  14. What to Submit Label hard copies and CD’s with: • “IRWMP Implementation Grant, Step 2” • PIN (from FAAST) • Applicant name • Proposal Title

  15. Deadline for Submittal • All portions of the application must be received by 5:00 pm June 8, 2006 • Allow time for delivery of hard copy/CD • Do not change electronic attachments after hard copies are shipped

  16. PSP Highlights • Attachment 1 – Authorization & Eligibility • Resolution • UWMP • GWMP • Attachments 2-4 – IRWM Plan • New to Step 2 • Attachments 5-8 – Proposal

  17. PSP Highlights • Attachment 9 – Monitoring Projects (PAEP) • Help here at workshop • Attachments 10 & 11 – Econ & Benefits • Help here at workshop • Attachments 12-13 – Preferences & Priorities • Scored separately

  18. PSP Highlights (con’t) • Attachments 14 – 17 (as applicable) • Changes from Step 1 to 2 • Stream Channel Modification • CALFED ROD Consistency • Letters of Support/Opposition

  19. General Questions

More Related