80 likes | 202 Vues
This document details the progress and issues encountered during the migration to version 6.1.6 of CDF software at UW-Madison. It highlights minor changes in diagnostic codes and the ongoing testing of various components, such as Oracle Instant Client and ROOT software. Key problems identified include inconsistencies in graphics routines and issues with specific makefiles. The need for extensive validation for upcoming releases is emphasized, alongside communication with project leaders about required changes and testing protocols.
E N D
Code Migration James Bellinger University of Wisconsin at Madison 10-Feb-2010 10-Feb-2010 1
cdfsoft2 6.1.6.migrate • S. Rolli found the problem: in the diagnostic code • Change in results by itself is minor • change in 5’th decimal place when near 0 gives a sign change • She is proceeding with the rest of the tests, expect to hear today 10-Feb-2010
cdfsoft2 6.1.4mc.migrate • Lynn is starting with the changes required for 6.1.6.migrate • Experts agreed that the code changes were appropriate 10-Feb-2010
Non-Critical Upgrades: Oracle • Oracle instant_client 10.2.0.3 on fcdfbld5 for testing • D.Box suggested we rebuild with instant_client and test TrigSim++, ProductionExe with DB_DEBUG set to –1 • Some scripts need review: reference Oracle directory • Stntuple uses some include files not found in oracle_instant_client 10-Feb-2010 4
Non-Critical Upgrades: rootd • Rootd and xrootd: 4.04/02 testing • Entire cdfsoft code base tested: Problems found • rootcint doesn't recognize max_block_size in CLTD_StorableBank: Old problem? Needs hack • Changes in underlying TBRIK for TEdBrik: still have missing graphics routines Partly fixed • Problem with a .cxxd treated as a makefile with a “bad separator” • Ignoring Level3 10-Feb-2010 5
Current Timeline http://www.hep.wisc.edu/~jnb/cdfsoft/current/Timeline.xls 10-Feb-2010
Various • Request sent to physics group leaders asking what they need for validation. • So far no suggestions • Only detailed response proposed that extensive validation isn’t required • Prospective 7.1 release will need extensive validation • The longer we wait the harder it will be 10-Feb-2010
Sub-projects • Issue/Question • Required for • Required for • Required for • Issue/Question • vertical test • Remote tests • release # • Status • Who • Comments • 10K Validate 6.1.6.migrate SL4/SL4 • YES • YES • YES: 616 • pending • S.Rolli • day • 10K Validate 6.1.6.migrate SL4/SL5 • YES • YES • YES: 616 • pending • S.Rolli • day • 10K Validate 6.1.6.migrate SL5/SL5 • YES • YES • YES: 616 • pending • S.Rolli • day • TrigSim+ProductionExe diff • YES • YES • YES: 616 • in progress • Costas • Is the difference in results real? • 100K Validate 6.1.6.migrate SL5/SL5 • YES • YES • YES: 616 • pending • S.Rolli • ?40K is handy • Review patches for use w/ 6.1.4mc.migrate • YES • YES • YES: mc • pending • J.Bellinger • time=? • Use patches to create build of 6.1.4mc.migrate • YES • YES • YES: mc • pending • J.Bellinger/L.Garren • time=? • Use Full Flavor for 32/64 bit SL5 • NO • NO • Decided: all • pending • L.Garren • time=? • SRT_CDF changes • NO • YES • YES: all • pending • L.Garren • ? related to above? • All distribution scripts • NO • YES • YES: all • pending • L.Garren • superset of above • sam package • NO • NO • YES: all • in progress • ? • testing? • cdfkits vs fnkits • NO • YES • YES: all • pending • ? • Lynn saw difference, sanity check required • Check versions of java/perl/tcl • NO • NO • YES: all • in progress • R.Snider, LGarren • java 1.6.0.x, perl 5.8.8, tcl 8.4; looks like a go • " • " • " • " • " • SLC5(lxplus5) vs SLF5; grid machines, CMS, Atlas • " • " • " • " • " • Jnb note • Fermi additions to SLF5 seem unimportant • Document migrate changes • NO • NO • YES: all • pending • J.Bellinger • Need email/web page documentation of new release • instant_client Oracle • NO • NO • NO • pending • ?D. Box? • ?Interface same? Test • root 4.00vs 4.04 • NO • NO • NO • pending • R.Culbertson, J.Bellinger • problems: may need packaging massaging • dcap declared as current • NO • NO • No but • pending • ? • Releases from now on should do this • cvsroot command fixed • NO • NO • No • pending • ? • Fixed in development • dbfrontier in 6.1.6 code • NO • ? • Yes: 616 ? • pending • R.Snider and S.Lammel? • Snider to make sure this is understood