1 / 9

Independent Review Schedule Update on GNSO Improvement Process

This report provides an update on the independent review schedule for ICANN's GNSO improvement process, including the direction, elements, and recommendations made. It also discusses the proposed review schedule for other entities and the GNSO improvement process led by the Board Governance Committee.

peugene
Télécharger la présentation

Independent Review Schedule Update on GNSO Improvement Process

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Report on Independent Review Schedule Update on GNSO Improvement Process December 2006 Denise Michel Vice President, Policy Development

  2. Independent Reviews - Purpose • Bylaws call for periodic, independent review of ICANN’s SO’s, Councils, Advisory Committees (except GAC) and NomCom. • Intended to ensure independent examination ICANN’s structure and operations. • Part of ICANN’s commitment to its evolution and improvement.

  3. Independent Reviews - Direction • Conducted in an objective way by independent evaluator. • Under direction of the Board Governance Committee and agreement of the Board through Terms of Reference. • With opportunities for public review and comment.

  4. Independent Reviews - Elements • First reviews: GNSO Council, December 2004; GNSO, September 2006. • Elements of GNSO review included: • Establishing terms of reference (TOR) • Issuing request for proposals (RFP) • Selecting consultant • Managing and providing information for consultant’s work • Arranging for information sharing and briefings on final report.

  5. BGC Review Schedule • Considered age, responsibilities, activities of each entity to be reviewed, and cost and operational limitations for managing/implementing reviews. • Recommended increasing the budget for each review to ensure resources match needs for professional consultants and review activities. • Agreed to comprehensive schedule for all reviews, to be reviewed by BGC for progress and potential adjustment. • Agreed to add a review of the Board to the review queue. • Review schedule is on Board’s agenda for agreement.

  6. Proposed Review Schedule • Nominating Committee – estimated launch December 2006 • At-Large Advisory Committee – estimated launch February 2007 • Board – estimated launch October 2007 • DNS Root Server System Advisory Committee – estimated launch July 2007 • Security and Stability Advisory Committee – January 2008 • ccNSO Supporting Organisation – July 2008 • Address Supporting Organisation – December 2008

  7. GNSO Review – Terms of Reference • Addressed: • Representativeness • Effectiveness • Transparency • Compliance • Used: • Operational Analysis, Statistics • Quantifying Focus Areas • Mapping Relationships and Interactions • Capturing and Mapping Perceptions

  8. GNSO Review – Recommendations 24 recommendations in four areas: • Changes need to enhance representativeness of Council, Constituencies; • GNSO operations need to be more visible, transparent to wider range of stakeholders; • GNSO structures need to be more flexible, adaptable, able to respond more directly to changing stakeholder needs; • Changes in Council’s operations needed to enhance its ability to reach genuinely consensus positions. <http://www.icann.org/announcements/gnso-review-report-sep06.pdf>

  9. GNSO Review – Improvement Process • Board Governance Committee responsible for approving a “GNSO Improvement Process” for Board agreement. • BGC considering approaches for development and adoption of improvements to GNSO’s policy activities, structure, operations, and communications. • BGC in dialogue with GNSO Council, constituency members, and community and will continue its deliberations.

More Related