1 / 34

Enhancement Grants FY 2013

Kristie Davis, Assistant Director Administration & Accountability. Enhancement Grants FY 2013. Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. September 2012. Enhancement Grant. Purpose Who’s Eligible Allowable/Unallowable Important Dates Steps in the Process Conclusion.

phillipsullivan
Télécharger la présentation

Enhancement Grants FY 2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Kristie Davis, Assistant Director Administration & Accountability Enhancement Grants FY 2013 Missouri Department of Elementaryand Secondary Education September 2012

  2. Enhancement Grant • Purpose • Who’s Eligible • Allowable/Unallowable • Important Dates • Steps in the Process • Conclusion

  3. Enhancement Grant • Purpose • Provide funding to improve existing and establish occupational career education programs • Grant funds can only be used to fund programs listed as High Demand Occupations • State Funds

  4. Enhancement Grant • Who’s Eligible • Missouri public high schools, area career centers and community colleges currently operating Department-approved occupational preparatory (long-term) career education programs

  5. Enhancement Grant FY-2013 • Allowable Expenditures • Equipment (75% Reimbursement) • Instruction equipment directly related to occupational career ($200 minimum unit cost) • Allowed every 3 years • Based on student enrollment • If the class has 20 students enrolled, then only 20 computers will be allowed.

  6. Enhancement Grant FY-2013 • Allowable Expenditures: • Other (Reimbursed at 50%) • Software (no min unit cost) • Network or internet connections (no min cost) • Student and instructor instructional furniture [i.e. workstations*] ($200 min unit cost) • Software service contracts/maintenance agreements (no min unit cost) • Instructor training** (no min unit cost) • Storage cabinets for program specific equipment ($200 min unit cost)

  7. Allowable Expenditures  • Allowable Expenditures • Curriculum Enhancement 50/50 • Purchased curriculum materials, videos, DVDs, reference sets, etc. ($200 min unit cost). • Facility Improvement 50/50 • Renovation or modification of existing facilities must have a direct effect on instruction in the program. Materials only, and no overall facility renovations. No more then 25% of the total grant

  8. Enhancement Grant FY-2013 • Non Allowable • Items under $200/unit cost (unless exempt) • Consumables • Monthly/annual usage charges or membership charges • New Construction • Curriculum Development • Photocopying • Installation or labor costs to renovate facilities • Non-instructional furniture including teacher and students chairs and desks

  9. New Allowable Programs • Project Lead The Way • FCS- ProStart I and ProStart II

  10. Enhancement Grant FY-2013 • ProStart I &ProStart II will be considered for enhancement grant funding pending: • Full program • 400 hrs of employment for students • Passing year I and year II exams • Approval by MO ProStart Coordinator (Hank Huitt) • Registration with the National Restaurant Association and meet Association requirements • Have a separate advisory committee

  11. Enhancement Grant FY-2013 • Continued… • Teacher professional development • i.e. seeking certification as a Certified Secondary Foodservice Educator • Large percent of students taking the end of first year and second year ProStart exams • Connection with industry • Provide mentoring experiences for students • Large number of students receiving the Certificate of Achievement

  12. Enhancement Grant FY-2013 • PLTW • Must be an approved PLTW program with proper certification • Contact Ben Yates yatesbk@mst.edu • Only secondary • BioMedical and Engineering

  13. Proposal Format • Application • Statement(s) of Need • Description of Improvements • Description of Evaluation System • Copy of New or Expanding Program Proposal(s) if applicable • Budget Detail Sheet • FV-4

  14. Statement of Need • Make sure program is on the High Demand List for your area of the state. • Why do you need the funding for your Program? • What will the funds be used for and how will the items requested improve the CTE program and enhance student learning?

  15. Planned improvements • What are your planned improvements and how will they support the statement of need (i.e. program and student enhancement and achievement) • Must be broken down by teacher and location. • Each teacher/room must have a separate FV-4 & FV-2.

  16. Evaluation System • How do you determine locally if your program is successful or whether the improvements implemented through the use of grant funds had a positive influence upon the identified needs? • How do you evaluate student performance in the program area?

  17. Budget Detail • One budget detail for all programs • Indicate the following: • CIP code • Program name • New or existing • Anticipated enrollment • Demand occupation determination • Proposed total and grant fund expenditures for each program area

  18. Enhancement Grant • Important Dates • Changes Due by December 31, 2012 • July 1, 2012 through May 15, 2013 • Grant award time frame • Items can’t be purchase prior to July 1 • March 31st 2013 • FV-2’s due for reimbursement for current school year (March 31, 2013) • Request for FY 2014 • Usually the last business day in February (Thursday February 28, 2013).

  19. Enhancement Grant FY-2013 Beginning FY 2013 all change requests must be submitted by December 31st.

  20. Review & Update 2012-2013 SY Technical Skill Attainment Missouri Departmentof Elementary and Secondary Education

  21. When Should the TSA Assessments Be Given?

  22. Secondary • Typically seniors • Administered at the end of program completion • Must be a concentrator • LEA responsible for contacting testing vendor to coordinating assessment dates and testing criteria/requirements • http://www.dese.mo.gov/divcareered/perkins_iv_tsa.htm

  23. How Do You Determine if a Student Passes or Fails the Assessment?

  24. Determining Pass/Fail • 4 Ways to Determine TSA Pass/Fail • 1. Testing vendor provides cut score • 2. National average • 3. Bundle (average to determine cut score) • 4. 65% Cut Score

  25. Reporting TSA • Data submitted in June reporting cycle in student’s core file • All student concentrators must be reported as 1 of the 6 TSA code-sets (chart next slide)

  26. Technical Skill Attainment

  27. Who is Responsible for Giving Skills Assessment? • Administered by the institution where student completes the career education program • If a student completes several career education programs, it will be a local decision to report which assessment most accurately reflects the personal plan of study

  28. Who Will Pay for TSA Assessments? • Perkins Funds • Local Funds • At this point, there are no additional funds available to pay for technical skill assessments. • It is a local decision to determine how Perkins funds are distributed among its’ members

  29. Technical Skill Attainment • Steps Toward Improvement • Striving for more consistency and accountability • Aligning assessments with competencies and standards • Developing assessments as needed • Narrowing approved assessment options

  30. Technical Skill Attainment-UPDATE • Perkins TSA Performance Indicators Secondary • 2012-2013: 100% test 63.00% pass Postsecondary/Adult • 2012-2013: 100% test 72.50% pass

  31. Contact Us Office of College & Career Readiness Kristie Davis 573-526-4987 Kristie.Davis@dese.mo.gov

More Related