1 / 61

Market Hog Evaluation

Market Hog Evaluation. History. 1910’s. History. 1910’s. 1920’s. History. Bacon Type: Lighter & Leaner 1924 Champion Chester White Barrow 1924 Champion Pen Three Yorkshrires. 1940’s. History. 1944. 1947. History. 1950’s. 1949. 1954. 1958. History. 1960’s. 1967. 1970’s.

rae-beard
Télécharger la présentation

Market Hog Evaluation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Market Hog Evaluation

  2. History 1910’s

  3. History 1910’s

  4. 1920’s History Bacon Type: Lighter & Leaner 1924 Champion Chester White Barrow 1924 Champion Pen Three Yorkshrires

  5. 1940’s History 1944 1947

  6. History 1950’s 1949 1954 1958

  7. History 1960’s 1967

  8. 1970’s History 1970 1977 1978

  9. 1980’s History 1982 1983 1988

  10. History 1990’s 1991 1994

  11. Late 1990’s History 1998

  12. 2000’s History

  13. 2000’s History

  14. 2000’s History .4 BF 8.9 LEA, 62.61% Lean

  15. 2000’s History

  16. 2000’s History

  17. 2003 History

  18. History 1990’s 1991 2001

  19. 1961 1980 1996

  20. History 1960’s 35 years of change

  21. Future Complete With Muscle Trend to Heavier constructed Bigger boned & Heavier muscled hogs

  22. Average Market Hog 2000 NPPC lean growth modeling Project: 1550 head of hogs Weight 280 lbs Back fat 1.1” LEA 5.5 Muscle 2 USDA Grade #2

  23. Ideal Market Hog Weight 275 lbs Back fat .8” LEA 6.0 + Muscle 2+ USDA Grade #1

  24. Ideal Market Hog Packers response: - 270 lbs - White Hogs prefered - Hogs that can walk - Minimum fat depth of .6” - Swift/Hormel .8” export market higher - Loin eye 7” - Minimum 54% lean - Stress Free

  25. Ideal Market Hog Quality (Packer response 1) Water holding capacity 2) Color 3) Tenderness 4) IMF (intramuscular fat)

  26. Ideal Market Hog Quality (Packer response 1) Water holding capacity - Greatest economic loss to the industry - Dries excessively during cooking

  27. Ideal Market Hog Quality (Packer response 2) Color - Important to consumers and japenesse market - Cannot be measured on kill floor ~ fab floor - Id becomes a problem

  28. Quality Color Standards Unacceptable 1 4 2 3 Unacceptable 5

  29. Ideal Market Hog Quality (Packer response 3) Tenderness - Many packers enhance product up to 30% to insure tenderness and juiciness

  30. Ideal Market Hog Quality (Packer response 4) IMF (intramuscular fat) - Provides juiciness and flavor - Not as much of an issue with (enhanced pork) - Evaluated on a scale of 1-10

  31. Marbling Scores Unacceptable 1 2 4 3 Unacceptable 5

  32. RFN Ham Red, Firm, and Normal (RFN)

  33. PSE Pale, Soft, and Exudative (PSE)

  34. DFD HamDark, Firm, and Dry (DFD)

  35. Market Hog Evaluation • Two methods to quantify Lean to fat 1) USDA Grade - Oldest used only to classify markets by some reporters 2) Percent Lean

  36. Market Hog Evaluation USDA Yield Grade • Last rib back fat • Muscle score (1, 2, 3) (4 x last rib fat) – muscle score

  37. Market Hog Evaluation • Percent Lean 1) Weight - 2) Fat measurement 10th rib Best indicator of total fat – Why? 3) Loin eye measurement - 10th rib - best indicator of total muscle Base Hog is 250 lbs, .80 BF, 5.0 LEA

  38. Visual Indicators of Muscle/Lean

  39. Visual Indicators of Muscle/Lean

  40. Visual Indicators of Muscle/Lean

  41. Visual Indicators of Muscle/Lean

  42. Practice Comparisons 235 lbs

  43. Practice Comparisons 285 lbs

  44. Practice Comparisons 235 lbs 285 lbs DP .74 Last rib BF .3 Muscle score 2+ USDA Grade #1 10th rib BF .40 LEA 7.2 % Lean 58.5 DP .73 Last rib BF 1.9 Muscle score 2- USDA Grade #5.6 10th rib BF 1.8 LEA 3.8 % Lean 37.6

  45. Practice Comparisons 245 lbs

  46. Practice Comparisons 245 lbs DP .72 HCW 180 Last rib BF 1.25 Muscle score 2- USDA Grade #3 10th Rib BF 1.20 LEA 4.2 % Lean 43.7

More Related