1 / 18

U se of Sub- N ational I ndicators to Improve P ublic H ealth in E urope

U se of Sub- N ational I ndicators to Improve P ublic H ealth in E urope. Dr Lorraine Stewart Principal Public Health Specialist 4 March 2010. Rationale of Project.

pottsj
Télécharger la présentation

U se of Sub- N ational I ndicators to Improve P ublic H ealth in E urope

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Use of Sub-National Indicators to Improve Public Health in Europe Dr Lorraine Stewart Principal Public Health Specialist 4 March 2010

  2. Rationale of Project • Many indicators sets such as ENHIS, ECHIM, and ECHI are available to enable national assessment of the health status of a population • Policies and interventions which deliver positive outcome(s) nationally may not be effective within some sub-populations • Given this, this consortium felt there was a need to develop a harmonised environmental health information system of sub-national indicators to complement the national indicators set.

  3. Aim • Context: Within the framework of Work Plan 2008 for the implementation of the Second Programme for Community Action in the field of Public Health (2008-2013), this project aims to develop a sustainable environmental health monitoring system consisting of a set of sub-national/regional indicators to improve public health across Europe and facilitate the comparability of health status and data and identify policies and interventions that deliver positive health outcomes

  4. Overview

  5. Project Value • 3 year project • (March 2009 – February 2012) • Co-funded by DG Sanco • Value: €920K • 7 European Partners

  6. Partners • Collaborating Partners • WHO ECEH Bonn, Germany • West Midlands Public Health Observatory, UK • Scottish Government Directorate of Health & Wellbeing, UK • Lead Partner • HPA, UK • Associate Partners • ISCIII, Spain • VASC, Lithuania • IPHB, Romania • IVZ-RS, Slovenia • NIEH, Hungary • LIGA.NRW, Germany

  7. Specific Objectives • To develop a core set of sub-national environment and health indicators • To develop a system for harmonised health information collection • To examine the feasibility of harmonised data collection for indicators not fully developed by ENHIS, if appropriate • To raise awareness and promote participation • To produce a compendium of policies and interventions • To develop a methodology for regional comparison

  8. Organisational Structure of the Project Steering Group WP3 Evaluation WP2 Dissemination WP1 Coordination WP9 Conference WP7 Methods for RegionalComparison WP4 Selection of Indicators WP8 Compendium ofPolicies, Interventions WP5 Methods for Collationof New Data WP6 Harmonised Environment & Health System Project Organisation

  9. Timescale

  10. Deliverables

  11. Progress to Date • Selection of core set of indicators • Development of methodological sheets • Data collation for core set of indicators • Identification of new indicators • Development of Database

  12. Core Set of Indicators MORTALITY, INJURY

  13. Core Set of Indicators OUTBREAKS, INCIDENCE

  14. Core Set of Indicators ENVIRONMENT, SOCIO-ECONOMIC STATUS

  15. Methodological Sheet Template

  16. Upcoming Events • UNIPHE promotional conference – 27/28th September 2010 • System demonstration – February 2011

  17. Contact Details • For further information please visit: http://www.uniphe.eu • Project Lead: Lorraine Stewart • Email: uniphe@hpa.org.uk

More Related