160 likes | 271 Vues
This feature provides managers the ability to report widgets by colour, allowing easy identification of gaps in the portfolio to enhance it with new widgets. Options include reporting via WRS, WCS, or no change. Evaluate Options 1 (strategic, 30 FP) and 2 (tactical, 3 FP) based on pros and cons. The selected option is Option 2 (tactical). Risks include poor user adoption of the tactical solution, while dependencies rely on WCS v2.0.
E N D
Widget Catalogue SystemFeature Scope Definition F001 Widget Colour Reporting - Tactical
Objectives & Benefits • Objectives • Provide ability for managers to report widgets by colour • Benefits • Managers can easily identify colour gaps in widget portfolio, with a view to adding new widgets to the portfolio
Options • Report via WRS • Report via WCS • Do nothing
Option 1 – Pros and Cons • Effort • 30 FP • Pros • Uses strategic reporting tool • Gives most flexibility • Cons • Highest effort
Option 2 – Pros and Cons • Effort • 3 FP • Pros • Uses existing capability • Minimal effort • Cons • Less user friendly • Takes longer to identify colour gaps (but only takes about an hour anyway)
Option 3 – Pros and Cons • Effort • 0 FP • Pros • Zero effort • Cons • No improvement from as-is
Selected Option • Option 2 (tactical) • Option 1 (strategic)
Risks, Issues, Assumptions, Dependencies • Risks • WCS search config doesn’t support search by colour • Mitigation: proof of concept • Poor use take-up of tactical solution • Mitigation: identify champion form user community • Dependencies • Depends on WCS v2.0 (which includes search config capability)