SlideServe
Menu
Préférences
© SlideServe · v2026

The Evolution of Constitutional Law: From Confederation to Federal Government

psyche avatar
23 diapositives · 400 Views · Jul 30, 2012

The history of constitutional law in the United States before and after the Revolutionary War. Initially, states desired a confederation with a weak national government, leading to the 1787 decision to amend the Articles of Confederation. The U.S. Constitution established a federal government with distinct branches, limited powers, and provisions like the Commerce Clause, Supremacy Clause, and Bill of Rights. It discusses significant Supreme Court cases that shaped commerce regulation, freedom of speech, and due process, emphasizing the balance between state and federal powers.

The Evolution of Constitutional Law: From Confederation to Federal Government - slide 1
01 / 23The Evolution of Constitutional Law: From Confederation to Federal Government
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

The Evolution of Constitutional Law: From Confederation to Federal Government
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation
  1. Chapter 5Constitutional Law

  2. History • Before the Revolutionary War, States wanted a confederation with weak national government and very limited powers. • After the war, in 1787, the States voted to amend Articles of Confederation and create a new, federal government that shared power with States.

  3. §1: Constitutional Powers of Government • Constitution established a federal form of government with checks and balances among three branches: executive, legislative and judicial. • National government has limited, enumerated powers delegated from States. • Privileges and Immunities Clause (Art. IV §2) • Full Faith and Credit Clause (Art. IV §1)

  4. U.S. Commerce Clause • Power to regulate interstate commerce defined in Gibbons v. Ogden (1824). • Expansion to private businesses began with Wickard v. Fillburn (1942). Today, Commerce Clause it authorizes the national government to regulate virtually any business enterprise, including internet. Limits: U.S. v. Lopez (1995). • Case 5.1:Reno v. Condon (2000).

  5. State Commerce • States possess inherent police powers to regulate health, safety, public order, morals and general welfare. • “Dormant” Commerce Clause. • Case 5.2:Ferguson v. Friendfinders. Inc. (2002). • State laws that substantially interfere with interstate commerce will be struck down.

  6. Supremacy Clause and Federal Preemption • Article VI of the Constitution “Supreme Law of the Land.” • In case of direct conflict between state and federal law, state law is invalid. • Congress can preempt states. • Federal Taxing and Spending Powers.

  7. §2: Business and the Bill of Rights • Bill of Rights are not absolute. • Originally the Bill of Rights was a limit on the national government’s powers. • During the early 1900’s, the Supreme Court applied the Bill of Rights to the States via the “due process” clause of the 14th amendment.

  8. Freedom of Speech • Afforded highest protection by courts. • Symbolic Speech. • Texas v. Johnson (1989). • R.A.V. vs. City of St.Paul (1992).

  9. Commercial Speech • Advertising is protected speech. Restrictions must: • Implement substantial government interest; • Directly advance that interest; and • Go no further than necessary. • Case 5.3: Bad Frog Brewery (1998).

  10. Corporate Political Speech Afforded significant protection by the first amendment but not to the degree of speech of natural persons. • First National v. Bellotti (1978). • Consolidated Edison v. Public Service Commission (1980).

  11. Unprotected Speech • Certain types of speech are not protected by the first amendment: • Slander. • Obscenity (Miller v. California). • Fighting Words. • Online Obscenity. • CDA, COPA, Children’s Internet Protection Act. • Filtering Software in public libraries.

  12. Freedom of Religion • First amendment many neither prohibit the “establishment” nor prohibit the “free exercise” of religion. • The first amendment does not require complete “separation of church and state.” • First amendment mandates accommodation of all religions and forbids hostility toward any. • Zorach v. Clauson (1952) and Lynch v. Donnelly (1984).

  13. Freedom of Religion • First amendment guarantees the “free exercise” of religion. • Employers must reasonably accommodate beliefs as long as employee has sincerely held beliefs. Frazee v. Illinois (1989).

  14. Searches and Seizures • Fourth amendment requires warrant with “probable cause.” • Warrantless exceptions exist for “evanescent” evidence. • Searches of Business: generally business inspectors must have a warrant. Marshall v. Barlow’s(1978).

  15. Self-Incrimination • Fifth amendment guarantees no person can be compelled to testify against himself in a criminal proceeding. • Does not apply to corporations or partnerships.

  16. §3: Due Process and Equal Protection • 5th and 14th amendments provide “no person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law.” • Procedural and Substantive issues.

  17. Procedural Due Process • Procedures depriving an individual of her rights must be fair and equitable. • Constitution requires adequate notice and a fair and impartial hearing before a disinterested magistrate.

  18. Substantive Due Process • Focuses on the content or substance of legislation. • Laws limiting fundamental rights (speech, privacy, religion) must have a “compelling state interest.” • Laws limiting non-fundamental rights require only a “rational basis.”

  19. Equal Protection • Strict Scrutiny. • Laws that affect the fundamental rights of similarly situated individuals in a different manner are subject to the “strict scrutiny” test. • Any “suspect class” (race, national origin) must serve a “compelling state interest” which includes remedying past discrimination.

  20. Equal Protection • Intermediate Scrutiny. • Applied to laws involving gender or legitimacy. • To be constitutional laws must be substantially related to important government objectives. • (EXAMPLE: Illegitimate teenage pregnancy).

  21. Equal Protection • Rational Basis Test. • Applied to matters of economic or social welfare. • Laws will be constitutional if there is a rational basis relating to legitimate government interest.

  22. §4: Privacy Rights • Fundamental right not expressly found in the constitution, but derived from 1st, 5th and 14th amendments. • Laws and policies affecting privacy are subject to the compelling interest test.

  23. Law on the Web • Online Constitution Center. • See the “Vote-Smart” site on federalism. • The Federalist.com. • ACLU.org. • Legal Research Exercises on the Web.