1 / 21

Staffordshire & Stoke on Trent Multi-Agency Safeguarding Hub

Staffordshire & Stoke on Trent Multi-Agency Safeguarding Hub. John Maddox MASH Development Officer. Information Sharing in action. Your Speaker today and the dark arts !!. WHY ?. Why do we need MASH in Staffordshire The Evidence was clear and difficult..we lost children BSK410 & NS10.

phil
Télécharger la présentation

Staffordshire & Stoke on Trent Multi-Agency Safeguarding Hub

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Staffordshire & Stoke on TrentMulti-Agency Safeguarding Hub John Maddox MASH Development Officer

  2. Information Sharing in action

  3. Your Speaker today and the dark arts !!

  4. WHY ?

  5. Why do we need MASH in Staffordshire • The Evidence was clear and difficult..we lost children • BSK410 & NS10

  6. Concept • Sharing more information. • Undertaking Early Risk Assessment • A ‘whole family’ approach to safeguarding. • Enhanced data sharing and analysis to join up the information available about a family to support and/or intervene to protect the vulnerable. • Creating a confidential environment where proportionality necessity & justification allow information to be released to operational staff.

  7. Who is in MASH • Staffordshire County Council Children & Adults • Staffordshire Police • Staffs & Stoke NHS Partnership Trust • Stoke on Trent City Council Children & Adults • SWMPT (MAPPA) • North Staffs Combined Mental Health (maybe)

  8. The Challenges • Culture • Fear • Knowledge • Ignorance • The law • Doing what we have always done • Not my responsibility

  9. Solutions • Having a face to face process • Creating a Confidential Environment • An agreed MOU • Right level of decision maker • Professionally Disagree • Applied Multi agency thinking • Professional judgement • Trust & Confidence

  10. MOU • Builds on existing agreements • Two stage process – Reveal & Disclose • Audit Process • Have a legal basis • Handling Protocols & info ownership • Escalation process

  11. Essential Elements • Governance

  12. Cohorts/Populations:- High Risk Children referrals (Safeguarding & above) Vulnerable Adult (No secrets) referrals Domestic Abuse-Victims & Perpetrators and repeat cases Domestic Violence screening for Children & Vulnerable Adults Missing persons Child Sexual Exploitation Hate Crime Some Professional Concern cases (issues raised by professionals but not clear as to the cohort at referral stage)

  13. SO WHAT !! More referral's equals more information sharing More Information Sharing equals more opportunity for Safeguarding More Safeguarding means opportunity for early intervention Early intervention means less need acute services More discussions mean better decisions about who should attend

  14. Performance • (February & March 2013) • Total throughput = 6723 • MASHED = 1919 (as of 21/05/13= 3851) • Equals = 29% info sharing • 41% Domestic Abuse • 36% Children • 10% Adults • 4% Child Sexual Exploitation • 9% other cohorts

  15. What impact re Risks • Exit severities following Mashing : • From Single agency assessment incoming to output by MASH • 66% Unchanged • 27% Raised • 7% Lowered • Re referral rate = 5.2%

  16. Prepare for change How to eat an elephant – one piece at a time ; Gradual introduction of cohorts of cases Design of the physical change of information sharing Things to watch out for

  17. We view full information sharing as a compliment to already established systems.

  18. Introducing a wave of multiagency demand through a single point of information sharing is likely to result in a monumental bottle neck.

  19. It’s worth it

  20. Questions

More Related