1 / 10

The Cottages At Hickory Crossing Dallas’ Premier Model of Permanent Supportive Housing

The Cottages At Hickory Crossing Dallas’ Premier Model of Permanent Supportive Housing A Status Report January 2011. Partners. Metrocare Services : Behavioral health services, fiscal agent Central Dallas CDC : Housing development CitySquare : Case management, public relations lead

purity
Télécharger la présentation

The Cottages At Hickory Crossing Dallas’ Premier Model of Permanent Supportive Housing

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Cottages At Hickory Crossing Dallas’ Premier Model of Permanent Supportive Housing A Status Report January 2011

  2. Partners • Metrocare Services: Behavioral health services, fiscal agent • Central Dallas CDC: Housing development • CitySquare: Case management, public relations lead • UT Southwestern: Program evaluation • Metro Dallas Homeless Alliance: Intake & referral • Dallas County Criminal Justice: Liaison to courts • Supporting Partners • Funding leadership: • W.W. Caruth, Jr. Foundation • Meadows Foundation • Project management: • Corporation for Supportive Housing

  3. Project Objective The Cottages at Hickory Crossing: A model permanent supportive housing community • Goal: Develop and implement Texas’ premier model of permanent supportive housing, providing: • On-site access to most services …including high-quality healthcare and social services • Integration of services …a team approach to housing, healthcare and social services • Improved behavioral health and physical health outcomes …and quality of life of individuals served by the program • Cost savings to taxpayers …through reduced expenditures on public safety, behavioral health and healthcare • Ongoing research and evaluation …of program and clinical outcomes to guide future programs

  4. Project Concept • Target Population: • Chronically homeless who are involved in the criminal justice system, mentally ill, and/or have substance abuse issues • Three-year Pilot: • 50 units of permanent supportive housing with continued operation thereafter • Evidence-Based Service Design: • Housing-first, integrated clinical and social services • Rigorous Evaluation: • Including housing stability, public costs, and behavioral health outcomes

  5. Project Location and Site

  6. Unit Design bcWorkshop has developed a model for sustainable urban living, balancing living space with open space.

  7. Tenant Selection • Tenants will be referred by: • MDHA via The Bridge • The Dallas County criminal justice system • Selection criteria include: • Chronically Homeless • Severe and persistent mental illness • Schizophrenia, bipolar disorder • Usually complicated by substance use history • High cost to the public due to use of: • County jail • Homeless shelters • Emergency rooms

  8. Pilot Project • W.W. Caruth, Jr. Foundation funded a transitional housing program that offered: • Immediate relief for overcrowding at The Bridge • An opportunity to pilot clinical approaches to this challenging population • Program Characteristics: • Duration: February 2009 to November 2010 • Total enrollments: 142 • Clients (“Phase 1” only = 97 clients): • Male - 73% • African American - 69%; Hispanic – 5% • Bipolar – 46%; depression – 42%; schizophrenia – 12%

  9. Pilot Project Outcomes • Housing Outcomes: • Total permanent placements: 78 (55%) • Unsuccessful admissions: 47 (33%) • 60% of these were in program’s first six months • Left without being placed: 17 (12%) • Functional Outcomes: • Mental health symptoms decreased for all diagnoses • ER visits: down 67% at 120 days • Hospital days: down 67% at 90 days • Jail days: down 80% at 120 days

  10. Pilot Project Outcomes • Financial Outcomes: • Cost per client served: $ 9,400 • Cost per successful placement: $17,000 • Comparison of average monthly program costs: • Pilot project: $ 1,400 • Jail: $ 1,950 • Hospital: $ 12,000 • Community feedback: • From CitySquare staff: “a marked difference between how well former COE residents are doing in permanent housing compared to the residents from shelters.”

More Related