180 likes | 384 Vues
Seattle Center City Streetcar Workshop. July 20, 2007. Evaluation Criteria for Seattle Streetcars. Transit Plan - Goal . … Transit every 15 minutes … 18 hours a day … 7 days a week …. Existing and Future Transit. Seattle Candidate Streetcar Corridors.
E N D
Seattle Center City Streetcar Workshop July 20, 2007
Transit Plan - Goal … Transit every 15 minutes … 18 hours a day … 7 days a week …
Seattle Candidate Streetcar Corridors • All UVTN routes are initial candidates for streetcar service. • Today: • Criteria Evaluation • Mapping Exercise
Screening Criteria • Grade • Street Geometry • Physical Barriers • Possible Terminal Location • Utilities • Volume/Capacity Ratio • Duplication of Service • Transit-Supportive Land Uses • Industrial Zoning
Grade • Grades inhibit streetcar operations • 0% to 6% - acceptable • 6% to 10% - if all other screening criteria are met • > 10% - eliminated
Street Geometry • Interchanges • Turning movements (<90° unacceptable) • Weaving or curvature needs • Exclusive right-of-way needs • Transit priority needs (bridges, underpasses) • Wheel noise
Other Physical Barriers • Low bridges or skyways • >14’ of vertical clearance • < 14’ of vertical clearance – fatal flaw • Narrow streets • Lane widths narrower than 10 ft is a fatal flaw • At-grade freight railroad crossing • Requires difficult approval process – fatal flaw
Terminal Location • Needs reasonable location to terminate and connect to other transit: • No strong connection to transit hub is treated as a fatal flaw
Utilities • Relocation of major utilities (water, storm or sanitary) may be too costly: • >6 ft from trackway • 3-6 ft from trackway • <3 ft from trackway
Speed and Reliability • Traffic congestion inhibits successful streetcar • Corridor or segments with volume/lane ratios greater than the average plus one standard deviation is treated as a fatal flaw(unless exclusive ROW)
Duplication of Service • Corridors that directly compete for riders with existing or programmed LRT service should be eliminated.
Land Use Types, cont’d • “Low” transit-supportive land use: • Residential density < 10 units/acre • Industrial • Low-scale commercial development • No significant mixed-use development
Industrial Zoning • Streetcar garage needs to be located on track connected to main alignment: • No industrial zoning within ½ mile of corridor is treated as a fatal flaw.
Summary • Physical Barriers • Low bridges or skyways • >14’ vertical clearance • < 14’ vertical clearance • Lane widths narrower than 10 ft • At-grade freight railroad crossing • Possible Terminal Location • No strong connection to transit hub is treated as a fatal flaw • Grade • 0% to 6% - acceptable • 6% to 10% - if all other screening criteria are met • > 10% - eliminated • Street Geometry • Interchanges • Turning movements (<90° unacceptable) • Weaving or curvature needs • Exclusive right-of-way needs • Transit priority needs • Wheel noise
Summary, Cont’d • Duplication of Service • Corridors that directly compete for riders with existing or programmed LRT • Transit-Supportive Land Uses • See list • Industrial Zoning • No industrial zoning within ½ mile of corridor • Utilities • >6 ft from trackway • 3-6 ft from trackway • <3 ft from trackway • Volume/Capacity Ratio • Volume/lane ratios greater than the average plus one standard deviation