1 / 13

GLM Val Tool Overview

GLM Val Tool Overview. Monte Bateman. Introduction. GLM is an optical instrument Closest analog is LIS Have several ground-based, 24x7 networks; all are RF sensors Comparison between RF & optical characteristics of lightning ?. Tool to Validate the GLM System.

presley
Télécharger la présentation

GLM Val Tool Overview

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. GLM Val ToolOverview Monte Bateman

  2. Introduction • GLM is an optical instrument • Closest analog is LIS • Have several ground-based, 24x7 networks; all are RF sensors • Comparison between RF & optical characteristics of lightning?

  3. Tool to Validate the GLM System • Compare with any other available lightning data • Model after RTMM • Display multiple data sets • Calculate, plot & track all statistics • Show trending • Flag problems

  4. How to Validate GLM? • “Game Changer” • Optical sensor; ground-based network are RF == different physics • LIS on TRMM (maybe); LIS on ISS (maybe) • Range/FOV:WWLLN has the range, but uniformly low DE ~10% • DE: NLDN/GLD360 has the range, but mainly sees ground flashes • DE: LMA has the DE, but is range-limited

  5. Statistics: FDE • Flash detection efficiency • Measure against what? • WWLLN is global, but only about 10% DE • NLDN sees about 80% of ground, 15% of cloud • ENTLN? more later... • LMA best DE, but range-limited • LMA probably the best candidate for FDE

  6. Statistics: FLA • Flash location accuracy • Same questions • GLM pixels are (on average) 9km x 9km • LMA has accuracy to a few hundred meters • LMA looks at different physics -- won't agree on what a flash is, let alone where it is • NLDN (GLD360?) probably the best candidate for FLA

  7. Statistics: FTA • Flash time accuracy • GLM integrates 2ms frames • LMA has timing accuracy to 100 ns, but again, different physics • LMA may work, but NLDN probably the best candidate for FTA

  8. Val Tool Map

  9. Comparison Study:WWLLN & ENTLN • Needed to fully characterize other networks • Compared with LIS, the best analog for GLM • Groups to strokes • Comparison methodology -- time/space window selection • Groups to strokes -- ended up being flash comparisons

  10. WWLLN Timeline Plot

  11. ENTLN Timeline Plot

  12. WWLLN Map

  13. ENTLN Map

More Related