1 / 34

Module 2: Content-Area Literacy

Module 2: Content-Area Literacy. Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development. Unit 1, Session 3. Reading Like a Critic, Historian, Mathematician, & Scientist. Strategic Reading in Four Major Content Areas. Essential Questions. Module 2 Question

purity
Télécharger la présentation

Module 2: Content-Area Literacy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Module 2: Content-Area Literacy Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 1, Session 3

  2. Reading Like a Critic, Historian, Mathematician, & Scientist Strategic Reading in Four Major Content Areas

  3. Essential Questions • Module 2 Question • What role can content-area teachers play in helping adolescents acquire general and discipline-specific literacy skills? • Unit 1, Session 3 Questions • What are the ways in which content-area teachers can improve content instruction by highlighting and explicitly teaching disciplinary literacy strategies? • How are general literacy strategies tailored to fit particular disciplinary goals? Module 2: Unit 1, Session 3

  4. Revisiting Our Last Session • Given your reading of Lee & Spratley… • Share with a partner what you wrote in the 2nd column of your 3-column organizer. • What are the unique ways in which students must read in your discipline ? • What makes reading in your discipline challenging / different from other content areas? Module 2: Unit 1, Session 3

  5. Warm-Up • Think for a moment about what is most important to a Mathematician, Scientist, Historian, or Literary Critic when reading a document. • Read the short article: • “Kyoto and Beyond: Kyoto Protocol FAQs” • http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/kyoto/ • Use the Circle of Viewpoints protocol to respond to the article from the perspective of a Mathematician, Scientist, Historian, or Literary Critic Module 2: Unit 1, Session 3

  6. Warm-Up Circle of Viewpoints: • I am thinking ofThe Kyoto Protocolfrom the point of view ofa Mathematician, Scientist, Historian, or Literary Critic. • I think ... describe the topic from your viewpoint. Be an actor – take on the character of your viewpoint. • A question I have from this viewpoint is ... Module 2: Unit 1, Session 3

  7. “To a man with a hammer,everything looks like a nail.” ~Mark Twain  Coming Back Together: • Which parts of the text did you focus on from your disciplinary/content-area perspective? • Which parts did you ignore? • What was it like to read the article from your point of view? • What makes reading from this perspective challenging? • If you were going to use this text in your classroom, what might you ask students to do with it? Module 2: Unit 1, Session 3

  8. Given the Texts Students Will Read • Textbooks • Full length books • Book chapters • Journal and magazine articles • Newspaper articles • Historically situated primary documents • Multimedia and digital texts Lee, C. D., & Spratley, A. (2009). Teaching Content Knowledge and Reading Strategies in Tandem. Module 2: Unit 1, Session 3

  9. There are a Number of “Generic” Strategies • Monitoring comprehension • Pre-reading strategies (e.g., anticipation guides) • Setting goals • Thinking about what one already knows • Asking questions • Making predictions • Testing predictions against the text • Re-reading • Summarizing Lee, C. D., & Spratley, A. (2009). Teaching Content Knowledge and Reading Strategies in Tandem. Module 2: Unit 1, Session 3

  10. How Can You Apply/Tailor “Generic” Strategies to Particular Disciplinary Needs? • Building prior knowledge • Building specialized vocabulary • Learning to deconstruct complex sentences • Using knowledge of text structures and genres to predict main and subordinate ideas • Mapping graphic (and mathematical) representations against explanations in the text • Posing discipline relevant questions • Comparing claims and propositions across texts • Using norms for reasoning within the discipline (i.e., what counts as evidence) to evaluate claims Lee, C. D., & Spratley, A. (2009). Teaching Content Knowledge and Reading Strategies in Tandem. Module 2: Unit 1, Session 3

  11. Implications for Reading Content Given the habits of mind ways of reading we wish to encourage… AND Given the ways in which content-area texts are difficult for students to access and use… We need general and specific strategies for supporting students in overcoming difficulties and focusing on content-area concepts. Module 2: Unit 1, Session 3

  12. Finding Disciplinary Strategies • Please read/review one or more of the following: • Reading Mathematics • By Thomasenia Lott Adams Teaching Reading in Mathematics and Science • By Mary Lee Barton, Clare Heidema, & Deborah Jordan • Promoting Reading Comprehension in Social Studies • By Dixie D.Massey & Tina L. Heafner Building Literacy in Social Studies, Ch. 6: Strategies for Textbook Literacy • By Donna Ogle, Ron Klemp, & Bill McBride Module 2: Unit 1, Session 3

  13. Finding Disciplinary Strategies • Please read/review one or more of the following: • Improving Reading Skills in the Science Classroom • Teaching Today Skills and Strategies at Work (Reading in the Sciences) • Just Read Now! (part of Just Read Florida!) • Guidelines for teaching middle and high school students to read and write well • Judith A. Langer, Elizabeth Close, Janet Angelis, and Paula Preller Shouldn’t They Already Know How to Read? Comprehension Strategies in High School English • Julie Gorlewski Module 2: Unit 1, Session 3

  14. Finding Disciplinary Strategies • While reading/reviewing the article(s), please refer to a content-area text you brought to this session. • Make notes on a 3-Column Chart as you read/review the suggestions each article gives for helping students better understand the text you brought. • How are instructional goals/strategies connected? Module 2: Unit 1, Session 3

  15. Module 2: Unit 1, Session 3

  16. Anything New? Coming Back Together: • What did you find that was new? • What did you find that reinforces work you are already doing? • What did you find that might work best for your content area? Module 2: Unit 1, Session 3

