1 / 16

Catching a Ball

Catching a Ball. Ayesha Akbar Johanna Loya Sirisha Bhadriraju. Background—Catching a Ball. Michael Land’s hypotheses: Role of eye movements in cricket: to anticipate bounce point Purpose of smooth pursuit

peri
Télécharger la présentation

Catching a Ball

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Catching a Ball Ayesha Akbar Johanna Loya SirishaBhadriraju

  2. Background—Catching a Ball • Michael Land’s hypotheses: • Role of eye movements in cricket: to anticipate bounce point • Purpose of smooth pursuit ** Eyes work to predict movement + move to points revealing greatest and most valuable information • Our own: • Does this apply to simpler activities (catching a ball) and to less skilled participants?

  3. Background—Catching a Ball • Other confirmed Land hypotheses: • All! • Our focus: • Anticipation times • Distance between fixation point during bounce and actual bounce point • Whether or not underhanded, bounce-less throws make a difference in eye movement sequence and frequency

  4. Subject A (Sirisha) • Measured from end saccade to bounce time • Range: 0—268 (high outlier) ms • Mean: 67 ms • Stand error: 34.29 ms

  5. Subject B (Johanna) • Several saccades counted in one “saccade” -> longer times recorded • Range: 0—234 (high outlier) ms • Mean: 66.9 ms • Standard error: 25.39 ms

  6. Conclusions • Other than a couple of high outliers in both subjects’ trials, anticipation was fairly regular • Anticipation of bounce point almost identical between subjects (A: mean 67 msvs. B: mean 66.9 ms) • Corrective saccades usually preceded anticipation times of zero ms. • Corrective saccades more frequent in less skilled participants?

  7. Distance Between Fixation and Bounce Point • Both subjects consistently fixated above the bounce point (likely to predict where the ball will travel next). • Subject A distance: • Range: 3.98—14.44 degrees • Mean: 8.60 degrees • Standard error: 1.49 degrees • Subject B distance: • Range: 3.78—13.30 degrees • Mean: 6.97 degrees • Standard error: 0.98 degrees

  8. Conclusions • Subject A tended to fixate higher above the predicted bounce point than did Subject B. • Subjects fixate above bounce point to predict where ball will travel next • Subject A consistently left more room for error/unexpected ball trajectory

  9. Underhand Throw/No Bounce • Same subjects participated; Subject A recorded • High, underhanded throws • Saccades occurring before and after peak (apex) of throw were counted

  10. Conclusions • High underhand throws generally follow a pattern: • Ball is thrown • Catcher makes between 1-3 saccades to predicted trajectory apex • During ball’s descent (following apex), catcher engages in smooth pursuit until ball is received

  11. Ayesha Akbar Johanna Loya Sirisha Bhadriraju

More Related