1 / 25

Developing Countries in the Global Financial Crisis: A Minskyan Account

Developing Countries in the Global Financial Crisis: A Minskyan Account. Annina Kaltenbrunner Lecturer in the Economics of Globalisation & The International Economy Leeds University Business School . Motivation. Outline. Neoclassical Models of Financial (Foreign Exchange) Crisis

qabil
Télécharger la présentation

Developing Countries in the Global Financial Crisis: A Minskyan Account

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Developing Countries in the Global Financial Crisis: A Minskyan Account AnninaKaltenbrunner Lecturer in the Economics of Globalisation & The International Economy Leeds University Business School

  2. Motivation

  3. Outline • Neoclassical Models of Financial (Foreign Exchange) Crisis • Post Keynesian Theories of Financial Crisis • Keynes: Chapter 12 of the General Theory • Hyman Minsky: The Financial Instability Hypothesis > Policy Implications and Open Economy Applications • Developing Countries (Brazil) in the Global Financial Crisis (September 2008)

  4. Neoclassical ModelsOverview • First Generation Models (Krugman 1979) • Rational speculators attack central bank in face of fundamental disequilibria (current account and/or fiscal deficit) • Second Generation Models (Obstfeld, 1996) • Self fulfilling expectations about deteriorating fundamentals – Government “Trade-off” • Third (Asian) Generation Models (e.g. McKinnon and Pill, 1996; Radelet and Sachs, 1998; Chang and Velasco, 2002) • Concern about external repayment capacity • Net short-term external debt (“original sin”)

  5. Neoclassical ModelsAssumptions • Efficient markets • Underlying “real” fundamentals run the show (dichotomy between monetary and real) • Heterodox approaches to Asian crisis (foreign currency debt) • Rational agents • First Generation: No doubt • Third Generation/Asymmetric information: Constrained information (moral hazard and adverse selection) • (Behavioural Finance: Heterogeneous)

  6. Neoclassical ModelsPolicy Recommendations • Fix Fundamentals • Current account, fiscal balance, inflation etc. • Reduce net foreign currency debt • Develop domestic financial markets • Accumulate foreign exchange reserves • Asymmetric Information: Transparency • Further reduce State involvement in financial markets (e.g. “rule-bound”, flexible exchange rates) • Further open capital account (macroeconomic discipline, liquidity for domestic financial market etc.)

  7. Post Keynesian Theories of Financial Markets/Financial Crisis • Monetary Production Economy • Creative agency/expectations • Fundamental Uncertainty (non-ergodicity) • “Rationality” pointless • Inter-subjective nature of price formation

  8. John Maynard KeynesGeneral Theory: Chapter 12 • What determines Investment? • Rate of interest and the schedule of the marginal efficiency of capital • Rate of Interest (GT: Chapters 13-17) • Reward for parting with the security provided by money in a world of fundamental uncertainty and historical time >> money as “secure abode of purchasing power” and medium of contractual settlement (Paul Davidson) • Marginal Efficiency of Capital • Relation between the supply-price of capital asset and its prospective yield

  9. Chapter 12Prospective Yield “The considerations upon which expectations of prospective yields are based are partly existing facts which we assume to be known more or less for certain, and partly future events which can only be forecasted with more or less confidence”…. ”We may sum up the state of psychological expectation which covers the latter as being the state of long-term expectation...”

  10. Chapter 12Speculation • Conventions and State of Confidence • Conventions: “Assuming that the existing state of affairs will continue indefinitely, expect in so far as we have specific reasons to expect a change” • Speculation vs. Enterprise • Stock Market (Secondary Market) • “It is as though a farmer, having tapped his barometer after breakfast, could decide to remove his capital from the farming business between 10 and 11 in the morning and reconsider whether he should return to it later in the week” • Precariousness of Conventions • Musical Chair/Beauty Contest • Displaces enterprise

  11. Chapter 12Speculation “Speculators may do no harm as bubbles on a steady stream of enterprise. But the position is serious when enterprise becomes a bubble on a whirlpool of speculation. When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done”.