  17. Categories of Cognitive Strategies • Neufeld (2005) reviews general reading strategies found to support reading and learning: • Question asking and answering • Clarifying a purpose for reading • Overviewing the text • Activating prior knowledge relevant to the text • Making predictions about the text • Attending to text structure • Creating summaries • Monitoring comprehension and using fix-up strategies Neufeld, P. (2005). Comprehension instruction in content area classes. Module 2: Unit 1, Session 3

  18. How Do These Translate into Concrete Strategies in Your Discipline? • Look again at Adlit.org’s Strategy Library • Look at Project Zero’s Thinking Routines • Also look at the following strategies from Just Read Florida! • Discussion Strategies • Active Reading Strategies • Vocabulary Strategies • Organization Strategies Module 2: Unit 1, Session 3

  19. How Do These Translate into Concrete Strategies in Your Discipline? • How are these strategies connected to what you read? • To the habits of mind in your discipline? • Which strategies are you already using? • Which might you adopt and/or adapt? Module 2: Unit 1, Session 3

  20. Wrap-Up: What Might You Do Now? • Revisit the short article • “Kyoto and Beyond: Kyoto Protocol FAQs” • http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/kyoto/ • What strategy (or strategies) might you use with students reading this article in YOUR content-area? • How would the strategies serve your particular instructional purposes? Module 2: Unit 1, Session 3

  21. Wrap-Up: Reading in Math • Re-reading & close reading • Defining vocabulary: Examples vs. non-examples • Defining vocabulary: Everyday use/mathematical use • Defining vocabulary: Reviewing homophones • Creating word walls • Marking the text to highlight, define, show work • Problem-solving steps: • Read the problem • Understand the problem • Solve the problem • Look back • Explicitly noting relationship between words, numbers, symbols Module 2: Unit 1, Session 3

  22. Image from Mr. Follett ‘s “Weapons of Math Destruction” blog: http://mrfollett.wordpress.com/tag/word-wall/ Module 2: Unit 1, Session 3

  23. Wrap-Up: Reading in Science • Defining technical vocabulary • Reviewing Latin/Greek roots and word parts (morphology) • Creating word walls • Marking the text to highlight, define, show work • Reading and writing to focus on science “process skills” • Observation, Measurement, Experimentation, Communication, & Critical thinking • Making connections between texts, self, world • Reading with a particular purpose in mind • Questioning/Hypothesis-generating while reading • Reviewing and using text structure to guide understanding • Creating diagrams, flowcharts, semantic webs • Charting steps in a process, phases in a cycle, parts of a system Module 2: Unit 1, Session 3

  24. Wrap-Up: Reading in Social Studies • Defining vocabulary: • Historical meaning, contemporary meaning, meaning in other subjects • E.g., “revolution,” “interment,” “Republican” • Creating word walls • Reading with a particular purpose in mind • Reading for bias/for a particular viewpoint • Comparing and contrasting viewpoints • Making connections between texts, self, world • Reviewing and using text structure to guide understanding • Creating timelines • Double-entry/multi-column notes for comparing sources Module 2: Unit 1, Session 3

  25. Wrap-Up: Reading in English Language Arts • Reading with a particular purpose in mind • Previewing vocabulary relevant to plot, theme • Reading for author intent, theme, perspective • Comparing & contrasting viewpoints across characters/texts • Making connections between texts, self, world • Reviewing and using text structure to guide understanding • Reviewing components of different genres to guide understanding • Poems, plays, short stories, novels, essays • Double-entry/multi-column notes for comparing characters/ authors/texts Module 2: Unit 1, Session 3

  26. Further Study • This might be an ideal time to begin a study group around content-area strategies to improve reading. • We suggest systematically exploring the strategies listed on the three websites noted in this session: • Adlit.org • Project Zero’s Visible Thinking/Thinking Routines • Just Read Florida! • A department, content-area team, grade-level team, or entire staff might spend an agreed-upon amount of time tailoring and trying the strategies on these pages. Module 2: Unit 1, Session 3

  27. Further Study • We suggest, for systematic study, that teams of teachers explore the strategies within categories: • Either as “pre- /guided-/ post-” strategies (Adlit.org) • Or as strategies for particular instructional purposes • Discussion Strategies • Active Reading Strategies • Vocabulary Strategies • Organization Strategies Module 2: Unit 1, Session 3

  28. References Adams, T. L. (2003). Reading mathematics: More than words can say. The Reading Teacher, 56(8), 786–795. CBC News. (2007). Kyoto and beyond: Kyoto protocol FAQs. Retrieved from http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/kyoto/ Gorlewski, J. (2009). Research for the classroom: Shouldn’t they already know how to read? Comprehension strategies in high school English. Urbana, IL: NCTE. Just Read Now! (n.d.). Skills and strategies that work. Just Read Florida! Retrieved from http://www.justreadnow.com/content/science/skills.htm Module 2: Unit 1, Session 3

  29. References Langer, J. A., with Close, E., Angelis, J., & Preller, P. (2000). Guidelines for teaching middle and high school students to read and write well: Six features of effective instruction. Albany, NY: National Research Center on English Learning and Achievement. Massey, D. D., & Heafner, T. L. (2004). Promoting Reading Comprehension in Social Studies. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 48(1), 26–40. Ogle, D., Klemp, R., & McBride, B. (2007). Building literacy in social studies: Strategies for improving comprehension and critical thinking. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Chapter 1 Online: Reading Social Studies Texts Chapter 6 Online: Strategies for Textbook Literacy Module 2: Unit 1, Session 3

More Related