E N D
2. Regional Agencies Smart Growth Strategy Bay Area Alliance for Sustainable Development Regional Livability Footprint Project
4.
Natural Increase
(Our own children)
Net Migration
(Other People)
5. Expand housing?
Constrain future job growth?
Expand infrastructure to handle
in-commuters?
Find a smarter way to grow
6. Regionwide smart growth land use vision supported by local governments.
Regulatory changes and fiscal incentives needed to implement vision.
A set of smart growth land use projections.
7. The Three Es of Smart Growth and
Sustainable Development:
8. Preserve the regions undeveloped open space and agricultural land.
Provide sufficient affordable housing.
Revitalize central cities and older suburbs.
Reduce single occupant vehicle trips.
Foster equitable economic development while minimizing displacement.
9.
Revised Regulatory Framework
Additional Incentives
Regional Context
11. Participants included:
- elected officials
- planning staff
- developers
- environmental advocates
- social equity representatives
12. Smart growth principles
Land use mapping
exercise
Affordable housing
Regulatory changes
and incentives
14. Distillation
Maps
16. Identified three draft regionwide themes and how they would play out in each county.
Conducted distillation meeting with over 100 local planners and stakeholders.
Finalized themes and regionwide maps of each alternative.
17. Identify themes that emerged from all nine Round One workshops.
All components appeared in at least one groups scenario.
Alternatives as distinct from each other as possible.
Similar regional jobs and housing levels in each alternative.
Jobs and housing totals vary by county according to theme and workshop products.
18. Environment
Transportation
Housing
Social Equity
Development Feasibility
19. Review results of first round of workshops.
Review base case, three alternatives and analysis.
Discuss regional planning principles.
Discuss needed regulatory changes and incentives.
Recommend preferred alternative.
20. Select and refine a single preferred alternative for Napa County.
21. Single regionwide vision & corresponding projections
BAASD coordinates public education & engagement campaign
Companion incentives and regulatory changes
ABAG Board considers adoption of smart growth alternative projections
Regional Transportation Plan & Clean Air Plan
Local implementation
24. Base Case
1. Central Cities
2. Network of Neighborhoods
3. Smarter Suburbs
28. Most development focused in centers of the region.
Locates compact, walkable, mixed-income, mixed use development in each countys largest city or cities.
Also locates growth in nodes around existing public transit stations.
32. Locates similar type development in same locations as Alternative 1, but less dense.
Adds development in additional areas:
existing transit nodes and major corridors.
walkable communities.
existing communities along expanded transit network.
36. Locates similar type development in same areas as Alternatives 1 and 2, but still less dense.
Locates jobs and housing at periphery to create mixed use communities.
Additional new smart growth communities.
74. Equitable Smart Growth Strategies
Provide training to current residents to obtain new high-skill jobs locally.
Match job development to skills of current residents.
Improve transit access to jobs around the region.
Provide additional retail facilities.
Cultivate business opportunities for local residents.
Alleviate overcrowding.
Maintain affordability of existing housing.
80. Shifting demographic patterns create demand for a variety of housing types:
82. location
timing
economic and local market conditions
land prices
construction costs
regulatory environment
financial requirements of the development and investment communities
political conditions
83. All provide a framework for future development
All can be modified to meet local needs
Each provides a different general direction
89. Preserve the regions undeveloped open space and agricultural land.
Provide sufficient affordable housing.
Revitalize central cities and older suburbs.
Reduce single occupant vehicle trips.
Foster equitable economic development while minimizing displacement.
92. GOAL
Refine the selected alternative for
Napa County.
93. Begin with selected alternative.
Recommend modifications.
Prioritize recommendations
Reconvene for large group decision-making.
Track changes with computerized output.
94.
Planning Areas
Place Types
96. Colored: Areas of Change
Gray: Existing Land Use
Residential Areas
Mixed-Use Areas
Town Centers/Downtowns
Employment Areas/Institutions
Hatched: Transportation-Related
Rail Stations/Major Transfer Facility Areas
Corridors
97. Place Types
Percent Increase (Dial-up)
Numerical Change
No Change from On-the-Ground Conditions
100. Varying mixes of residential and employment uses:
108. Varying land uses and densities
within each Place Type.
Apply to all of a planning area,
unless otherwise specified.
Focus on the next 20 years.
109.
Percent Increase (Dial-up)
5% Residential Increase
15% Employment Increase
Both
110.
Numerical Change
Add or subtract specific numbers of jobs or housing units
For marginal changes only
111.
No Change from On-the-Ground Conditions
Preserve planning area as it is today
Preserve open space
Preserve todays development as is
112. Broad brush, regional perspective
County-wide interaction
113. Regional Agencies Smart Growth Strategy Bay Area Alliance for Sustainable Development Regional Livability Footprint Project