1 / 8

Stanley M. Kaye, PPPL C. Bush, ORNL Rajesh Maingi, ORNL Hendrik Meyer, MAST ITPA Meeting

Status of L-H Threshold Analysis and Recent Results From STs. Stanley M. Kaye, PPPL C. Bush, ORNL Rajesh Maingi, ORNL Hendrik Meyer, MAST ITPA Meeting Lisbon, Portugal 8-10 November 2004. L-H Threshold vs Probed as Part of NSTX/MAST Identity Experiment. NSTX #111378 277msec

phuc
Télécharger la présentation

Stanley M. Kaye, PPPL C. Bush, ORNL Rajesh Maingi, ORNL Hendrik Meyer, MAST ITPA Meeting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Status of L-H Threshold Analysis and Recent Results From STs Stanley M. Kaye, PPPL C. Bush, ORNL Rajesh Maingi, ORNL Hendrik Meyer, MAST ITPA Meeting Lisbon, Portugal 8-10 November 2004 1

  2. L-H Threshold vs Probed as Part of NSTX/MAST Identity Experiment NSTX #111378 277msec MAST #8851 200msec Z (m) R (m) rtEFIT crucial for fine Drsep control Vary Drsep to study PLH vs configuration PLH in double-null (Drsep<1 mm)comparable 350 kW @ 0.5 MA, 0.45 T PLH significantly higher for |Drsep|>1 mm 2 (Maingi, Meyer)

  3. H-mode physics on MAST close to double null H. Meyer et.al. 5cm  8 i L/H transition physics: • Reduced L/H threshold in exact double null configuration on MAST, NSTX and ASDEX Upgrade. • Possible cause: difference of radial electric field in L-mode. ELM stability: • Edge profiles in single null are more stable to ELMs on MAST than in double null. • Not due to effect of 2nd X-point on magnetic shear. -1 kV/m Difference of Er between exact DN and lower SN in L-mode. 3

  4. Results for Ohmic H-mode Scoping Study (NSTX) • H-modes at 600 to 900 kA, 3.0 to 4.5 kG TF • Short H-mode at Ip = 600 kA, Bt = 3 kG • OH H-modes obtained for 1st time ever on NSTX during this run • Most readily obtained after hot boronization • Alternating helium conditioning shots seem to help • Obtained both double null (DN) and lower single null (LSN) divertor • Most short duration, some with ELMs and some ELM-free • Peaked ne • ELMy: Small high frequency ELMs keep ears from developing • ELM-free: have ears, but edge peak lower than central ne 4

  5. Decrease in Er in NSTX Prior 30 ms Prior to L-H Transition 5

  6. PLOSS for NBI and OH H-modes 6 (Bush)

  7. Test of L/H transition theories against MAST data H. Meyer et.al. Statistical comparison: • Four leading theories tested using fit to high resolution Thomson scattering. • MAST data support finite  drift-wave turbulence suppression by self generated flow shear [Guzdar et.al., PRL, (2001)]. • Predicted critical Te needs to be scaled by factor of ~2 for quantitative agreement. Profile comparison in L-mode just below Pthr: • Kinetic profiles not affected by change in magnetic configuration from L-SN to C-DN. • Element of physics leading to easier H-mode access in exact DN not included in tested theories. 7

  8. L-H Transition Theories Have Limited Predictive Capability For NSTX Peeling Drift Alfvén No agreement with finite-b drift wave theory 8 (Kaye)

More Related