1 / 18

Secrets of a Successful Software Switch (& Database Conversion)

Secrets of a Successful Software Switch (& Database Conversion). Jeannette Jackson-Thompson, MSPH, PhD Operations Director, Missouri Cancer Registry Research Associate Professor, Health Management & Informatics, University of Missouri-Columbia jacksonthompsonj@health.missouri.edu.

quanda
Télécharger la présentation

Secrets of a Successful Software Switch (& Database Conversion)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Secrets of a Successful Software Switch (& Database Conversion) Jeannette Jackson-Thompson, MSPH, PhDOperations Director, Missouri Cancer RegistryResearch Associate Professor, Health Management & Informatics, University of Missouri-Columbia jacksonthompsonj@health.missouri.edu This project was supported in part by a cooperative agreement between the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) (#U58/DP000820-01) and a Surveillance Contract between DHSS and the University of Missouri.

  2. Acknowledgments • Missouri Cancer Registry (MCR) staff • Sue Vest, Nancy Cole, Mary Jane King, Iris Zachary, Saba Yemane – input for presentation • All MCR staff who willingly worked long hours to make this latest software & database conversion a success • Registry Plus development & support team

  3. Objectives • Provide an overview of MCR’s central cancer registry (CCR) software and database conversion experiences • Identify key considerations in making a software switch • Highlight components for success

  4. Background on MCR • Historical: 1972 – voluntary agreement • State mandate – 1984, implemented ‘85 • Federal mandate (Cancer Registries Amendment Act of 1992) – MO funded 1995 • NPCR reference year = 1996 • Expanded reporting – 1999 (192.650 – 192.657 RSMo)

  5. Background – MCR Data • 45,000 – 50,000 records/year • c. 28,000 unduplicated MO cases/year • c. 400,000 unduplicated cases in database • primarily1996 and later • Historical database – > 325,000 records • 1995 and earlier

  6. Background – Software #1 • ≤ 1996: State-developed system • Non-standard layout • Non-standard data elements • Leased hardware (Nixdorf mini – mainframe connection for data storage) • CTRs had no direct access to data

  7. Background – Software #2 • 1996: NPCR funds used for CCR software • Vendor type: Not-for-profit, multiple CCR clients • Standard data elements, NAACCR layout • PC-based system • New Database Manager • CTRs have direct access to data

  8. Background – Software #3 • 1997: NPCR unobligated funds used for CCR software • Vendor type: University, MCR sole client • Standard data elements, NAACCR layout • MO-customized software on super-PC (DEC Alpha, Oracle tables • Stable system (“down” > 24 hrs 1 time in 7 yrs) • Database integrity well-protected • Historic database still separate (match, not update)

  9. Background – Software #4 • 2004: NPCR funds for CCR software available in contract but DHSS they must make purchase • Vendor type: For profit, small number of CCRs use • Standard data elements, NAACCR layout • PC-based, vendor controls access to “back end” • Did not “go live” until 10/05 (not 2/05 as needed) • Lack of shared vocabulary (conversion v. migration) • > 325,000 “dirty” historic records imported(pending) • System not stable, database integrity in question

  10. May 2007 – MCR Quandary • DHSS contract w/ vendor – 3rd year 9/07 • System not stable • Database integrity • MCR staff frustration • Productivity and morale impacted

  11. MCR Solution • Visit another CCR (PA) • See another CCR software system in use • Obtain hands-on experience with CRS Plus • Meet with current vendor • Enter into dialogue with CDC/NPCR project officer and Registry Plus development/support team • MCR already using Abstract Plus, Web Plus

  12. Key Considerations • If we don’t switch software now, what happens? • Productivity & morale decline further • Database integrity may be impaired beyond repair • Contract deliverables, NPCR requirements in question • Is a viable, affordable alternative available? • How many existing problems will be solved? • Will new challenges be created? • What do key staff want to do? • Is a switch feasible?

  13. Considerations for Success • Knowledge of software, hardware & network • Well-trained, competent, motivated staff with needed expertise • Two-sided communication with vendor • Both sides willing to listen, learn, cooperate • CCR & vendor have common interest • Clean, high-quality data (not “bottom line”) • Ongoing, mutually-beneficial relationship

  14. More Considerations • Make sure CCR & vendor using common vocabulary • Data dictionary • Manuals, on-line help • Mutual respect for knowledge, expertise • Willingness to learn, adapt to reach desired outcome

  15. Software #5 • Discussions 6/07 – 7/07 • Decision 8/07 • Notify DHSS – they notify vendor • Shut down #4 9/07 • Most 2005 cases edited, consolidated • Many 2006 cases not entered • Conference calls, Web demos 8/07-10/07

  16. Software #5 (cont’d) • Establish: • Task list for CCR & vendor • Identify responsible parties • Time frame for tasks/actions • Monitor tasks/actions/steps/stage in process • Modify tasks/responsibilities/steps if needed • Create extract files • Test new system • Go live!

  17. Success!!! • Target date – mid-Oct; Actual ‘go live – early Nov. 07 • Active and historical databases combined • Few problems experienced • NAACCR submission – 10-day extension; uploaded day 6 • GOLD certification • NPCR data submission – on schedule • > 95% at 24 months, > 90% at 12 months (1st time)

  18. Satisfied QA Staff Comments - Deb Smith, BA, CTR Questions? Thanks to MCR & Registry Plus staff

More Related