1 / 7

APLNG Roundtable

APLNG Roundtable. Analyzing Sophal Ear: Escaping the Khmer Rouge Esther Prins Adult Education Program. Deciding what and how to analyze. Watched and listened to video Read transcript Struck by narrator’s description of mother’s actions

piera
Télécharger la présentation

APLNG Roundtable

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. APLNG Roundtable Analyzing Sophal Ear: Escaping the Khmer Rouge Esther Prins Adult Education Program

  2. Deciding what and how to analyze • Watched and listened to video • Read transcript • Struck by narrator’s description of mother’s actions • Decided to use Ahearn’s (2001) definition of agency • “Culturally constrained capacity to act” • Reviewed Ahearn’s analysis of letter • Use of “sensitizing concepts” (Blumer, 1969)

  3. Analytical Procedures • Highlighted instances of: • External forces acting upon narrator, family (subject, verb) • Actions taken by narrator, family (subject, verb) • Resources for agency: who or what created opportunity to act or enhanced ability to act • Operationalized codes (iterative) • Added 4th code: obstacles to achieving desired result

  4. Analytical Procedures • Added 5th code to reflect outcomes of actions • Mother’s actions  • She passed test • Family moved to Vietnam • Speaker is “here today” (and narrative therefore exists) • Mother is present at TED talk • Speaker’s actions  • Tribunal accepted complaint registering father’s death • Theoretical significance: Agentic acts don’t necessarily achieve desired result (Ahearn, Lareau)

  5. What was done to narrator, parents, family by others • Agency: narrator, parents, family take action • Resources for agency (what created opportunity or enhanced ability to act) • Constraints & obstacles (factors that undermined likelihood of achieving desired result) • Outcome of agency

  6. Analytical Procedures • Transferred text and analysis to NVivo • The paths not taken • Characterization of the Khmer Rouge • Description of place (Cambodia and Vietnam): pretty, idyllic, fear, freedom, lawless

  7. References • Ahearn, L. (2001). Invitations to love: Literacy, love letters, and social change in Nepal. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. • Ahearn, L. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 109–37. • Blumer, H. (1969) Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. • Lareau, A. (2003). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. • Lareau, A., & Horvat, E. M. (1999). Moments of social inclusion and exclusion: Race, class, and cultural capital in family-school relationships. Sociology of Education, 72(1), 37-53.

More Related