  12. Chapter 12Summary and Policy Implications • Swings in asset prices detached from “fundamentals” inherent feature of capitalist economies • Worse in more liquid markets • Negative implications for investment and capital formation • Animal Spirit: spontaneous urge to action rather than inaction • Policy Implications: • Stabilizing conventions? • Investment permanent and indissoluble >> Illiquidity? • “Force” socially beneficial investment • State investment

  13. Chapter 12 Applications and Extension • Keynes: stock market • Paul Davidson, John T. Harvey: foreign exchange market • Sheila Dow: financial markets in general • Alves et al. (among others): Asian financial crisis • But: Keynes not a theory of financial crisis >>> Minsky

  14. Hyman Minsky The Financial Instability Hypothesis • “John Maynard Keynes” (1975); “Stabilizing an Unstable Economy” (1986) • Missing link in General Theory is finance (credit) – liability side of balance sheets • Theory of inherent and endogenous fragility of financial markets and capitalist economies • Balance sheet/Wall Street view of capitalist economies • Financial fragility and instability due to changing cash flow configurations over the business cycle (profits vs. debt payments) >Financial Instability Hypothesis

  15. The Financial Instability HypothesisBuilding Blocs 1. (Subjective) Expectations change over course of the cycle: stability breeds instability • Rising investment > higher profits and rising asset prices > feedback to investment > boom/euphoria 2. Increasingly fragile financial structures - match between cash flow commitments (debt service and principal) and cash income (investment yields) • Hedge: income meets interest rates and principal • Speculative: income meets interest rates but not principal • Ponzi: income does not cover interest rates >> Margin of safety falls >> Increased vulnerability to changing (financial) market conditions

  16. The Financial Instability Hypothesis Building Blocs 3. Endogenous “shock” (rise in interest rate) which turns fragility into instability • Central bank raises interest rate to cool economy • Banks raise interest rate reacting to high demand for external finance 4. Debt deflation (Fisher (1933)) • Rising interest rates > higher borrowing costs, falling net-worth, lower credit ratings > inability to meet cash flow requirements • Falling profits and asset prices • Defaults > banking crisis

  17. The Financial Instability HypothesisSummary and Policy Implications • Financial instability and crisis inherent feature of capitalist economies with “mature” financial markets • Financial crisis not due to misaligned fundamentals but increasingly fragile financial structures – balance sheets and cash flow requirements Policy Implications: • Big Government > stabilize firm profits • Big Bank > stabilize asset prices • Regulate Finance

  18. The Financial Instability Hypothesis Applications and Extensions • Capitalist firm > banks, households, states • Open economy/Emerging Markets • Exogenous shock? • Exchange rate > “super-speculative” units (Arestis and Glickman, 2002)

  19. Developing Countries in the Global Financial Crisis

  20. Neoclassical Models Fundamentals and Foreign Currency Debt

  21. Post Keynesian/Minskyan AccountUnprecedented Amount of Capital Flows

  22. Post Keynesian/Minskyan AccountIn complex, very short-term domestic currency assets

  23. Post Keynesian/Minskyan AccountWhich created Balance Sheet Vulnerabilities

  24. Post Keynesian/Minskyan AccountThe Crisis • “Shock” (rising interest rates and increased risk aversion in developing financial markets) • Rising funding costs for international banks • Speculative and Ponzi Units need to make position • Do so in overexposed and liquid assets > Brazil • Falling asset prices and exchange rate depreciation exacerbate financing difficulties > Stampede and exchange rate depreciation by 60% unrelated to Brazilian fundamentals

  25. Conclusions • Neoclassical vs. Post Keynesian: Different Ontological assumptions of how financial markets (economic dynamics generally) work • Neoclassical: stable underlying fundamentals which will be aligned with expectations as long as frictions are removed (government, noise traders etc.) • Post Keynesian: Symbiotic relationship between real and finance; no underlying fundamentals; inherent fragility of financial markets and economic systems >>> State and Government Control

More Related